664
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Improving the utility of the fine motor skills subscale of the comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers: a computerized adaptive test

, , , , &
Pages 2803-2809 | Received 17 Dec 2016, Accepted 13 Jul 2017, Published online: 27 Jul 2017

References

  • Exner CE. Development of hand skills. In: Case-Smith J, editor. Occupational therapy for children. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2001. p. 289–328.
  • Case-Smith J. The relationships among sensorimotor components, fine motor skill, and functional performance in preschool children. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49:645–652.
  • McHale K, Cermak SA. Fine motor activities in elementary school: preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46:898–903.
  • Tsai YP, Tung LC, Lee YC, et al. Selecting score types for longitudinal evaluations: the responsiveness of the comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers in children with developmental disabilities. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:1103–1109.
  • Anthony CJ, DiPerna JC, Lei PW. Maximizing measurement efficiency of behavior rating scales using item response theory: an example with the social skills improvement system-teacher rating scale. J Sch Psychol. 2016;55:57–69.
  • Fenson L, Pethick S, Renda C, et al. Short-form versions of the MacArthur communicative development inventories. Appl Psycholinguist. 2000;21:95–116.
  • Kambas A, Aggeloussis N. Construct validity of the Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency–short form for a sample of Greek preschool and primary school children. Percept Mot Skills. 2006;102:65–72.
  • Wang TM. The comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers manual. Taipei: Taipei Special Education Divided Ministration Education; 2003. Chinese.
  • Liao HF, Pan YL. Test–retest and inter-rater reliability for the comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers diagnostic and screening tests. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:927–937.
  • Liao HF, Yao G, Wang TM. Concurrent in Taiwan of the comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers who were full-term infants. Percept Mot Skills. 2008;107:29–44.
  • Wang TM, Liao HF. Assessment accuracy and cut-off points of comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers (CDIIT). Bull Spec Educ. 2007;32:1–15. Chinese.
  • Wang TM. Predictive validity of comprehensive developmental inventory for infants and toddlers (CDIIT). Bull Spec Educ. 2005;29:1–24. Chinese.
  • Weiss DJ. Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2004;37:70–84.
  • Beckmann JT, Hung M, Bounsanga J, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computerized adaptive test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24:1961–1967.
  • Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustafson JE, et al. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.
  • Hou WH, Shih CL, Chou YT, et al. Development of a computerized adaptive testing system of the Fugl–Meyer motor scale in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1014–1020.
  • Clauser B, Linacre JM. Relating Cronbach and Rasch reliabilities. Rasch Meas Trans. 1999;13:696.
  • Lohr KN. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193–205.
  • Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:315–340.
  • Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459–468.
  • Schumacker RE, Smith EV. A Rasch perspective. Educ Psychol Meas. 2007;67:394–409.
  • Haley SM, Raczek AE, Coster WJ, et al. Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:932–939.
  • Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Dumas HM, et al. Evaluation of an item bank for a computerized adaptive test of activity in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2009;89:589–600.
  • Haley SM, Coster WJ, Dumas HM, et al. Accuracy and precision of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory computer-adaptive tests (PEDI-CAT) ). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:1100–1106.
  • Chien CW, Bond TG. Measurement properties of fine motor scale of Peabody developmental motor scales: a Rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:376–386.
  • Wuang YP, Lin YH, Su CY. Rasch analysis of the Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency–in intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:1132–1144.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.