Physical functioning and activities of daily living in adults with amyoplasia, the most common form of arthrogryposis. A cross-sectional study

References

• Hall JG. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: etiology, genetics, classification, diagnostic approach, and general aspects. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6:159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JG. Arthrogryposis (multiple congenital contractures): diagnostic approach to etiology, classification, genetics, and general principles. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:464–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JG, Reed SD, Driscoll EP. Part I. Amyoplasia: a common, sporadic condition with congenital contractures. Am J Med Genet. 1983;15:571–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamshad M, Van Heest AE, Pleasure D. Arthrogryposis: a review and update. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(Suppl 4):40–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall JG, Aldinger KA, Tanaka KI. Amyoplasia revisited. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:700–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JG. Amyoplasia involving only the upper limbs or only involving the lower limbs with review of the relevant differential diagnoses. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:859–873.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sells JM, Jaffe KM, Hall JG. Amyoplasia, the most common type of arthrogryposis: the potential for good outcome. Pediatrics. 1996;97:225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein RM. Arthrogryposis and amyoplasia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:417–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Bedard T, et al. Prevalence of multiple congenital contractures including arthrogryposis multiplex congenita in Alberta, Canada, and a strategy for classification and coding. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:1057–1061.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darin N, Kimber E, Kroksmark AK, et al. Multiple congenital contractures: birth prevalence, etiology, and outcome. J Pediatr. 2002;140:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drachmann DB, Banker BQ. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Case due to disease of the anterior horn cells. Arch Neurol. 1961;5:77–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bach A, La Grone M, Almquist E. In: Staheli LT, Hall JG, Jaffe K, et al. editors. Arthrogryposis: a text atlas. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DW, Drennan JC. Arthrogryposis wrist deformities: results of infantile serial casting. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:44–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan WP, Hall JG, Bamshad M, et al. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (amyoplasia): an orthopaedic perspective. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:594–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bosse HJ, Marangoz S, Lehman WB, et al. Correction of arthrogrypotic clubfoot with a modified Ponseti technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1283–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilli S, Antonioli D, Lampasi M, et al. Management of hip contractures and dislocations in arthrogryposis. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012;96:17–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pontén E. Management of the knees in arthrogryposis. J Child Orthop. 2015;9:465–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu A, Lehman WB. Persistent clubfoot deformity following treatment by the Ponseti method. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012;21:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester R. Problems with the upper limb in arthrogryposis. J Child Orthop. 2015;9:473–476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ezaki M. Treatment of the upper limb in the child with arthrogryposis. Hand Clin. 2000;16:703–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heest A, James MA, Lewica A, et al. Posterior elbow capsulotomy with triceps lengthening for treatment of elbow extension contracture in children with arthrogryposis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1517–1523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gogola GR, Ezaki M, Oishi SN, et al. Long head of the triceps muscle transfer for active elbow flexion in arthrogryposis. Tech Hand up Extrem Surg. 2010;14:121–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lake AL, Oishi SN. Hand therapy following elbow release for passive elbow flexion and long head of the triceps transfer for active elbow flexion in children with amyoplasia. J Hand Ther. 2015;28:222–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassier A, Wicart P, Dubousset J, et al. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Long-term follow-up from birth until skeletal maturity. J Child Orthop. 2009;3:383–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson WO, Speck GJ, Vicari V, et al. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. A long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;194:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. Long-term outcome for patients with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Child Orthop. 2015;9:449–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartley J, Baker S, Whittaker K. Living with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a survey. APCP J. 2013;4:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification on function, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hall JG, Froster-Iskenius UG, Allanson JE. Handbook of normal physical measurements. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion. A guide to goniometry. 4th ed. Philadelphia, USA: F.A. Davis Company; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Daniels and Worthingham’s muscle testing. Techniques of manual examination. 8th ed. Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Florence JM, Pandya S, King WM, et al. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle test (Medical Research Council scale) grades in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. Phys Ther. 1992;72:115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beninato M, O'Kane KS, Sullivan PE. Relationship between motor FIM and muscle strength in lower cervical-level spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15:625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlini L, Mazzone ES, Solari A, et al. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg RJ, Fidler V, Oosterhuis HJ. Hand-held myometry: reference values. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1991;54:244–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biometrics Ltd [Internet]. Newport (UK): Hand Dynamometer and Pinchmeter [cited 2017 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.biometricsltd.com/h500.htm
   Google Scholar
• Goodson A, McGregor AH, Douglas J, et al. Direct, quantitative clinical assessment of hand function: usefulness and reproducibility. Man Ther. 2007;12:144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, et al. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The FIM System [Internet]. New York (US): [updated 2014; cited 2017 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.udsmr.org/Documents/The_FIM_Instrument_Background_Structure_and_Usefulness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Gudjonsson G, Rodhe M, et al. The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996;28:51–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, et al. (1993) A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, et al. Functional independence staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White DK, Wilson JC, Keysor JJ. Measures of adult general functional status: SF‐36 Physical Functioning Subscale (PF‐10), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Osteoarthritis‐Function‐Computer Adaptive Test (OA‐Function‐CAT). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PM, Illig SB, Fielder RC, et al. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen H, Andresen IL, Mengshoel AM. Kortvokst i Norge: Yrkesdeltakelse, kroppsplager, bruk av helsetjenester og trygdeytelser – en tverrsnittsstudie. [Short stature in Norway: Employment participation, body ailments, use of health and social security benefits – a cross-sectional study]. Fysioterapeuten. 2010;77:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wekre LL, Frøslie KF, Haugen L, et al. A population-based study of demographical variables and ability to perform activities of daily living in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway [Internet]. Befolkningens utdanningsnivå, [Population’s level of education, by October 2015] [cited 2017 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/utdanning/statistikker/utniv/aar/2016-06-20
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway [Internet]. Bø TB, Håland I. Funksjonshemma på arbeidsmarknaden. [Disabled in labor]. Rapport 2009/10, Statistisk sentralbyrå, Norge [cited 2017 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp_200910/rapp_200910.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kroksmark AK, Kimber E, Jerre R, et al. Muscle involvement and motor function in amyoplasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:1757–1767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kowalczyk B, Felus J. Ponseti casting and achilles release versus classic casting and soft tissue releases for the initial treatment of arthrogrypotic clubfeet. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:1072–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway [Internet] Høyde for sesjonspliktige 2012 [Men's height by starting in Military service 2012] [Cited 2017 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.ssb.no/a/aarbok/tab/tab-109.html
   Google Scholar
• Júlíusson PB, Roelants M, Nordal E, et al. Growth references for 0–19 year-old Norwegian children for length/height, weight, body mass index and head circumference. Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40:220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarskog D, Bjerknes R. Veksthormonbehandling ved ideopatisk kortvoksthet. [Growth hormone treatment in idiopathic short stature]. Pediatrisk Endokrinologi. 2000;14:5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen H, Andresen IL, Naess EE, et al. Health status of adults with short stature: a comparison with the normal population and one well-known chronic disease (rheumatoid arthritis). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. [Internet] Global database on Body Mass Index. BMI classification. [cited 2017 Mar 29].Available from: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html
   Google Scholar
• Riemer G, Steen U. Amyoplasia: a case report of an old woman. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:950–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar