556
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Development of the Italian version of the trunk impairment scale in subjects with acute and chronic stroke. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 66-73 | Received 08 Dec 2016, Accepted 27 Aug 2017, Published online: 10 Sep 2017

References

  • Di Monaco M, Trucco M, Di Monaco R, et al. The relationship between initial trunk control or postural balance and inpatient rehabilitation outcome after stroke: a prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:543–554.
  • Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35(Suppl 2):ii7–ii11.
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Van de Winckel A, et al. Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:387–394.
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, et al. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:326–334.
  • Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:451–458.
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Feys H, et al. Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1023–1028.
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, et al. Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2007;78:694–698.
  • Gjelsvik B, Breivik K, Verheyden G, et al. The Trunk Impairment Scale: modified to ordinal scales in the Norwegian version. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1385–1395.
  • Lombardi B, Orioli A, Casavola D, et al. The Italian version of the Trunk Impairment Scale: development and psychometric properties. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:516–520.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ispor task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Heal. 2005;8:94–104.
  • Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, et al. “Regent Suit” training improves recovery of motor and daily living activities in subjects with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;27:792–802.
  • Galeoto G, Lauta A, Palumbo A, et al. The Barthel index: Italian translation, adaptation and validation. Int J Neurol Neurother. 2015;2. DOI:10.23937/2378-3001/2/2/1028
  • Pallicino P, Snyder W, Granger C. The NIH stroke scale and the FIM in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1992;23:919.
  • Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Ricupero C, et al. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke. 1997;28:1382–1385.
  • Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, et al. Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:760–766.e1.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
  • Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102–109.
  • Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459–468.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Boca Raton (FL): Academic Press; 1977.
  • Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–S189.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1204–1217.
  • Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39:561–577.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
  • de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  • Verheyden G, Kersten P. Investigating the internal validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) using Rasch analysis: the TIS 2.0. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:2127–2137.
  • Schuller W, Ostelo RW, Janssen R, et al. The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:53.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.