Development of an observational measure of therapy engagement for pediatric rehabilitation

References

• King G, Currie M, Petersen P. Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: amotivational framework. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014;9:2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S, Ziviani J, King G, et al. Understanding engagement in home-based interactive computer play: perspectives of children with unilateral cerebral palsy and their caregivers. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36:343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Smart E, Aulakh A, McDougall C, et al. Optimizing engagement in goal pursuit with youth with physical disabilities attending life skills and transition programs: an exploratory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:2029–2038.
   Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kovarsky D. Engagement in clinical interaction: an introduction. Semin Speech Lang. 2009;30:5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Rezze B, Law M, Eva K, et al. Development of a generic fidelity measure for rehabilitation intervention research for children with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:737–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock R, Priester MA, Iachini AL, et al. A review of family engagement measures for adolescent substance use services. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24:3700–3710.
   Google Scholar
• Hart T. Treatment definition in complex rehabilitation interventions. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19:824–840.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte J, Hart T. It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:639–652.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE, Wassell G. Predictors of barriers to treatment and therapeutic change in outpatient therapy for antisocial children and their families. Ment Health Serv Res. 2000;2:27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Karver MS, Handelsman JB, Fields S, et al. A theoretical model of common process factors in youth and family therapy. Ment Health Serv Res. 2005;7:35–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim HS, Munson MR, McKay MM. Engagement in mental health treatment among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2012;29:241–266.
   Google Scholar
• King G. The role of the therapist in therapeutic change: how knowledge from mental health can inform pediatric rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;1:121–38.
   Google Scholar
• D'Arrigo R, Ziviani J, Poulsen AA, et al. Child and parent engagement in therapy: what is the key? Aust Occup Ther J .2017;64:340–343.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffin M, Valle LA, Funderburk B, et al. A motivational intervention can improve retention in PCIT for low-motivation child welfare clients. Child Maltreat. 2009;14:356–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Duffee DE, Steinke C, et al. Youth engagement and service dosage in a mandated setting: a study of residential treatment centers. Child Youth Serv Rev.. 2011;33:1515–1526.
   Google Scholar
• Whiston SC, Sexton TL. An overview of psychotherapy outcome research: implications for practice. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1993;24:43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD. A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomesJ Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27:99–121.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW. A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27:89–97.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Bartlett DJ, Currie M, et al. Measuring the expertise of pediatric rehabilitation therapists. INT J DISABIL DEV ED. 2008;55:5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin P, King G, Evans J, et al. Solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation: an integrated model for practice. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33:467–483.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Desmarais C, Lindsay S, et al. The roles of effective communication and client engagement in delivering culturally sensitive care to immigrant parents of children with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1372–1381.
   Google Scholar
• Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Human technologies in rehabilitation: ‘who’ and ‘how’ we are with our clients. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1907–1911.
   Google Scholar
• Treasure J, Schmidt U. Ready, willing and able to change: motivational aspects of the assessment and treatment of eating disorders. Eur Eat Disorders Rev. 2001;9:4–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drieschner KH, Boomsma A. The Treatment Engagement Rating scale (TER) for forensic outpatient treatment: description, psychometric properties, and norms. Psychol Crime Law. 2008;14:299–315.
   Google Scholar
• Joe GW, Broome KM, Rowan-Szal GA, et al. Measuring patient attributes and engagement in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:183–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drieschner KH, Lammers SMM, Van Der Staak CPF. Treatment motivation: an attempt for clarification of an ambiguous concept. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;23:1115–1137.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson RA, Borkovec TD. Relationship of client participation to psychotherapy. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1989;20:155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz JS, Franklin ME, Zoellner LA, et al. Treatment compliance and outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Modif. 2002;26:447–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drieschner KH, Boomsma A. The treatment motivation scales for forensic outpatient treatment (TMS-F). Assessment. 2008;15:224–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE, Holland L, Crowley M. Family experience of barriers to treatment and premature termination from child therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65:453–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome KM, Joe GW, Simpson DD. Engagement models for adolescents in DATOS-A. J Adolesc Res. 2001;16:608–623.
   Google Scholar
• Melnick G, Wexler HK, Chaple M, et al. The contribution of consensus within staff and client groups as well as concordance between staff and clients to treatment engagement. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;31:277–285.
   Google Scholar
• Tatla SK, Jarus T, Virji-Babul N, et al. The development of the pediatric motivation scale for rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;82:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ‘what’ and the ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. PSYCHOL INQ. 2000;11:227–268.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Kielhofner G, Lai J-S. An examination of the measurement properties of the pediatric volitional questionnaire. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2005;25:39–57.
   Google Scholar
• D'Arrigo R, Ziviani J, Copley JA, et al. Measures of parent engagement for children receiving developmental or rehabilitation interventions: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Ambady N, Bernieri FJ, Richeson JA. Toward a histology of social behavior: judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2000;32:201–271.
   Google Scholar
• Ambady N, Rosenthal R. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1992;111:256–274.
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger J. Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory [Monograph No. 9]. Psychol Rep. 1957;3:635–694.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Schwellnus H, Servais M, et al. Solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation: investigating transformative experiences and outcomes for families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Di Rezze B, Law M, Eva K, et al. Therapy behaviours in paediatric rehabilitation: essential attributes for intervention with children with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2014;36:16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos ED. The development of training programs to increase accuracy with different rating tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1986;38:76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos ED. A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1984;69:581–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan LE, Sulsky LM. Impact of frame-of-reference and behavioral observation training on alternative training effectiveness criteria in a Canadian military sample. Human Performance. 2001;14:3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Shepherd TA, Servais M, et al. Developing authentic clinical simulations for effective listening and communication in pediatric rehabilitation service delivery. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2016;19:284–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan RC, Biklen S. Qualitative research for education. 4th ed. Boston (MA): Ally & Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Brown RD, Hauenstein NM. Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods. 2005;8:165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. Development of a measure to assess youth Self-reported Experiences of Activity Settings (SEAS). International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2014;61:44–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Rigby P, Avery L. Revised Measure of Environmental Qualities of Activity Settings (MEQAS) for youth leisure and life skills activity settings. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1509–1520.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan GA, Busch-Rossnagel NA, Barrett KC, et al. The Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ): a manual about its development, psychometrics, and use. 2009 [Internet]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/a/rams.colostate.edu/georgemorgan/mastery-motivation.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Imms C, Stewart D, et al. A transactional framework for pediatric rehabilitation: shifting the focus to situated contexts, transactional processes, and adaptive developmental outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. Forthcoming. [cited 2017 Apr 11]. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2017.1309583
   Google Scholar
• King G. A relational goal-oriented model of optimal service delivery to children and families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29:384–408.
   Google Scholar