The ICF has made a difference to functioning and disability measurement and statistics

References

• World Health Organization. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:565–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011. [Internet]; Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/013. Geneva: WHO; 2002. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hurst R. The international disability rights movement and the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:572–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, et al. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:281–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems H, de Kleijn-de Vrankrijker M. Work disability in the Netherlands: data, conceptual aspects, and perspectives. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:510–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostansjek N, et al. WHO’s ICF and functional status information in health records. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003;24:77–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneidert M, Hurst R, Miller J, et al. The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzoni LI, Greenberg MS. Capturing and classifying functional status information in administrative databases. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003;24:61–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo N, Poissant L, Ahmed S, et al. Incorporating the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driller E, Pritzbuer EV, Pfaff H. Care required by disabled persons: are official severe disability statistics good enough for requirement analyses? Gesundheitswesen. 2004;66:319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide AH, Loeb ME. Data and statistics on disability in developing countries. DFID disability knowledge and research program. London: DFID; 2005. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/dfid-research-outputs/data-and-statistics-on-disability-in-developing-countries
   Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, et al. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:281–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelsma J. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster C, O’Hara K. Knowledge representation with ontologies: present challenges – future possibilities. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2007;65:563–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago (IL) and London (UK): The University of Chicago Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Cox D, Donnelly C. Principles of applied statistics. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey JW. The future of data analysis. Ann Math Statist. 1962;33:1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenweger J. Developing applications of the ICF in education systems: addressing issues of knowledge creation, management and transfer. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;351087–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden RH. ICF and the disability universe: specificity in a complex world [dissertation]. Sydney, Australia: The University of Sydney; 2016. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/15782
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work. 2010;35:399–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1386–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Fundamental principles of official statistics (A/RES/68/261). New York: United Nations; 2014. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/gp/fundprinciples.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Falagas M, Pitsouni E, Malietzis G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22:338–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikki S. Google Scholar compared to Web of Science: a literature review. Nord J Inform Liter High Educ. 2009;1:41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Yang K, Meho L. Citation analysis: a comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST). 2006 Nov 3–8; Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hendershot GE, Crews JE. Toward international comparability of survey statistics on visual impairment: the DISTAB project. J Vis Impair Blind. 2006;100:11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM. Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek N, Good A, Madden RH, et al. Counting disability: global and national estimation. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1065–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabariego C, Oberhauser C, Posarac A, et al. Measuring disability: comparing the impact of two data collection approaches on disability rates. IJERPH. 2015;12:10329–10351.
   Google Scholar
• Madans J, Mont D, Loeb M. Comments on Sabariego et al. Measuring disability: comparing the impact of two data collection approaches on disability rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 10329–10351. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svestkova O. Conceptual framework for rehabilitation in the Czech Republic: a proposal. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:798–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Classifying and reporting functional status. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington DC, USA: CDC; 2002. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/010617rp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howard D, Nieuwenhuijsen ER, Saleeby P. Health promotion and education: application of the ICF in the US and Canada using an ecological perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:942–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek N. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden R, Ferreira M, Einfeld S, et al. New directions in health care and disability: the need for a shared understanding of human functioning. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36:458–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:932–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM. Toward a common language of disablement. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:1165–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässel A, Finger ME, Cieza A, et al. Vocational rehabilitation from the client’s perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:167–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand NM, Belting J, Fekete C, et al. All talk, no action?: the global diffusion and clinical implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:550–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Hopfe M, Marshall R, Riewpaiboon, et al. Improving casemix systems by adding functioning information. Poster D051p. Presented at WHO-FIC Annual Meeting, 2011, 29 Oct–6 Nov, Cape Town, South Africa. 2017. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/network/meeting2011/en/
   Google Scholar
• Madden R, Marshall R, Race S. ICF and casemix models for healthcare funding: use of the WHO family of classifications to improve casemix. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1074–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden R, Choi C, Sykes C. The ICF as a framework for national data: the introduction of ICF into Australian data dictionaries. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. The future of disability in America. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Post MWM, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Madden R. Design and quality of ICF-compatible data items for national disability support services. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:758–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Tao W, Haley SM. Blending activity and participation sub-domains of the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1742–1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seekins T, Shunkamolah W, Bertsche M, et al. A systematic scoping review of measures of participation in disability and rehabilitation research: a preliminary report of findings. Disabil Health J. 2012;5:224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Peter C, Müller R, et al. The personal factors of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the literature - a systematic review and content analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1089–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Lollar D, Björck-Åkesson E, et al. ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: pandora’s box of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Sykes CR, Madden RC, et al. Do we really need to open a classification box on personal factors in ICF? Disabil Rehabil. 2015;38:1327–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson G, Carrothers L, Mulhorn K. Comparing disability survey questions in five countries: a study using ICF to guide comparisons. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:665–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall J, Miller L. Classification of chronic health conditions in children and youth - measuring chronic health condition and disability as distinct concepts in national surveys of school-aged children in Canada: a comprehensive review with recommendations based on the ICD-10 and ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:922–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Disability and its relationship to health conditions and other factors (AIHW Cat. No. DIS 37). Canberra: AIHW; 2004. [Internet]; [cited 2015 June 20]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id =6442467670
   Google Scholar
• Crews JE, Campbell VA. Vision impairment and hearing loss among community-dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:823–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Scarborough AA, Hebbeler KM. ICF and ICD codes provide a standard language of disability in young children. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. Identification of candidate categories of the international classification of functioning disability and health (ICF) for a generic ICF core set based on regression modelling. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Marsh AP, et al. Measuring disability in older adults: the international classification system of functioning, disability and health (ICF) framework. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2008;8:48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack J, Harrison LJ, McLeod S, et al. A nationally representative study of the association between communication impairment at 4-5 years and children’s life activities at 7-9 years. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54:1328–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GC, Crews JE. Health disparities among workers and nonworkers with functional limitations: implications for improving employment in the United States. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1479–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford VM, Ewen S, Webb GR, et al. The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to understand the health and functioning experiences of people with chronic conditions from the person perspective: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;37:655–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostan C, Oberhauser C, Stucki G, et al. Which environmental factors are associated with performance when controlling for capacity? BMC Public Health. 2015;15:508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maierhofer S, Almazan-Isla J, Alcalde-Cabero E, et al. Prevalence and features of ICF-disability in Spain as captured by the 2008 national disability survey. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kembhavi G, Darrah J, Payne K, et al. Adults with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy: a mapping review of long-term outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:610–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi A, Leonardi M, Cabello M, et al. Application of ICF in clinical settings across Europe. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(Suppl. 1):S17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek N, Rubinelli S, Escorpizo R, et al. Assessing the impact of health conditions using the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1475–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb M, Kohler F, Robinson Nicol MM, et al. ICD-11: a comprehensive picture of health, an update on the ICD-ICF joint use initiative. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian ICF user guide. Version 1.0 (Cat. No. DIS 33). Canberra: AIHW; 2003. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id =6442455729
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2013. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/drafticfpracticalmanual2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ICF Education. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Helsinki, Finland: ICF; 2017. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 8]. Available from: http://icfeducation.org/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Health Organization family of international classifications network. Geneva: WHO; 2017. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 8]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/network/en/
   Google Scholar
• Madden R, Glozier N, Mpofu E, et al. Eligibility, the ICF and the UN convention: Australian perspectives. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden R, Fortune N, Cheeseman D, et al. Fundamental questions before recording or measuring functioning and disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Dune T, Lukersmith S, et al. The relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in monitoring and evaluating community-based rehabilitation (CBR). Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:826–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donovan MA, Good A. Towards comparability of data: using the ICF to map the contrasting definitions of disability in Irish surveys and census, 2000-2006. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(Suppl. 1):S9–S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trani JF, Bakhshi P. Challenges for assessing disability prevalence: the case of Afghanistan. ALTER - Eur J Disabil Res. 2008;2:44–64.
   Google Scholar
• Solipaca A, Battisti A, De Palma E, et al. Revision of Italian disability statistics according to the ICF conceptual and semantic framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(Suppl. 1):S22–S39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, ageing and carers, Australia: summary of findings, 2012. Canberra: ABS; 2012: pp. 1–26. (Cat. No. 44300). 2012. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/4430.02012
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Unmet need for disability services: effectiveness of funding and remaining shortfalls. (Cat. No. DIS26). Canberra: AIHW; 2002. [Internet]; Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id =60129552870
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Welfare 2005: the seventh biennial welfare report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (Cat. No. AU S65). Canberra: AIHW; 2005. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id =6442453409
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. (Cat No. 4704.0. IHW 14). Canberra: ABS; 2005. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id =6442458575
   Google Scholar
• Jelsma J, Maart S, Eide A, et al. Who gets the disability grant in South Africa? An analysis of the characteristics of recipients in urban and rural areas. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1139–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb ME, Eide AH, Mont D. Approaching the measurement of disability prevalence: the case of Zambia. ALTER - Eur J Disabil Res. 2008;2:32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ayazi T, Lien L, Eide AH, et al. Disability associated with exposure to traumatic events: results from a cross-sectional community survey in South Sudan. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. The prevalence of person-perceived participation restriction in community-dwelling older adults. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1471–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virués-Ortega J, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Seijo-Martínez M, et al. Prevalence of disability in a composite ≥75 year-old population in Spain: a screening survey based on the international classification of functioning. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell L. Can the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provide high-level descriptions of Scottish physiotherapy cases? Adv Physiother. 2008;10:119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. Factors associated with restricted mobility outside the home in community-dwelling adults ages fifty years and older with knee pain: an example of use of the international classification of functioning to investigate participation restriction. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1381–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maart S, Eide AH, Jelsma J, et al. Environmental barriers experienced by urban and rural disabled people in South Africa. Disabil Soc. 2007;22:357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Ailshire JA, Bader M, et al. Mobility disability and the urban built environment. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Moreno J, Martinez-Aran A, Gadelrab HF, et al. The role and impact of contextual factors on functioning in patients with bipolar disorder. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(Suppl. 1):94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francescutti C, Gongolo F, Simoncello A, et al. Description of the person-environment interaction: methodological issues and empirical results of an Italian large-scale disability assessment study using an ICF-based protocol. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnadottir SA, Gunnarsdottir ED, Stenlund H, et al. Determinants of self-rated health in old age: a population-based, cross-sectional study using the international classification of functioning. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nubila H, de Paula AR, Marcelino MA, et al. Evaluating the model of classification and valuation of disabilities used in Brazil and defining the elaboration and adoption of a unique model for all the country: Brazilian interministerial workgroup task. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu W-T, Yen C-F, Teng S-W, et al. Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: experiences in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francescutti C, Martinuzzi A, Leonardi M, et al. Eight years of ICF in Italy: principles, results and future perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(Suppl. 1):S4–S7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Raggi A, et al. Training on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): the ICF-DIN basic and the ICF-DIN advanced course developed by the disability Italian network. J Headache Pain. 2005;6:159–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okawa Y, Ueda S. Implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in national legislation and policy in Japan. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31:73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenweger J. Development of an ICF-based eligibility procedure for education in Switzerland. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M. Measuring health and disability: supporting policy development. The European MHADIE project. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(Suppl. 1):S1–S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre A, Tempest S. Two steps forward, one step back? A commentary on the disease-specific core sets of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1475–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Llewellyn G, Stucki G. Think before you measure. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1045–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Glozier N, Fortune N, et al. In search of an integrative measure of functioning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:5815–5832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt JD, Miller J, Stucki G, et al. Measuring impact of environmental factors on human functioning and disability: a review of various scientific approaches. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2151–2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl R, Stucki G, Grill E, et al. Graphical models illustrated complex associations between variables describing human functioning. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:922–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Cen SY. Model of disablement and recovery: knowledge translation in rehabilitation research and practice. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1892–1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouquette A, Badley EM, Falissard B, et al. Moderators, mediators, and bidirectional relationships in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework: an empirical investigation using a longitudinal design and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Soc Sci Med. 2015;135:133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Bedell G, Law M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:1030–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden R. Participation and environment: out of the melting pot and into …? In: Altman BA, Barnartt SN, editors. Research in social science and disability. Vol. 4, International views on disability measures: moving towards comparative measurement. West Yorkshire: Emerald Publishing Group; 2006. p. 225–246.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Granlund M, Thyberg I, et al. Important aspects of participation and participation restrictions in people with a mild intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1264–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okawa Y, Ueda S, Shuto K, et al. Development of criteria for the qualifiers of activity and participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health based on the accumulated data of population surveys. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31:97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okochi J, Utsunomiya S, Takahashi T. Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;31:97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler F, Connolly C, Sakaria A, et al. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter- and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an ADL assessment tool. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:881–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley R, Madden RH, Brentnall J, et al. Testing and development of an instrument for self-report of participation and related environmental factors – Your Ideas about Participation and Environment (YIPE) among adults with brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;8288:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther. 2006;86:726–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manns PJ, Darrah J. Linking research and clinical practice in physical therapy: strategies for integration. Physiotherapy. 2006;92:88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almansa J, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Garin O, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: development of capacity and performance scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1400–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogonowski J, Kronk R, Rice C, et al. Inter-rater reliability in assigning ICF codes to children with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:353–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(Suppl. 2):15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1225–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, et al. Comparing the content of participation instruments using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunford C, Bannigan K, Wales L. Measuring activity and participation outcomes for children and youth with acquired brain injury: an occupational therapy perspective. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Bjorbaekmo W, Carlberg EB, et al. Assessment of everyday functioning in young children with disabilities: an ICF-based analysis of concepts and content of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:489–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger B, Tennant A, Brinkhof M, et al. Enhanced informed decision-making in the health system: ICF as a standard for reporting functioning information. Annual meeting of WHO Family of International Classifications Network, 2014, Oct 11–17. Barcelona, Spain. 2014. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.docfor.us/background-SZCRdTw
   Google Scholar
• Tucker CA, Cieza A, Riley AW, et al. Concept analysis of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1677–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Finkelman S, Hurley P, et al. Participation of children with physical disabilities: relationships with diagnosis, physical function, and demographic variables. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11:156–162.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Petrenchik T, King G, et al. Perceived environmental barriers to recreational, community, and school participation for children and youth with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1636–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Norweg A, Haley SM. Achieving meaningful measurements of ICF concepts. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:963–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, et al. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark S, Hollingsworth HH, Morgan KA, et al. Development of a measure of receptivity of the physical environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:123–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, et al. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:434–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, et al. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1793–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, et al. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1324–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, et al. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold SRC, Riches VC, Parmenter TR, et al. The I-CAN: using e-Health to get people the support they need. Electr J Health Inform. 2009;4:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman D, Madden R, Bundy A. Your ideas about participation and environment: a new self-report instrument. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1903–1908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Lukersmith S, Millington MJ, et al. Participatory monitoring of community-based rehabilitation and other disability-inclusive development programmes: the development of a manual and menu. DCID. 2016;26:26–52.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Disability Research and Policy. Monitoring manual and menu for CBR and other community-based disability inclusive development programs. Sydney: Centre for Disability Research and Policy; 2014. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 8]. Available from: http://sydney.edu.au/health-sciences/cdrp/projects/cbr-monitoring.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Francescutti C, Frattura L, Troiano R, et al. Towards a common disability assessment framework: theoretical and methodological issues for providing public services and benefits using ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(Suppl. 1):S8–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myezwa H, Buchalla CM, Jelsma J, et al. HIV/AIDS: use of the ICF in Brazil and South Africa - comparative data from four cross-sectional studies. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KL, Tseng MH, Shieh JY, et al. Determinants of quality of life in children with cerebral palsy: a comprehensive biopsychosocial approach. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:520–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threats TT. Towards an international framework for communication disorders: use of the ICF. J Commun Disord. 2006;39:251–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran R, Worrall L, Hickson L. Environmental factors that influence communication between patients and their healthcare providers in acute hospital stroke units: an observational study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46:30–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt S, Worrall L, Pearson C, et al. “Well it has to be language-related”: speech-language pathologists’ goals for people with aphasia and their families. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:317–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs N, Dixon D, Rasmussen S, et al. Patient preoperative expectations of total hip replacement in European orthopedic centers. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:1521–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberg HL, Sandvik L, Ostensjo S. Reliability and applicability of the ICF in coding problems, resources and goals of persons with multiple injuries. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Preuper HRS, et al. Work status and chronic low back pain: exploring the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Appleton J, Pridmore S. Thematic categorization of coroners’ reports of Indigenous and non-indigenous suicide using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Suicidol Online. 2015;6:33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Steel EJ, Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP. The role of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health and quality criteria for improving assistive technology service delivery in Europe. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(Suppl. 1):S55–S61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF checklist version 2.1a, clinician form. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 8]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfchecklist.pdf?ua =1
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, editors. ICF core sets: manual for clinical practice. ICF research branch, in cooperation with the WHO collaborating centre for the family of international classifications in Germany (at DIMDI). Cambridge (MA): Hogrefe Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tavener M, Thijsen A, Hubbard IJ, et al. Acknowledging how older Australian women experience life after stroke: how does the WHO 18-Item Brief ICF Core Set for Stroke compare? Health Care Women Int. 2015;36:1311–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaessel A, Kirchberger I, Stucki G, et al. Does the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for breast cancer capture the problems in functioning treated by physiotherapists in women with breast cancer? Physiotherapy. 2011;97:33–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett DJ, Macnab J, Macarthur C, et al. Advancing rehabilitation research: an interactionist perspective to guide question and design. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1169–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett D, Mpofu E, Madden R. Reflective action assessment with a prospective clinical problem solving tool in the context of rehabilitation medicine: an illustrative case study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1048–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman S, Valente TW, Rohrbach LA, et al. Translation in the health professions: converting science into action. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29:7–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, United Nations Economic and Social Council. Training manual on disability statistics. Bangkok: United Nations; 2008, [Internet]; [cited 2017 Nov 3]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/censuskb20/Attachments/2008ESCAP_TrainManDisabty-GUID7c0789538 9164cdab0b0b7609136f117.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Godbee K, Sigmundsdottir L. A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:729–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek N. Semantic interoperability – role and operationalization of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Int J Integr Care. 2009;9. Available from: http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/352
   Google Scholar
• Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment. Am Psychol. 1995;50:741–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge LM. A global disability indicator. J Aging Studies. 1997;11:337–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K. Big data. Boston and New York: Mariner Books and Houghton Miffler Harcourt; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bruyère SM, Van Looy SA, Peterson DB. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: contemporary literature overview. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, et al. Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaruss JS, Quesal RW. Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering (OASES): documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. J Fluency Disord. 2006;31:90–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østerås N, Brage S, Garratt A, et al. Functional ability in a population: normative survey data and reliability for the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan SM, Tung LC, Yeh CY, et al. ICF-CY based assessment tool for children with autism. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar