The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a low-cost, virtual-reality based, upper-limb stroke rehabilitation device: a mixed methods study

References

• Stroke Association. State of the Nation Stroke Statistics [Internet]; 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 16]. Available from: http://www.stroke.org.uk/resource-sheet-nation-stroke-statistics
   Google Scholar
• McHugh G, Swain ID, Jenkinson D. Treatment components for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a survey of UK national practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:925–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes A, Burridge J, Demain S, et al. Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36:1480–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sodring KM, et al. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin G, Rushton A, Olver P, et al. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy’s identification of national research priorities for physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique. Physiotherapy. 2012;98:260–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. Stroke rehabilitation in adults [Internet]; 2013 [cited 2016 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG162
   Google Scholar
• CSP. A new ambition for stroke. A consultation on national response strategy response from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. London: CSP; [Internet] 2007. [cited 2017 Apr 11]. Available from: http://www.csp.org.uk/press-releases/200712/05/csp-responds-new-department-health-stroke-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Barker R, Brauer S. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1213–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: Department of Health; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh G, Swain ID. A comparison between reported and ideal patient-to-therapist ratios for stroke rehabilitation. Health. 2013;05:105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Donoso Brown EV, Dudgeon BJ, Gutman K, et al. Understanding upper extremity home programs and the use of gaming technology for persons after stroke. Disabil Health J. 2015;8:507–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkiewicz M, Marzolini S, Oh P. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;18:277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrie W. The dog ate my trainers. Synapse. 2011;25:24.
   Google Scholar
• Disler P, Wade D. Should all stroke rehabilitation be home based? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:733–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung YX, Huang PC, Chen KT, et al. What do stroke patients look for in game-based rehabilitation: a survey study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e3032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, et al. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen R, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver K, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation [systematic review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:1–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ballester BR, Maier M, San Segundo R, et al. Reinforcement-induced movement therapy: a novel approach for overcoming learned non-use in chronic stroke patients. Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), 2015, IEEE, p. 183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian SK, Lourenco CB, Chilingaryan G, et al. Arm motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke: randomized control trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiper P, Piron L, Turolla A, et al. The effectiveness of reinforced feedback in virtual environment in the first 12 months after stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2011;45:436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek K, Sanson-Fisher R, Mackenzie L, et al. Interventions to aid patient adherence to physiotherapist prescribed self-management strategies: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2016;102:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Ceravolo MG, Agosti M, et al. Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a possible role in recovery of functional dexterity. A randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:456–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekna M, Pekny M, Nilsson M. Modulation of neural plasticity as a basis for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2012;43:2819–2828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celnik P, Stefan K, Hummel F, et al. Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neuroimage. 2006;29:677–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007;36(Suppl2):T164–T173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: integrating various assistive technology outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenek KE, Wolfe DL, Hitzig SL. A scoping review of video gaming in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;27:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson K, Pollock A, Bugge C, et al. Commercial gaming devices for stroke upper limb rehabilitation: a survey of current practice. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:454–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warland A, Kilbride C, Tsekleves E, et al. ReWiiRe (Research in Wii Rehabilitation): user involvement in the development of a personalised rehabilitation system for arm re-education after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(Suppl 2):27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingham J, Adie K, Turner D, et al. experience of the Nintendo Wii Sports after stroke: qualitative study of the trial of Wii in stroke (TWIST). Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo LY, Yin T, Xu D, et al. A feasibility study using interactive commercial off-the-shelf computer gaming in upper limb rehabilitation in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:437–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson K, Pollock A, Bugge C, et al. Commercial gaming devices for stroke upper limb rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:479–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsekleves E, Paraskevopoulos I, Warland A, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a novel low cost VR-based upper limb stroke rehabilitation platform using Wii technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo WP, Muthalib M, Yamin S, et al. Does a combination of virtual reality, neuromodulation and neuroimaging provide a comprehensive platform for neurorehabilitation? – a narrative review of the literature. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange B, Koenig S, Chang CY, et al. Designing informed game-based rehabilitation tasks leveraging advances in virtual reality. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1863–1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower K, Louie J, Landersrocha Y, et al. Clinical feasibility of interactive motion-controlled games for stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2015;12:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, MacIntyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex Interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford JR, et al. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1139–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saposnik G, Levin M, Outcome Research Canada Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011;42:1380–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver K, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual Reality for stroke rehabilitation (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD008349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrzak E, Cotea C, Pullman S. Using commercial video games for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: is this the way of the future? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21:152–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Lange B, George S, et al. Virtual Reality for stroke rehabilitation (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(11):CD008349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong KH, Loh YJ, Thia E, et al. Efficacy of a virtual reality commercial gaming device in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized, controlled study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, Legg L, et al. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD006755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housman S, Scott K, Reinkensmeyer D. A randomised controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byl N, Abrams G, Pitsch E, et al. Chronic stroke survivors achieve comparable outcomes following virtual task specific repetitive training guided by a wearable robotic orthosis (UL-EXO7) and actual task specific repetitive training guided by a physical therapist. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:343–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsekleves E, Skordoulis D, Paraskevopoulos I, et al. Personalised stroke rehabilitation intervention using open source 3D software and the Wii Remote Plus. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologie; 2012 Sept 10–12; Laval, France. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Martin S. Patient- and trial-specific barriers to participation in cardiovascular randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:762–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskevopoulos I, Tsekeleves E, Warland A, et al. Virtual reality based holistic framework: A tool for participatory development of customised playful therapy sessions for motor rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games). 2016 Sept 7–9; Barcelona, Spain. IEEE 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekleves E, Skordoulis D, Paraskevopoulos I, et al. Wii your health: a low-cost wireless system for home rehabilitation after stroke using Wii remotes and its expansions and blender. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference Biomedical Engineering (Biomed 2011). Calgary: ACTA Press; 2011. p. 502–509.
   Google Scholar
• Witmer B, Singer M. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence. 1998;7:225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H. The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence. 2001;10:266–281.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, et al. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:787–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011;42:1787–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin A, Hill H, Pomeroy V. Rough guide to the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Physiotherapy. 2003;89:751–763.
   Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32:1627–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle R. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg R, Wood V. The validation of the subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, et al. A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:732–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers A, Harris T, Victor C, et al. Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. London: Sage; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, et al. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:453–463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mat Rosly M, Mat Rosly H, Davis G, et al. Exergaming for individuals with neurological disability: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:727–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett A, Meyvis T, Nelson L, et al. You’re having fun when time flies: the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychol Sci. 2010;21:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto Y, Hoshiyama M. Alteration of time perception in young and elderly people during jigsaw puzzle tasks with different complexities. Occup Ther Int. 2011;18:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien E, Anastasio P, Bushman B. Time crawls when you’re not having fun: feeling entitled makes dull tasks drag on. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011;37:1287–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow. London: Rider; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Roberts S, Pagliaro S, et al. Optimal experience and optimal identity: a multinational study of the associations between flow and social identity. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pageau M, Surgan S. Do we have fun when time flies? Psi Chi J Psychol Res. 2015;20:125–135.
   Google Scholar
• Abuhamdeh S, Csikszentmihalyi M. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal-directed activities. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38:317–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Rep. 2007;21:398–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vilet P, Wolf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein C. Knowledge of results and motor learning-implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991;71:140–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Salmela L, Souza R, Viana R, et al. Higher doses of virtual reality therapy are required to induce changes in upper limb function and quality of life after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(Suppl 3):242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang S, You S, Hallett M, et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2218–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J, Mountain G, Hammerton J. A review of the evidence underpinning the use of visual and auditory feedback for computer technology in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:465–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fetters M, Curry L, Creswell J. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:2134–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry L, Nunez-Smith M. Mixed methods in health sciences research. London: Sage; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Saposnik G, Cohen L, Mamdani M, et al. Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1019–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar