The key features and role of peer support within group self-management interventions for stroke? A systematic review

References

• McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill D, Horgan F, Hickey A, et al. Long term outcome of stroke: stroke is a chronic disease with acute events. BMJ. 2008;336:461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Sobel D, Stewart AL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37:5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health Research. 2016-National-Clinical-Guideline-for-Stroke-5t-(1).pdf. 2016 [cited 2017 June 27]. Available from: https://www.strokeaudit.org/SupportFiles/Documents/Guidelines/2016-National-Clinical-Guideline-for-Stroke-5t-(1).aspx
   Google Scholar
• Warner G, Packer T, Villeneuve M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:2141–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, (NJ): Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva D. Helping people help themselves: a review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management. London (UK): The Health Foundation. 2011. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/HelpingPeopleHelpThemselves.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fryer CE, Luker JA, McDonnell MN, et al. Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;22:1–77.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A, Norris M. Self-management after stroke: time for some more questions? Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boger EJ, Demain S, Latter S. Stuck between expectation and hope - the experience of self-management for people recovering from stroke. Int J Stroke. 2012;7:19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev I, Rogers A, Kennedy A, et al. The influence of social networks on self-management support: a metasynthesis. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:719–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark E, Bennett K, Ward N, et al. One size does not fit all – stroke survivor’s views on group self-management interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Association. Feeling overwhelmed: the emotional impact of stroke. 2013 [cited 2015 May 14]. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/feeling_overwhelmed_final_web_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Catalano T, Dickson P, Kendall E, et al. The perceived benefits of the chronic disease self-management program among participants with stroke: a qualitative study. Aust J Prim Health. 2003;9:80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. Consumers and communication group resources for authors | Cochrane Consumers and Communication. [cited 2017 June 21]. Available from: https://cccrg.cochrane.org/author-resources
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance (third edition) | appendix-g-quality-appraisal-checklist-quantitative-studies-reporting-correlations-and-associations | Guidance and guidelines | NICE. 2012 [cited 2015 October 29]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg4/chapter/appendix-g-quality-appraisal-checklist-quantitative-studies-reporting-correlations-and-associations
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Voils CI, Barroso J. Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Res Sch. 2006;13:29–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anon. Our guidance - centre for reviews and dissemination, The University of York. 2009 [cited 2016 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/guidance/
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsche RC, Williams B, Jones A, et al. Chronic disease self-management for individuals with stroke, multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1136–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. 1st ed. London: SAGE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq S, Woodman J. Using mixed methods in health research. JRSM Short Rep. 2013;4:204253331347919–204253331347918.
   Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Hoffmann S, Kilkenny M, et al. A phase II multicentered, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of the stroke self-management program. Stroke. 2011;42:1673–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongbo F, Hua F, McGowan P, et al. Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shanghai, China: randomized controlled trial. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaglal SB, Haroun VA, Salbach NM, et al. Increasing access to chronic disease self-management programs in rural and remote communities using teleheaith. Telemed E-Health. 2013;19:904–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Catalano T, Kuipers P, et al. Recovery following stroke: the role of self-management education. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:735–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronish I, Goldfinger J, Negron R, et al. Effect of peer education on stroke prevention: the prevent recurrence of all inner-city strokes through education randomized controlled trial. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2014;45:3330–3336.
   Google Scholar
• Sit JWH, Yip VYB, Ko SKK, et al. A quasi-experimental study on a community-based stroke prevention programme for clients with minor stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Baum CM, Lee D, et al. The development of the improving participation after stroke self-management program (IPASS): an exploratory randomized clinical study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:284–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Spiers MJ, Doherty M, et al. The effect of self-management education following mild stroke: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24:345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DM, Stone SD, Huijbregts MP. Remote participants’ experiences with a group-based stroke self-management program using videoconference technology. Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts MPJ, Myers AM, Streiner D, et al. Implementation, process, and preliminary outcome evaluation of two community programs for persons with stroke and their care partners. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:503–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris M, Kilbride C. From dictatorship to a reluctant democracy: stroke therapists talking about self-management. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;6:32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, et al. Self-management support interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic meta-review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Mcintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. 2006. Available from: http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/42736/1/42736.pdf
   Google Scholar