Impact of robotics and human enhancement on occupation: what does it mean for rehabilitation?

References

• Wilcock A. A theory of the human need for occupation. J Occup Sci. 1993;1:17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Reed K, Hocking C, Smythe L. The interconnected meanings of occupation: the call, being‐with, possibilities. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:140–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa EJ. An introduction to occupational science. A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occup Therapy Healthcare. 1990;6:1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolbring G. Employment, disabled people and robots: what is the narrative in the academic literature and Canadian newspapers? Societies. 2016;6:15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. Ableism, enhancement medicine and the techno poor disabled. In: Healey P, Rayner S, editors. Unnatural selection: the challenges of engineering tomorrow's people. London (UK): Routledge; 2008. p. 196–208.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. 'Therapeutic', enhancement enabling, assistive devices and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: a missing lens in the enhancement regulation discourse. J Int Biotechnol Law. 2009;6:192–203.
   Google Scholar
• Buetow SA, Martínez-Martín P, McCormack B. Ultrabilitation: beyond recovery-oriented rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Nanotechnology and the transhumanization of health, medicine, and rehabilitation. In: Lee Kleinmann D, Delborne J, Cloud-Hansen K, et al., editors. Controversies in Science & Technology: Volume 3. New Rochelle (NY): Mary Ann Liebert; 2010. p. 290–303.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. Therapeutic enhancements and the view of rehabilitation educators. Dilemata Int J Appl Ethics. 2012; 8:169–183.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. HTA Initiative #23 The triangle of enhancement medicine, disabled people, and the concept of health: a new challenge for HTA, health research, and health policy Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) webpage: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR); 2005 [updated 2005]. Available from: http://www.ihe.ca/download/the_triangle_of_enhancement_medicine_disabled_people_and_the_concept_of_health_a_new_challenge_for_hta_health_research_and_health_policy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. About the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) matrix. World Health Organization; 2011 [cited 2011]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/matrix/en/
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, et al. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008;6:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Libraries J. 2009;26:91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1386–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njelesani J, Cameron D, Polatajko HJ. Occupation-for-development: expanding the boundaries of occupational science into the international development agenda. J Occup Sci. 2012;19:36–43.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Occupational Health 2017. Available from: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/population/occupational/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Domer TM. Regulatory agencies and legislation. Sourcebook of occupational rehabilitation. Boston (MA): Springer; 1998. p. 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan EM, Ahern M. Inflammatory arthritis and work disability: what is the role of occupational medicine? Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Occupational science. In: Gellman MD, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 1365–1370.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Incorporated; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:296–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canadian Society of Occupational Scientists. What is Occupational Science: Canadian Society of Occupational Scientists; 2015. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/occupationalsciencecanada//occupational-science/what-is-occupational-science
   Google Scholar
• Chai T-YE, Wolbring G. The portrayal of occupational therapy and occupational science in Canadian newspapers: a content analysis. Societies. 2016;6:18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock A, Townsend E. Occupational terminology interactive dialogue…occupational justice. J Occup Sci. 2000;7:84–86.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Gibson BE, Rappolt S. Occupational justice: a conceptual review. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:418–430.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce D, Atler K, Baltisberger J, et al. Occupational science: a data‐based American perspective. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:204–215.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson I, Townsend E. Occupational justice - bridging theory and practice. Scand J Occup Therapy. 2014;21:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakellariou D, Simó Algado S. Sexuality and disability: a case of occupational injustice. Br J Occup Therapy. 2006;69:69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fiddler A, Peerla D. The Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug and the struggle for the right to say no [Conference Paper]. J Occup Sci. 2009;16:10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard A. Justice, difference, and the capability to function. J Occup Sci. 2016;23:3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitonyak JS, Mroz TM, Fogelberg D. Expanding client-centred thinking to include social determinants: a practical scenario based on the occupation of breastfeeding. Scand J Occup Therapy. 2015;22:277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant W, Craik C, McKay EA. Living in a glasshouse: exploring occupational alienation. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:282–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Reflections on… well-being and occupational rights. Can J Occup Ther. 2008;75:61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Townsend E, Wilcock AA. Occupational justice and client-centred practice: a dialogue in progress. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:75–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teraoka M, Kyougoku M. Development of the final version of the classification and assessment of occupational dysfunction scale. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeney AB, Marshall A. Water quality, health, and human occupations. Am J Occup Therapy. 2009;63:46–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford G. Occupational deprivation: global challenge in the new millennium. Br J Occup Therapy. 2000;63:200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford GE. Understanding the occupational deprivation of refugees: a case study from Kosovo. Can J Occup Ther. 2005;72:78–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mernar TJ. Occupation, stress, and biomarkers: measuring the impact of occupational injustice. J Occup Sci. 2006;13:209–213.
   Google Scholar
• Anaby DR, Backman CL, Jarus T. Measuring occupational balance: a theoretical exploration of two approaches. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77:280–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics United States Department of Labor. Persons with a Disability: Labor Force Characteristics Summary online: Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor; 2018. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t06.htm
   Google Scholar
• Visitability. Visitability online: National Council on Independent Living, USA; 2018. Available from: https://visitability.org/about-visitability/statistics-and-demographics/
   Google Scholar
• Beart S, Hawkins D, Kroese BS, et al. Barriers to accessing leisure opportunities for people with learning disabilities. Br J Learn Disabil. 2001;29:133–138.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Law M, King S, et al. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;23:63–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaarsma E, Dijkstra P, Geertzen J, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of sports participation for people with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:871–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell DR. The future employment impacts of industrial robots: an input-output approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1985;28:297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss A, Igelsbock J, Wurhofer D, et al. Looking forward to a robotic society? Notions of future human-robot relationships. Int J Soc Robot. 2011;3:111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan J. Humans need not apply: a guide to wealth and work in the age of artificial intelligence. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ford M. Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York (NY): Basic Books; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Royakkers L, van Est R. A literature review on new robotics: automation from love to war. Int J Soc Robot. 2015;7:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Science Public Policy. Panel on technology employment. The impact of technological change on employment and economic growth. Pensacola (FL): Ballinger Publishing Company; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle D. Welcoming our robot overlords: The disruptive potential of technological progress online: Institute for Public Policy Research, UK; 2015. Available from: http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/technology-globalisation-future-of-work_Mar2015.pdf#page=104
   Google Scholar
• Smith A, Anderson J. AI, robotics, and the future of jobs online. Pew Research Center; 2014. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/06/future-of-jobs/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Public Attitudes towards Robots Online. European Commission; 2012 [cited 382]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Ghai A. Interrogating the impact of scientific and technological development on disabled children in India and beyond. Disabil Global South. 2015;2:667–685.
   Google Scholar
• Impact Lab. 50% Unemployment, Sex Robots And Leisure online. Impact Lab; 2016. Available from: http://www.impactlab.net/2016/02/16/50-unemployment-sex-robots-and-leisure/
   Google Scholar
• Acton N. Employment of disabled persons: where are we going. Int'l Lab Rev. 1981;120:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk C, Kennedy B, Podrebarac Sciupac E. Public opinion on the future use of brain implants online. Pew Research Center; 2016. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/26/public-opinion-on-the-future-use-of-brain-implants/
   Google Scholar
• Coenen C, Schuijff M, Smits M, et al. Human Enhancement Study. 2009 [cited 2009]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/publications/studies/stoa2007-13_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roduit JAR, Heilinger JC, Baumann H. Ideas of perfection and the ethics of human enhancement. Bioethics 2015;29:622–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Diep L. The discussions around precision genetic engineering: role of and impact on disabled people. Laws. 2016;5:37.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield B, Dale K. Fit for work? Redefining ‘Normal’and ‘Extreme’through human enhancement technologies. Organization. 2015;22:552–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miah A. Justifying human enhancement: The accumulation of biocultural capital: online; 2008 [cited IEET.org]. Available from: https://ieet.org/archive/2007080-BioCulturalCapital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miah A. Human enhancement in sports. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC, editors. Handbook of science and technology convergence. Chaim, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 815–831.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. The unenhanced underclass. In: Wilsdon JM, P, editor. Better humans? The politics of human enhancement. London: Demos Institute; 2006. p. 122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. Obsolescence and body technologies Obsolescencia y tecnologías del cuerpo. Dilemata Int J Appl Ethics. 2010;2:67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. 'Therapeutic', enhancement enabling, assistive devices and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: a missing lens in the enhancement regulation discourse. J Int Biotechnol Law. 2009;6:193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Martin A, Tynedal J, et al. Exploring discourse surrounding therapeutic enhancement of veterans and soldiers with injuries. Work (Reading, Mass). 2015;50:149–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolbring G. Hearing beyond the normal enabled by therapeutic devices: the role of the recipient and the hearing profession. Neuroethics. 2013;6:607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edling S, Mooney Simmie G. Democracy and emancipation in teacher education: a summative content analysis of teacher educators' democratic assignment expressed in policies for Teacher Education in Sweden and Ireland between 2000-2010. Citizenship Soc Econ Educ. 2018;17:20.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuvia A. Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Soc Indicat Res. 2001;54:139–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane K, Toy N. Identifying influential attributes in freight route/mode choice decisions: a content analysis. Transport Res E. 2000;36:41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992;13:313–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodrum E. “Mainstreaming” content analysis in social science: methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Soc Sci Res. 1984;13:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Report 2008;13:544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): SAGE Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Efi. 2004;22:63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Tucha L, Fuermaier AB, Koerts J, et al. Detection of feigned attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neural Transm. 2015;122:123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegel C, Sattler S, Göritz AS, et al. Work-related stress and cognitive enhancement among university teachers. Anxiety Stress Cop. 2016;29:100–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilieva IP, Hook CJ, Farah MJ. Prescription stimulants' effects on healthy inhibitory control, working memory, and episodic memory: a meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015;27:1069–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheldrup MR, Dwivedy P, Fisher J, et al., editors. Modulation of complex multitask performance by tDCS depends on individual differences in baseline task ability. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2016;60:42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Coveney CM, Nerlich B, Martin P. Modafinil in the media: metaphors, medicalisation and the body. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:487–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui JQ, Zhang Z, Zhao RF. Mechanical design and analysis of a tracked mobile system for patrol robot. Appl Mech Mater. 2014; 496–500:764–768.
   Google Scholar
• Baran D, Fung N, Ho S, et al., editors. Detecting and tracking humans using a man-portable robot. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tay BTC, Park T, Jung Y, et al. When stereotypes meet robots: The effect of gender stereotypes on People's acceptance of a security robot. In: Harris D, editor. Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. Understanding human cognition. EPCE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8019. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 261–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt TL, editor. Robotics, technology and employment. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on ‘Human Factors in Manufacturing’. London: IFS; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi MO, Syed RS. The impact of robotics on employment and motivation of employees in the service sector, with special reference to health care. Safety Health Work. 2014;5:198–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edler D, Ribakova T. The impact of industrial robots on the level and structure of employment in Germany - a simulation study for the period 1980–2000. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1994;45:255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier F. Package dyeing: limiting costs. Industrie Textile. 2001;1328:44–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chao GT, Kozlowski SWJ. Employee perceptions on the implementation of robotic manufacturing technology. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71:70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark JA. Technological change and employment: some results from BLS research. Monthly Labor Rev. 1987;110:26–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor DH. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J Econ Perspect. 2015;29:3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang LD, editor. Competencies requirements for robot technicians. Future Considerations. Detroit (MI): SME; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Hull DM, Lovett JE, editors. National model for training robotics/automated systems technicians. Future Considerations. Detroit (MI): SME; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi I, Metz JHM, Maltz E, et al. Designing the optimal robotic milking barn, part 1: quantifying facility usage. J Agric Eng Res. 2000;76:37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossing W, Aurik E, Smit W. Robot milking systems and the integration in the dairy farm. In: Chastain JP, editor. Fourth International Diary Housing Conference. National Mastitis Council, online; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Korinth G, Broding HC, Uter W, et al. Secondary prevention of allergic symptoms in a dairy farmer by use of a milking robot. Clin Mol Allergy. 2005;3:8–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glass K, Hall K. Occupational therapists' views about the use of robotic aids for people with disabilities. Am J Occup Therapy. 1987;41:745–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue K, Wada K, Ito Y. Effective application of paro: seal type robots for disabled people in according to ideas of occupational therapists. In: Miesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W, Karshmer A, editors. Computers helping people with special needs. ICCHP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5105. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. pp. 1321–124.
   Google Scholar
• Yu R, Woo J, Hui E, et al. Feasibility and effect of a therapeutic robot PARO on moods and social interaction in older adults with declining cognitive function. Gerontechnology. 2014;13:317.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux C, Laffont I, Biard N, et al., editors. Robot grasping of unknown objects, description and validation of the function with quadriplegic people. 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'07; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MH, Kiguchi K, Rahman MM, et al., editors. Robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and motion assist. 1st International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, ICIIS 2006; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Prior SD. An electric wheelchair mounted robotic arm-a survey of potential users. J Med Eng Technol. 1990;14:143–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams KD, Rincón AMR, Becerra Puyo LM, et al. An exploratory study of children's pretend play when using a switch-controlled assistive robot to manipulate toys. Br J Occup Therapy. 2017;80:216–224.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay S, Lam A. Exploring types of play in an adapted robotics program for children with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;13:263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernd T, Gelderblom GJ, Vanstipelen S, et al. Short term effect evaluation of IROMEC involved therapy for children with intellectual disabilities. In: Ge SS, Li H, Cabibihan JJ, Tan YK, editors. Social robotics. ICSR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6414. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. pp. 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Klein T, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L, et al., editors. Evaluation of short term effects of the IROMEC robotic toy for children with developmental disabilities. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson H. Robots have a hand in helping stroke patients. Med Device Diagnos Indus 2007;29:41–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sakurada T, Kawase T, Takano K, et al. A BMI-based occupational therapy assist suit: Asynchronous control by SSVEP. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase T, Sakurada T, Koike Y, et al. Estimating Joint Angles from Biological Signals for Multi-joint Exoskeletons. In: Proceedings of 2014 Ieee International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. New York (NY): IEEE;2014. p. 1470–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Pernalete N, Yu W, Fritz B, et al., editors. Development of a telerobotic system to assist persons with disabilities. Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pila O, Duret C, Laborne FX, et al. Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2017;14:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dewald JPA, Rymer WZ. Robotic devices for physical rehabilitation of stroke patients: fundamental requirements, target therapeutic techniques, and preliminary designs. Technol Disabil. 1996;5:205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Sucar LE, Azcárate G, Leder RS, et al. Gesture therapy: a vision-based system for arm rehabilitation after stroke. Commun Comput Inform Sci. 2008;25:531–540.
   Google Scholar
• Treger I, Faran S, Ring H. Robot-assisted therapy for neuromuscular training of sub-acute stroke patients. A feasibility study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah HA, Tarry C, Lambert C, et al. Results of clinicians using a therapeutic robotic system in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2011;8:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik NA, Yussof H, Hanapiah FA, editors. Development of imitation learning through physical therapy using a humanoid robot. Procedia Computer Science. 2014;42:191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Campodonico F. Assisted ambulation and activity for restless or passive persons with profound multiple disabilities: assessing performance and preferences. Behav Intervent. 2000;15:331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman T, Basante J, Alexander M. Robotics, assistive technology, and occupational therapy management to improve upper limb function in pediatric neuromuscular diseases. Phys Med Rehabil Clinics North Am. 2012;23:701–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Wang WE, et al. Bilateral robotic priming before task-oriented approach in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:225–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Lee DG. editors. Robot aided rehabilitation system for gait training of stroke patients. 2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence, URAI 2012; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rabadi MH, Galgano M, Lynch D, et al. A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:1071–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammann-Reiffer C, Bastiaenen CHG, Meyer-Heim AD, et al. Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy: a bicenter, pragmatic, randomized, cross-over trial (PeLoGAIT). BMC Pediatrics. 2017;17:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimoto A, Otaka Y, Kasuga S, et al. Robotic assessment of upper limb function after proximal humeral fracture: personal experience as a patient and occupational therapist. Keio j Med. 2016;65:57–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaudoin M, Routhier F, Lettre J, et al. Effects and impacts of a robotic arm used by individuals with upper limb motor impairment: a scoping review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58:e98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuyler JL, Mahoney RM. Assessing human-robotic performance for vocational placement. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng. 2000;8:394–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammel JM, Vanderloos HFM, Perkash I. Evaluation of a vocational robot with a quadriplegic employee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:683–693. PubMed PMID: WOS:A1992JD13900015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CL. Introduction: robotic and the disabled. Occup Therapy Health Care. 1986;3:1986–1987.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Report on Disability: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich RM, Callanan Y. Insights about researching discouraged workers. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Occupational rights and critical occupational therapy: rising to the challenge. Malden (MA): Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. p. 449–451.
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Therapy Australia. OT Australia position statement: occupational deprivation. Austr Occup Therapy J. 2016;63:445–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KRW, Beagan B. Occupational injustice: a critique. Can J Occup Ther. 2017;84:58–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premji S. Barriers to return-to-work for linguistic minorities in Ontario: an analysis of narratives from appeal decisions. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman DL, Dennhardt S, Fok D, et al. A vision for occupational science: reflecting on our disciplinary culture. J Occup Sci. 2008;15:136–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sadlo G. Threshold concepts for educating people about human engagement in occupation: the study of human systems that enable occupation. J Occup Sci. 2016;23:496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. Ability privilege: a needed addition to privilege studies. J Critic Anim Stud. 2014;12:118–141.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G, Yumakulov S. Education through an ability studies lens. Zeitschrift Für Inklusion. 2015; http://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/278/261
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring G. Is there an end to out-able? Is there an end to the rat race for abilities? J Media Culture. 2008;11.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH. Self esteem as an influence on occupational choice and occupational satisfaction. J Vocat Behav. 1971;1:75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer RA. The actual and retrospective-occupational self-concept dimensions of retired educators. J Vocat Behav. 1973;3:465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichar DM, Thompson JLP. Alienation, occupational self-direction, and worker consciousness. Work Occup. 1986;13:47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson-Campbell M, Shaw L, O'Brien J, et al. A scoping review on occupational and self identity after a brain injury. Work. 2013;44:57–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braude L, Brown ML. Some notes on occupational identity formation. Wisconsin Soc. 1964;3:17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Melgosa J. Development and validation of the occupational identity scale. J Adolesc. 1987;10:385–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellas M, Jernigan LP. Occupational identity status development, gender comparisons, and internal-external control in first-year Air Force Cadets. J Youth Adolesc. 1987;16:587–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeus W. Occupational identity development, school performance, and social support in adolescence. Adolescence. 1993;28:809.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groth TM, Curtis A, Mendham E, et al. The development and validation of a collective occupational identity construct (COIC) in a natural resource context. J Rural Stud. 2015;40:111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten R, Crow M, Shelley T. What's in a name? The occupational identity of conservation and natural resource oriented law enforcement agencies. Am J Crim Just. 2015;40:750–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailwood M. Broadside ballads and occupational identity in early modern England. Huntington Library Quarterly. 2016;79:187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson-Campbell M, Shaw L, O'Brien J, et al. Exploring the transformation in occupational identity: perspectives from brain injury survivors. J Occup Sci. 2016;23:208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennals P, Fortune T, Williams A, et al. Shifting occupational identity: doing, being, becoming and belonging in the academy. Higher Educ Res Dev. 2016;35:433–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richer M. How will we work tomorrow? Five strong trends in the development of work. Futuribles: Analyse et Prospective. 2018;422:19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Clark F. Reflections on the human as an occupational being: biological need, tempo and temporality. J Occup Sci. 1997;4:86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Watson RM. Being before doing: the cultural identity (essence) of occupational therapy. Aust Occ Ther J. 2006;53:151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hart N. Humans are occupational beings: basic musings of a bureaucratic being. J Occup Sci. 1994;1:54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DL. The Dr Elizabeth Casson Memorial Lecture 2017: life as an occupational being. Br J Occup Therapy. 2017;80:525–532.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Friedland J. 19th & 20th century educational reforms arising in Europe, the United Kingdom, and the Americas: inspiration for occupational science? J Occup Sci. 2016;23:488–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar