The Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ): psychometric evaluation and revision for use in neurological rehabilitation

References

• Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part two: the underlying theories. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:1145–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, et al. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1555–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, et al. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: a concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1923–1939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg J, Kreuter M, Taft C, et al. Patient participation in care and rehabilitation from the perspective of patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:834–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorarinsdottir K, Kristjansson K. Patients' perspectives on person-centred participation in healthcare: a framework analysis. Nurs Ethics. 2014;21:129–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldh AC, Ekman I, Ehnfors M. Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care. Nurs Ethics. 2006;13:503–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman ML, Beltran P, Cappelleri JC, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual issues. Value Health. 2007;10 Suppl.2:S66–S75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Silva D. Measuring patient experience. London (UK): The Health Foundation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• de Silva D. Helping measure person centred care. A review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools used to help measure person-centered care. London (UK): The Health Foundation; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg J, Kreuter M, Person L-O, et al. Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) – development and psychometric evaluation. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:838–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.
   Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis, and reporting of patient-reported outcomes; Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York; London: The Guilford Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll BJ. The nature of data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient. Psychometrika. 1961;26:347–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC and Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004;9:466–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C-H. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res. 2016;48:936–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadermann A, Guhn M, Zumbo B. Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012;17:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Cella D, Chassany O, et al. Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1244–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Calculation of effect sizes. Dettelbach, Germany: Psychometrica; 2
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips NM, Street M, Haesler E. A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr., Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:393–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray J, McNeil H, Lafortune C, et al. Measuring patients' experience of rehabilitation services across the care continuum. Part I: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:104–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almborg A-H, Ulander K, Thulin A, et al. Patients' perceptions of their participation in discharge planning after acute stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Garratt A, Løchting I, et al. Development of the rehabilitation patient experiences questionnaire: data quality, reliability and validity in patients with rheumatic diseases. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:576–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA, Teare G, McGilton KS, et al. Reliability and construct validity of the client-centred rehabilitation questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1387–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack B, Borg M, Cardiff S, et al. Person-centredness – the ‘state’ of the art. Int Pract Dev J. 2015;5.
   Google Scholar
• Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Hobart JC. The problem with health measurement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendrill L. Man as a measurement instrument. NCSLI Meas. 2014;9:24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004;13:251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg J, Kreuter M, Persson L-O, et al. Family members’ perspectives on patient participation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;2:223.
   Google Scholar