4,760
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Support persons’ views on remote communication and social media for people with communicative and cognitive disabilities*

, &
Pages 1439-1447 | Received 01 Mar 2018, Accepted 25 Sep 2018, Published online: 28 Nov 2018

References

  • Statistics Sweden. Use of computers and the internet by private persons in 2016. Stockholm (Sweden): Statistics Sweden, Short-term indicators, R&D and IT; 2016.
  • Scholz F, Yalcin B, Priestley M. Internet access for disabled people: understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology. 2017;11. DOI:10.5817/CP2017-1-4
  • Buchholz M, Ferm U, Holmgren K. “That is how I speak nowadays” – experiences of remote communication among persons with communicative and cognitive disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1468–1479.
  • Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication Processes. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.; 2013.
  • UN. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities UN; 2007.
  • WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: World Health Organization; 2001 [cited 2018 August 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en.
  • Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30:1–18.
  • Jaeger PT. Disability and the Internet. Boulder (CO): Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.; 2012.
  • Dattilo J, Gus E, Estrella LJ, et al. “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24:16–28.
  • Hamm B, Mirenda P. Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22:134–147.
  • Caron J, Light J. “Social Media has Opened a World of ‘Open communication:’” experiences of adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32:25–40.
  • Hynan A, Goldbart J, Murray J. A grounded theory of Internet and social media use by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1559–1575.
  • Raghavendra P, Newman L, Grace E, et al. Enhancing social participation in young people with communication disabilities living in rural Australia: outcomes of a home-based intervention for using social media. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1576–1590.
  • Buchholz M, Mattsson Müller I, Ferm U. Text messaging with pictures and speech synthesis for adolescents and adults with cognitive and communicative disabilities – professionals’ views about user satisfaction and participation. Technol Disabil. 2013;25:87–98.
  • Müller I, Buchholz M, Ferm U. Text messaging with picture symbols – experiences of seven persons with cognitive and communicative disabilities. J Assistive Technol. 2010;4:11–23.
  • Caron J, Light J. Social media experiences of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19:30–42.
  • Brunner M, Hemsley B, Palmer S, et al. Review of the literature on the use of social media by people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1511–1521.
  • Hemsley B, Balandin S, Palmer S, et al. A call for innovative social media research in the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33:14–22.
  • Paterson HL. The use of social media by adults with acquired conditions who use AAC: current gaps and considerations in research. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33:23–31.
  • Caron J. Engagement in social media environments for individuals with who use augmentative and alternative communication. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;39:499–506.
  • Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
  • Kitzinger J, Barbour R. Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Barbour R, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 1–20.
  • Dahlin Ivanoff S, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:125–132.
  • Dahlin Ivanoff S, Holmgren K. Fokusgrupper. Lund (Sweden): Studentlitteratur; 2017.
  • Sallafranque-St-Louis F, Normand CL. From solitude to solicitation: how people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the internet. Cyberpsychology. 2017;11. DOI:10.5817/CP2017-1-7
  • Grace E, Raghavendra P, Newman L, et al. Learning to use the Internet and online social media: what is the effectiveness of home-based intervention for youth with complex communication needs? Child Lang Teach. 2014;30:141–157.
  • Raghavendra P, Wood D, Newman L, et al. Why aren’t you on Facebook?: patterns and experiences of using the Internet among young people with physical disabilities. Technol Disabil. 2012;24:149–162.
  • Sorbring E, Molin M, Löfgren-Mårtenson L. “I’m a mother, but I’m also a facilitator in her every-day life”: parents’ voices about barriers and support for internet participation among young people with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychology. 2017;11. DOI:10.5817/CP2017-1-3
  • Seale J. The role of supporters in facilitating the use of technologies by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: a place for positive risk-taking?. Eur J Spec Needs Edu. 2014;29:220–236.
  • Seale J, Chadwick D. How does risk mediate the ability of adolescents and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live a normal life by using the Internet? Cyberpsychology. 2017;11. DOI:10.5817/CP2017-1-2