Systematic review of subjective memory measures to inform assessing memory limitations after stroke and stroke-related aphasia

References

• Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(11):877–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo S, Feigin V, Parag V, et al. Auckland stroke outcomes study: part 2: cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1608–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Nair R, Cogger H, Worthington E, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke. Cochrane Libr. 2016;(9):CD002293.
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, et al. Post‐stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(9):1288–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey L, Siegel J, Lang C, et al. Behavioural clusters and predictors of performance during recovery from stroke. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1(3):0038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang EY, Amiesimaka O, Harrison SL, et al. Longitudinal effect of stroke on cognition: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(2):e006443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turunen KE, Laari SP, Kauranen TV, et al. Domain-specific cognitive recovery after first-ever stroke: a 2-year follow-up. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24(2):117–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe G, Ricca M, Knilans J, et al. Construct validity and reliability of working memory tasks for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2014;28(6):692–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimian N, Asgari K, Neshat Doost HT, et al. Investigating patterns of memory impairment in ischemic stroke in an Iranian population. Appl Neuropsych-Adul. 2018;25(5):458–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snaphaan L, de Leeuw F-E. Poststroke memory function in nondemented patients: a systematic review on frequency and neuroimaging correlates. Stroke. 2007;38(1):198–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakling AE, Aarsland D, Naess H, et al. Cognitive deficits in chronic stroke patients: neuropsychological assessment, depression, and self-reports. Dement Geriatr Cogn. 2017;7(2):283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijajlović MD, Pavlović A, Brainin M, et al. Post-stroke dementia – a comprehensive review. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(11):1006–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davachi L, Dobbins IG. Declarative memory. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(2):112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL, Clark HM. Neurogenic disorders of language and cognition: evidence-based clinical practice. Austin (TX): Pro-Ed; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer JF, Murray LL. Measuring working memory deficits in aphasia. J Commun Disord. 2012;45(5):325–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartha L, Benke T. Acute conduction aphasia: an analysis of 20 cases. Brain Lang. 2003;85(1):93–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulsipher DT, Stricker NH, Sadek JR, et al. Clinical utility of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) after unilateral stroke. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(6):924–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawadzka E, Domańska Ł. Emotional and social characteristics of stroke patients with low verbal memory. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(10):1203–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijben‐Schoenmakers M, Rademaker A, et al. Cognition in relation to independency in older, comorbid stroke patients in a stroke unit. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32:761–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, et al. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ open. 2016;6(4):e009974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignam J, Copland D, O'Brien K, et al. Influence of cognitive ability on therapy outcomes for anomia in adults with chronic poststroke aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(2):406–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnish SM, Lundine JP. Nonverbal working memory as a predictor of anomia treatment success. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):S880–S94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleman S, Kim E. Decision-making, cognition, and aphasia: developing a foundation for future discussions and inquiry. Aphasiology. 2015;29(12):1409–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallila-Rohter S, Kiran S. Non-linguistic learning and aphasia: Evidence from a paired associate and feedback-based task. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(1):79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choppin BH. Objective tests. In: Keeves JP, editor. Educational research, methodology and measurement: an international handbook. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Elsevier; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Emerson MJ, Friedman NP. editors. Assessment of executive functions in clinical settings: problems and recommendations. In Seminars in speech and language. Copyright© 2000 by New York (NY): Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT. Functions of the frontal lobes: relation to executive functions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011;17(05):759–765.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corsi P. Memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Montreal (Canada): Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), McGill University (QB): 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler test of adult reading. San Antonio, (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dubreuil P, Adam S, Bier N, et al. The ecological validity of traditional memory evaluation in relation with controlled memory processes and routinization. Arch Clin Neuropsych. 2007;22(8):979–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Harris JE, Baddeley AD. Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. J Verb Learn Verb Be. 1983;22(3):341–357.
   Google Scholar
• Gruneberg M, Morris P, Sykes RN. The obituary on everyday memory and its practical applications is premature. Amer. Psychologist. 1991;46(1):74–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateer CA. Neuropsychological interventions for memory impairment and the role of single-case design methodologies. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(4):623–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner DM, Pachana NA. Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: a case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. Arch Clin Neuropsych. 2006;21(4):327–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA. Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment: do neuropsychological indexes predict performance in everyday activities? Appl Prev Psychol. 1993;2(4):209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Baird A, Burns C, Perry L, et al. Australian stroke survivor and carer needs assessment survey (version 4). Melbourne (Australia): Monash University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijsbergen MW, Mark RE, de Kort PL, et al. Prevalence and profile of poststroke subjective cognitive complaints. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(8):1823–1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, et al. The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Brit J Clin Psychol. 1982;21(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man DW, Fleming J, Hohaus L, et al. Development of the Brief Assessment of Prospective Memory (BAPM) for use with traumatic brain injury populations. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21(6):884–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestergren P. On the subjective–objective distinction for measures of memory and cognition: theoretical and methodological issues in questionnaire development and validation. Department of Applied Educational Science Educational Measurement Umeå University No. 7; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Murray LL. Sentence processing in aphasia: An examination of material-specific and general cognitive factors. J Neurolinguist. 2018;48:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herreen D, Zajac IT. The reliability and validity of a self-report measure of cognitive abilities in older adults: more personality than cognitive function. J Intell. 2017;6(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Pearman A, Storandt M. Self-discipline and self-consciousness predict subjective memory in older adults. J Gerontol B-Psychol. 2005;60(3):P153–P7.
   Google Scholar
• Bolla KI, Lindgren KN, Bonaccorsy C, et al. Memory complaints in older adults. Fact or fiction? Arch Neurol. 1991;48(1):61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paquet L, Verma S, Collins B, et al. Testing a novel account of the dissociation between self‐reported memory problems and memory performance in chemotherapy‐treated breast cancer survivors. Psycho‐Oncology. 2018;27(1):171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandi T. Relationship between subjective memory complaints, objective memory performance, and depression among older adults. Am J Alzheimers Dis. 2004;19:353–360.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: A practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Exposure draft for comment. Geneva (Switzerland): Who; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reid LM, MacLullich AM. Subjective memory complaints and cognitive impairment in older people. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(5–6):471–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldorff FB, Siersma V, Waldemar G. Association between subjective memory complaints and health care utilisation: a three-year follow up. BMC Geriatr. 2009;9(1):43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. Practitioner review: Do performance‐based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? J Child Psychol Psyc. 2013;54(2):131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook TH, Larrabee GJ. Normative data on a self-rating scale for evaluating memory in everyday life. Arch Clin Neuropsych. 1992;7(1):41–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinson D, Lincoln N. Subjective memory impairment after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1987;9(1):6–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• das Nair R, Cogger H, Worthington E, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke: an updated review. Stroke. 2017;48(2):e28–e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallat-Azouvi C, Pradat-Diehl P, Azouvi P. Modularity in rehabilitation of working memory: a single-case study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(2):220–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salis C, Murray L, Bakas K. An international survey of assessment practices for short-term and working memory deficits in aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pat. 2018;27(2):574–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. Core outcomes in aphasia treatment research: an e-Delphi consensus study of international aphasia researchers. Am J Speech Lang Pat. 2016;25(4S):S729–S42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkina I, Rosenberg S, Kalinyak-Fliszar M, et al. Short-term memory and aphasia: from theory to treatment. Semin Speech Lang. 2017;38(01):17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL. Direct and indirect treatment approaches for addressing short-term or working memory deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26(3–4):317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salis C, Kelly H, Code C. Assessment and treatment of short‐term and working memory impairments in stroke aphasia: a practical tutorial. Int J Lang Comm Dis. 2015;50:721–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau LT, Lee JB, Fleming J, et al. Reliability and normative data for the Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory (CAPM). Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;17(6):707–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Silver FL, et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2016;97(12):2188–2201. e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinanović O, Mrkonjić Z, Zukić S, et al. Post-stroke language disorders. Acta Clin Croat. 2011;50(1):79–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, et al. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(3):118–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan C, Fleming J, Cornwell P, et al. Prospective memory after stroke: a scoping review. Brain Impair. 2016;17(2):123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijsbergen MW, Mark RE, de Kort PL, et al. Subjective cognitive complaints after stroke: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(3):408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist A, Grundström K, Samuelsson K, et al. Computerized training of working memory in a group of patients suffering from acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 2010;24(10):1173–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doornhein K, De Haan EH. Cognitive training for memory deficits in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998;8(4):393–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL, Salis C, Martin N, et al. The use of standardised short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(3):309–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam (Netherlands): University Medical Center; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Reviews & Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, Centre for Reviews & Dissemination. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Fam Pract. 2004;21(1):4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben L, Busschbach JJ, Ponds RW, et al. Memory self-efficacy and psychosocial factors in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):681–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds RW, Jolles J. The abridged Dutch Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) Questionnaire: structure and effects of age, sex, and education. Psychol Aging. 1996;11(2):324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben L, Kessel M, Duivenvoorden H, et al. Metamemory and memory test performance in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(5):742–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben L, Ponds RW, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, et al. Memory complaints in chronic stroke patients are predicted by memory self-efficacy rather than memory capacity. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(6):566–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo S, Feigin V, Lawes C, et al. Natural history of attention deficits and their influence on functional recovery from acute stages to 6 months after stroke. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;35(4):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerboom W, Van Zandvoort MJ, van Kooten F, et al. Long-term fatigue after perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage in relation to cognitive functioning, mood and comorbidity. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(9):928–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds RW, Van Boxtel M, Jolles J. De Cognitive Failure Questionnaire als maat voor subjectief cognitief functioneren. Tijdschr Neuropsychol. 2006;2:37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee N, Andrewes D, Khan F, et al. Predicting compliance with treatment following stroke: A new model of adherence following rehabilitation. Brain Impair. 2008;9(2):122–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche NL, Fleming JM, Shum DH. Self-awareness of prospective memory failure in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2002;16(11):931–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrewes DG, Hordern C, Kaye A. The everyday functioning questionnaire: a new measure of cognitive and emotional status for neurosurgical outpatients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998;8(4):377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Cockburn JM, Wade DT, et al. A subjective memory assessment questionnaire for use with elderly people after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1995;9(3):238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Duffin JT, Collins DR, Coughlan T, et al. Subtle memory and attentional deficits revealed in an Irish stroke patient sample using domain-specific cognitive tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc. 2012;34(8):864–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer S, Trexler LE, Gauggel S. Awareness of activity limitations and prediction of performance in patients with brain injuries and orthopedic disorders. J Int Neuropsych Soc. 2004;10(2):190–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ. Cognitive dysfunction and psychological adjustment after brain injury In: Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, Roueche JR, Pepping M, Wood BC, editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986. p. 96–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Craik FI, Luo L, et al. Impairments in prospective and retrospective memory following stroke. Neurocase. 2009;15(2):145–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford JR, Smith G, Maylor EA, et al. The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory. 2003;11(3):261–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimonides S, Cavuoto MG, De Silva L, et al. The role of subjective cognitive complaints and depressive symptoms in social re-integration following stroke: a mediation explanation in a cross-sectional sample. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(7):514–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newson RS, Kemps EB. The nature of subjective cognitive complaints of older adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2006;63(2):139–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb F, Anderson J, Saling M, et al. Predictors of subjective cognitive complaint in postacute older adult stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1747–1752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldenkamp AP, Baker G, Pieters M, et al. The Neurotoxicity Scale: the validity of a patient-based scale, assessing neurotoxicity. Epilepsy Res. 1995;20(3):229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebermann D, Ostendorf F, Kopp UA, et al. Subjective cognitive-affective status following thalamic stroke. J Neurol. 2013;260(2):386–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook TH, Larrabee GJ. A self-rating scale for evaluating memory in everyday life. Psychol Aging. 1990;5(1):48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Tinson D. The relation between subjective and objective memory impairment after stroke. Brit J Clin Psychol. 1989;28(1):61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maaijwee NA, Schaapsmeerders P, Rutten-Jacobs LC, et al. Subjective cognitive failures after stroke in young adults: prevalent but not related to cognitive impairment. J Neurol. 2014;261(7):1300–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, et al. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol. 2000;47(2):145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man DW, Yip C, Lee G, et al. Self-report prospective memory problems in people with stroke. Brain Injury. 2015;29(3):329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maujean A, Davis P, Kendall E, et al. The daily living self-efficacy scale: a new measure for assessing self-efficacy in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(6):504–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson E, Wik K, Östling A-K, et al. Everyday memory self-assessed by adult patients with acquired brain damage and their significant others. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006;16(3):257–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planton M, Peiffer S, Albucher JF, et al. Puel M and others. Neuropsychological outcome after a first symptomatic ischaemic stroke with 'good recovery'. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(2):212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas Antérion C, Ribas C, Honoré-Masson S, et al. Le questionnaire de plainte cognitive (QPC): un outil de recherche de plainte suspecte d’évoquer une maladie d’Alzheimer. L'année Gérontologique. 2003;17:56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Behavioral limitations TBI patients tend to underestimate: A replication and extension to patients with lateralized cerebral dysfunction. Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;10(2):191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn AC, Bhargava D, Al-Tamimi YZ, et al. Self-perceived health status following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(4):e003932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronnberg J, Larsson C, Fogelsjoo A, et al. Memory dysfunction in mild aphasics. Scand J Psychol. 1996;37(1):46–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett‐Levy J, Powell GE. The Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SMQ). An investigation into the self‐reporting of ‘real‐life’memory skills. Brit J Soc Clin Psyc. 1980;19:177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royle J, Lincoln NB. The Everyday Memory Questionnaire-revised: development of a 13-item scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Harris JE, Gleave J. Memory failures in everyday life following severe head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc. 1984;6(2):127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilz G. Predictors of subjective impairment after stroke: Influence of depression, gender and severity of stroke. Brain Injury. 2007;21(1):39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben L, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, van Loon EM, et al. Training memory self-efficacy in the chronic stage after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehab Neural Re. 2013;27(2):110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CM, et al. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40(10):3293–3298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkdahl A, Åkerlund E, Svensson S, et al. A randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury. Brain Injury. 2013;27(13–14):1658–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinink ER, Deelman BG. Geheugenvragenlijst voor het meten van alledaagse geheugenproblemen bij patientenmet traumatisch hersenletsel. Unpublished report Nr. 8727: Department of Neuropsychology, University of Groningen; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Evans JJ, Emslie H, Wilson BA. External cueing systems in the rehabilitation of executive impairments of action. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4(4):399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogmed. Cogmed working memory training. New York (NY): Pearson; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Miller LA, Radford K. Testing the effectiveness of group-based memory rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(5):721–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter KM, Mödden C, Eling P, et al. Working memory training and semantic structuring improves remembering future events, not past events. Neurorehab Neural Re. 2015;29(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallat C, Azouvi P, Hardisson H, et al. Rehabilitation of verbal working memory after left hemisphere stroke. Brain Injury. 2005;19(13):1157–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallat-Azouvi C, Pradat-Diehl P, Azouvi P. The working memory questionnaire: a scale to assess everyday life problems related to deficits of working memory in brain injured patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(4):634–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven RM, Murre JM, Buitenweg JI, et al. The influence of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on subjective cognitive well-being after stroke: A multi-center randomized controlled trial. PloS One. 2017;12(11):e0187582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg H, Jacobaeus H, Hirvikoski T, et al. Computerized working memory training after stroke–a pilot study. Brain Injury. 2007;21(1):21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentink M, Berger M, de Kloet A, et al. The effects of an 8-week computer-based brain training programme on cognitive functioning, QoL and self-efficacy after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26(5–6):847–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merckelbach H, Muris P, Nijman H, et al. Self-reported cognitive failures and neurotic symptomatology. Pers Indiv Differ. 1996;20(6):715–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakarias L, Salis C, Wartenburger I. Transfer effects on spoken sentence comprehension and functional communication after working memory training in stroke aphasia. J Neurolinguist. 2018;48:47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Norden AG, Fick WF, de Laat KF, et al. Subjective cognitive failures and hippocampal volume in elderly with white matter lesions. Neurology. 2008;71(15):1152–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh N. Self-report of the the Young, Middle-aged, Young-old and Old-old Individuals on Prospective Memory Functioning: Griffith University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon RA, Hultsch DF, Hertzog C. The metamemory in adulthood (MIA) questionnaire. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):671–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Altman IM, O'brien KP. Behavioral limitations that traumatic-brain-injured patients tend to underestimate. Clin Neuropsychol. 1990;4(2):163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G, Del Sala S, Logie RH, et al. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory. 2000;8(5):311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven RM, Buitenweg JI, Schmand B, et al. Brain training improves recovery after stroke but waiting list improves equally: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a computer-based cognitive flexibility training. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldenkamp AP, van Meel HF, Baker GA, et al. The A-B neuropsychological assessment schedule (ABNAS): the relationship between patient-perceived drug related cognitive impairment and results of neuropsychological tests. Seizure. 2002;11(4):231–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Baker GA, Aldenkamp AP. The A-B neuropsychological assessment schedule (ABNAS): the further refinement of a patient-based scale of patient-perceived cognitive functioning. Epilepsy Res. 2001;43(3):227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RS, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, et al. Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of confabulation. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc. 1995;17(1):20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syder D, Body R, Parker M, et al. Sheffield screening test for acquired language disorders. Windsor (Canada): NFER-Nelson; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Balen HGG van, Groot-Zwaaftink AJM. Rivermead behavioural memory test. Norms for the Netherlands and Belgium. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Saan R, Deelman B. 1986;De 15-woordentest A en B (een voorlopige handleiding). Groningen (Netherlands): Afdeling Neuropsychologie, AZG.
   Google Scholar
• Gronwall D. Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measures of recovery from concussion. Percept Motor Skill. 1977;44(2):367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, et al. California verbal learning test. 2nd ed. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale – revised. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Rey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Arch Psychologie. 1941;28:286–340.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead behavioural memory test. Bury St. Edmunds (UK): Thames Valley Test Company; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Randt CT, Brown ER, Osborne DP. A memory test for longitudinal measurement of mild to moderate deficits. Clin Neuropsyc. 1980;2(4):184–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Right temporal-lobe damage: Perception of unfamiliar stimuli after damage. Arch Neurol. 1963;8(3):264–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychol. 1969;30:276–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterrieth PA. Le test de copie d'une figure complexe; contribution à l'étude de la perception et de la mémoire. Acta Psychol. 1944;30:206–356.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Elst W, Van Boxtel MP, Van Breukelen GJ, et al. Rey's verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24–81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(3):290–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt J, Welsh KA, Breitner JC, et al. Hereditary influences on cognitive functioning in older men. A study of 4000 twin pairs. Arch Neurol. 1993;50(6):599–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. A standardized memory scale for clinical use. J Psychol. 1945;19(1):87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Alwell K, et al. Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population. Neurology. 2012;79(17):1781–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults. (Clinical guideline 176). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, et al. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010;40(1):35–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices M, McDonald S, et al. The design, conduct and report of single-case research: resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):315–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):637–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl G. Engaging with people who have aphasia: a set of resources for stroke researcher. Natl Inst Health Res Clin Res Netw Stroke. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A, Victor JC, et al. The assessment for living with aphasia: reliability and construct validity. Int J Speech-Lang PA. 2014;16(1):82–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Rose T, Howe T, et al. Developing an evidence‐base for accessibility for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2007;21(1):124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. Internet Use in Aphasia. Top Lang Disord. 2017;37:6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Elman RJ. The Internet and aphasia: crossing the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2001;15(10–11):895–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker FM, Edwards DF, Mathews LK, et al. Modifying health outcome measures for people with aphasia. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(1):42–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedraza O, Mungas D. Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008;18(3):184–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar