Living with multiple sclerosis in South Africa: how is multiple sclerosis experienced in the workplace?

References

• Calabresi PA. Diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70(10):1935–1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood L. Introduction to human physiology. 3rd ed. Pretoria: Cengage Learning; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brownlee WJ, Hardy TA, Fazekas F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2017;389(10076):1336–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser SL, Goodwin DS. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, et al., editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008. p. 2611–2621.
   Google Scholar
• Reipert B. Multiple sclerosis: a short review of the disease and its differences between men and women. J Men’s Heal Gend. 2004;1(4):334–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ramagopalan SV, Sadovnick AD. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin. 2011;29(2):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald criteria”. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(6):840–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson R. Revised McDonald criteria make diagnosis simpler, faster. Neurol Today. 2011;11(8):36–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Multiple sclerosis in time and space–geographic clues to cause. J Neurovirol. 2000;6(Suppl 2):S134–S140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhigjee AI, Moodley K, Ramkissoon K. Multiple sclerosis in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: an epidemiological and clinical study. Mult Scler. 2007;13(9):1095–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen C, MacLehose A, Beaumont JG. Advanced multiple sclerosis and the psychosocial impact on families. Psychol Health. 2011;26(1):113–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halper J. The psychosocial effect of multiple sclerosis: the impact of relapses. J Neurol Sci. 2007;256(1):S34–S38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAllister WS, Boyd JR, Holland NJ, et al. The psychosocial consequences of pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;68(Issue 16, Supplement 2):S66–S69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golla H, Mammeas S, Galushko M, et al. Unmet needs of caregivers of severely affected multiple sclerosis patients: a qualitative study. Pall Supp Care. 2015;13(6):1685–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naoshy S, Ting J, Watson C, et al. Concepts important for multiple sclerosis patient caregivers: systematic literature review of qualitative studies. Neurology. 2016;86(16):P2.196.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi BA. The experience of sexuality for individuals living with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(4):571–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz A. Multiple sclerosis and sexuality. Am J Nurs. 2011;111(7):65–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayes NM, McPherson KM, Taylor D, et al. Facilitators and barriers to engagement in physical activity for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative investigation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(8):625–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius C, Joubert N. The experiences of individuals with multiple sclerosis in the Western Cape, South Africa. Heal SA Gesondheid. 2014;19(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavolin S, Leonardi M, Giovannetti AM, et al. Factors related to difficulties with employment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013;36(2):105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack TG, Szirony GM, Kushner JD, et al. Quality of life and employment in persons with multiple sclerosis. Work. 2014;49(2):281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glanz BI, Dégano IR, Rintell DJ, et al. Work productivity in relapsing multiple sclerosis: associations with disability, depression, fatigue, anxiety, cognition, and health-related quality of life. Value Heal. 2012;15(8):1029–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Nkoli MI. Affirmative action and disability in South Africa. Transformation. 2011;1(77):100.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KL, Yorkston KM, Klasner ER, et al. The cost and benefits of employment: a qualitative study of experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):201–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade M, Rumrill P, Krause JS, et al. Perceptions of quality of employment outcomes after multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. J Rehabil. 2016;82(2):31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston K, Johnson K, Klasner E, et al. Getting the work done: a qualitative study of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(8):369–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogenschutz M, Rumrill PD, Seward HE, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of employment among Americans with multiple sclerosis: results of a qualitative focus group study. J Rehabil. 2016;82(2):59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless C, Higson-Smith C, Sithole L. Fundamentals of social research methods: an African perspective. In: Bless C, Higson-Smith C, Sithole L, editors. 5th ed. Cape Town (South Africa): JUTA Books; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Krupp LB. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis definition, pathophysiology and treatment. CNS Drugs. 2003;17(4):225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG. ERIC/ECTJ annual review paper: criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Commun Technol. 1981;29(2):75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufford L, Newman P. Bracketing in qualitative. Qualitative Social Work. 2012;11(1):80–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearing RE. Bracketing in research: a typology. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(10):1429–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grytten N, Måseide P. “When I am together with them I feel more ill.” The stigma of multiple sclerosis experienced in social relationships. Chronic Illn. 2006;2(3):195–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of inter-group conflict In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of inter-group relations. Monterey (CA): Brooks/Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Butler JA, Modaff DP. Motivations to disclose chronic illness in the workplace. Qual Res Reports Commun. 2016;17(1):77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Clair JA, Beatty JE, Maclean TL. Out of sight but not out of mind: managing invisible social identities in the workplace. AMR. 2005;30(1):78–95.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York (NY): Springer; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dennison L, Yardley L, Devereux A, et al. Experiences of adjusting to early stage Multiple Sclerosis. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(3):478–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson BL. The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness. J Nursing Scholarship. 2001;33(1):21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti AM, Brambilla L, Torri Clerici V, et al. Difficulties in adjustment to multiple sclerosis: vulnerability and unpredictability of illness in the foreground. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(9):897–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar