Establishing premises for inter-professional collaborative practice in school: inclusion, difference and influence

References

• Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Guidance on quality standards for local authorities and schools as commissioners of SLT services in the UK. London: RCSLT; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rix J, Sheehy K, Fletcher- Campbell F, et al. Continuum of education provision for children with special educational needs: a review of international policies and practices (NCSE Research Report No: 13). Dublin: NCSE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The Salamanca statement and framework for action. Paris: UNESCO; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, Rodriguez LSM, et al. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(l1):116–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Amour D, Goulet L, Labadie J-F, et al. A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Martín-Rodríguez L, Beaulieu M-D, D’Amour D, et al. The determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studies. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(sup1):132–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCartney E. Barriers to collaboration: an analysis of systemic barriers to collaboration between teachers and speech and language therapists. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999;34(4):431–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney E. Joining up working: terms, types and tensions. In: Forbes J, Watson C, editors. Service integration in schools: research and policy discourses, practices and future prospects. Rotterdam: Sense publishers; 2009. p. 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone S, Harding S, Morgan L. Exploring the involvement of children and young people with speech, language and communication needs and their families in decision making-a research project. London: The Communication Trust; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay G, Strand S. Children with language impairment: prevalence, associated difficulties, and ethnic disproportionality in an English population. Front Educ. 2016;1:2.
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin JB, Smith E, Zhang X. Epidemiology of specific language impairment: prenatal and perinatal risk factors. J Commun Dis. 1997;30(4):325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, et al. Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35(2):165–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti‐Ramsden G, Durkin K, Toseeb U, et al. Education and employment outcomes of young adults with a history of developmental language disorder. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(2):237–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin K, Simkin Z, Knox E, et al. Specific language impairment and school outcomes II. Educational context, student satisfaction, and post-compulsory progress. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;44 (1):36–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botting N, Toseeb U, Pickles A, et al. Depression and anxiety change from adolescence to adulthood in individuals with and without language impairment. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0156678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher AL, Murphy C-A, Conway P, et al. Consequential differences in perspectives and practices concerning children with developmental language disorders: an integrative review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(4):529–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwell P, editor. Phonological therapy: premises, principles and procedures. Proceedings of the 19th Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics; 1983 Aug 14–18; Karger: University of Edinburgh, UK, Switzerland; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher A, Murphy C, Conway P, et al. Engaging multiple stakeholders to improve speech and language therapy services in schools: an appreciative inquiry-based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilkelly U, Kilpatrick R, Lundy L, et al. Children’s rights in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children and Young People; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy L. Children’s rights and educational policy in Europe: the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Oxford Rev Educ. 2012;38(4):393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevlin M, Rose R. Pupils as partners in education decision‐making: responding to the legislation in England and Ireland. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2008;23(4):423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique: past, present, and future prospects—introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc. 2011;78(9):1487–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger F, Wright G. Improving the Delphi process: lessons from social psychological research. Technolog Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(9):1500–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Informat Management. 2004;42(1):15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc. 2012;79(8):1525–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundy L. Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Br Educ Res J. 2007;33(6):927–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin J. A normativist account of language-based learning disability. Learning Disabil Res Pract. 2006;21(1):8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Florian L, Black-Hawkins K. Exploring inclusive pedagogy. Br Educ Res J. 2011;37(5):813–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minow M. Learning to live with the dilemma of difference: bilingual and special education. Law Contemp Probl. 1985;48(2):157–211.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich B. Addressing tensions and dilemmas in inclusive education: living with uncertainty. London: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay G, Dockrell J, Desforges M, et al. Meeting the needs of children and young people with speech, language and communication difficulties. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010;45(4):448–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwich B. Dilemmas of difference and the identification of special educational needs/disability: international perspectives. Br Educ Res J. 2009;35(3):447–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer DL, Pavelko SL, Hahs-Vaughn DL, et al. A national survey of speech-language pathologists’ engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. LSHSS. 2019;50(4):639–655.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen-Brown J, Juhl CB, Piasta SB, et al. The effects of language- and literacy-focused professional development on early educators and children: a best-evidence meta-analysis. Early Child Res Q. 2017;38:97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthouse R, Flanagan J, Wigley B. A new model of collaborative action research; theorising from inter-professional practice development. Educ Action Res. 2016; 24(4):519–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavet J, Sloper P. The participation of children and young people in decisions about UK service development. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30(6):613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn P, Shevlin M, Lodge A. Are You Listening? I’m Me! Reach. 2011;25(1):60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rose R, Shevlin M. Encouraging voices: listening to young people who have been marginalised. Support Learn. 2004;19(4):155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Rose R, Shevlin M, Winter E, et al. Project IRIS–a longitudinal study of the experiences of and outcomes for pupils with special educational needs (SEN) in Irish Schools (NCSE Research Report No: 20). Dublin: NCSE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Burris MA. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav. 1997;24(3):369–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark A. Ways of seeing: using the Mosaic approach to listen ot young children’s persepectives. In Clark A, Moss P, Kjorholt A, editors. Beyond listening: children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol: Policy Press; 2005. p. 51–70.
   Google Scholar