Promoting resilience in work rehabilitation: development of a transdiagnostic intervention

References

• Zhang W, McLeod C, Koehoorn M. The relationship between chronic conditions and absenteeism and associated costs in Canada. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(5):413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer V, Rivard M. Compensation benefits in a population-based cohort of men and women on long-term disability after musculoskeletal injuries: costs, course, predictors. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(11):772–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidel CS, Ethiraj RK, Berenji M, et al. Health care expenditures and length of disability across medical conditions. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(7):631–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck S, Verjans M, Lambreghts C, et al. Research review on rehabilitation and return to work. Spain: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2016. p. 86.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Black KM, Feuerstein M, Loisel P. Work disability models: past and present. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editor. Handbook of work disability. New York (NY): Springer; 2013. p. 71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Main CJ, Shaw WS, Mitchell J. Towards an approach to return to work interventions in musculoskeletal disorders. In: Gatchel ZISeJR, editor. Handbook of return to work. Boston (MA): Springer US; 2016. p. 439–457.
   Google Scholar
• Tjulin Å, MacEachen E. The importance of workplace social relations in the return to work process: a missing piece in the return to work puzzle? Handbook of return to work. Boston (MA): Springer; 2016. p. 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000;71(3):543–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windle G. What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2011;21(2):152–169.
   Google Scholar
• Schwager S, Rothermund K. The automatic basis of resilience. In: Kent M, Davis, MC, Reich JW, editor. The resilience handbook: approaches to stress and trauma. Routledge; 2013. p. 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Smith BW, Epstein EM, Ortiz JA, et al. The foundations of resilience: what are the critical resources for bouncing back from stress? Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 167–187.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart DE, Yuen T. A systematic review of resilience in the physically ill. Psychosomatics. 2011;52(3):199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Nam SK, Kim AR, et al. Resilience: a meta‐analytic approach. J Couns Dev. 2013;91(3):269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, König J, et al. Psychological interventions for resilience enhancement in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(2):CD012527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MC, Porteous T, Crilly MA, et al. Physical disease and resilient outcomes: a systematic review of resilience definitions and study methods. Psychosomatics. 2015;56(2):168–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbière M, Negrini A, Durand M-J, et al. Development of the return-to-work obstacles and self-efficacy scale (ROSES) and validation with workers suffering from a common mental disorder or musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):329–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullen K, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White M, Wagner S, Schultz IZ, et al. Modifiable workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence across health conditions: a stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2013;45(4):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M, et al. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):215–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara KW, Borchgrevink PC, Jacobsen HB, et al. Transdiagnostic group-based occupational rehabilitation for participants with chronic pain, chronic fatigue and common mental disorders. a feasibility study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(21):2516–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwerenz R, Becker J, Gerzymisch K, et al. Evaluation of a transdiagnostic psychodynamic online intervention to support return to work: a randomized controlled trial. PloS One. 2017;12(5):e0176513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey AG, Watkins E. Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: a transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Eib C. Sustainable return to work: a systematic review focusing on personal and social factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29:679–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo T, Wilheim L, Gonçalves R, et al. Building resilience for future adversity: a systematic review of interventions in non-clinical samples of adults. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhove AJ, Herian MN, Perez AL, et al. Can resilience be developed at work? A meta‐analytic review of resilience‐building programme effectiveness. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016;89(2):278–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson IT, Cooper CL, Sarkar M, et al. Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: a systematic review. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2015;88(3):533–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppin AL, Bora PR, Tilburt JC, et al. The efficacy of resiliency training programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. PloS One. 2014;9(10):e111420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler E, Sarre S, Tinker A, et al. Developing a novel peer support intervention to promote resilience after stroke. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(5):1590–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin EE, Lukow HR, Lichiello S. Promoting resilience following traumatic brain injury: application of an interdisciplinary, evidence‐based model for intervention. Fam Relat. 2015;64(3):347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer N, Bourdages-Perreault L, Cornelier G, et al. Ariadne’s thread: a promising new multidisciplinary tool to foster clients’ resilience throughout the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(15):1454–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent M, Rivers C, Wrenn G. Goal-Directed Resilience in Training (GRIT): a biopsychosocial model of self-regulation, executive functions, and personal growth (eudaimonia) in evocative contexts of PTSD, obesity, and chronic pain. Behav Sci. 2015;5(2):264–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park ER, Traeger L, Vranceanu A-M, et al. The development of a patient-centered program based on the relaxation response: the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP). Psychosomatics. 2013;54(2):165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CL, Chan TH, Ng SM. The Strength-focused and Meaning-oriented Approach to Resilience and Transformation (SMART) a body-mind-spirit approach to trauma management. Soc Work Health Care. 2006;43(2-3):9–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylward M. Overcoming barriers to recovery and return to work: towards behavioral and cultural change. In: Schultz IZ. G RJ, editor. Handbook of return to work: from research to practice. New York (NY): Springer; 2016. p. 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Tansey TN, Kaya C, Moser E, et al. Psychometric validation of the brief resilience scale in a sample of vocational rehabilitation consumers. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2016;59(2):108–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martz E, Livneh H. Psychosocial adaptation to disability within the context of positive psychology: findings from the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(1):4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steensma H, Heijer MD, Stallen V. Research note: effects of resilience training on the reduction of stress and depression among Dutch workers. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2007;27(2):145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. A framework for design. In: JW C, editor. Research designs: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oak (CA): SAGE Publications; 2009. p. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33(7):14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Med Res Council. 2008;337:a1655.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais M, Pépin G, Carrière M. Triage ou comment adapter une technique de recherche à l’intervention clinique en ergothérapie (TRIAGE or how to adapt a research technique to clinical interventions in occupational therapy). Revue Québécoise D’Ergothérapie. 2000;9:11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais M, Pépin G. TRIAGE: a new group technique gaining recognition in evaluation. Eval J Aust. 2002;2(2):45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Albert V, Durand M-J, Pepin G. TRIAGE: une technique structurée sollicitant l’opinion d’experts en vue d’atteindre un consensus. In: Corbière M, Larivière N, editors. Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes appliquées au domaine de la santé mentale et à d’autres domaines connexes. Québec (Canada): Les Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2014. p. 305–326.
   Google Scholar
• Lamontagne ME, Tétreault S. Méthode TRIAGE (TRIAGE method). In: Guillez P, Tétreault S, editors. Guide pratique de recherche en réadaptation (Practical research guide in rehabilitation). Paris: De Boeck Superieur; 2014. p. 355–366.
   Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin M-F, Gagnon J. Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche: méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives (Foundations and stages of the research process). 3rd ed. Montréal (Canada): Chenelière éducation; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Durand M-J, Vachon B, Loisel P, et al. Constructing the program impact theory for an evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work. 2003;21(3):233–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rivard M, Denis J-L, Contandriopoulos A-P, et al. Evaluation of the Implementation and Impact of the PRÉVICAP Program. Institut de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong PT. Meaning therapy: an integrative and positive existential psychotherapy. J Contemp Psychother. 2010;40(2):85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez SJ, Floyd RK, Ulven JC, et al. Hope therapy: helping clients build a house of hope. In: Snyder CR, editor. Handbook of hope: theory, measures, and applications. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2000. p. 123–150.
   Google Scholar
• Fava GA, Tomba E. Increasing psychological well‐being and resilience by psychotherapeutic methods. J Pers. 2009;77(6):1903–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arends RY. Living a good life with arthritis: managing personal goals to improve psychological health. Netherlands: Universiteit Twente; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne F, Brousselle A, Hartz Z, et al. Modéliser les interventions. [Modeling interventions]. In: Brousselle A, et al. editor. L’évaluation: concepts et méthodes. Montreal (Canada): Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal; 2011. p. 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Coutu M-F, Légaré F, Durand M-J, et al. Operationalizing a shared decision making model for work rehabilitation programs: a consensus process. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassé MJ, Sabourin G, Garcin N, et al. Définition d’un trouble grave du comportement chez les personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle (Definition of a severe behavioural disorder in people with intellectual disabilities). Can J Behav Sci. 2010;42(1):62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BF MW, editor. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1992. p. 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coutu M-F, Légaré F, Durand M-J, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a shared decision-making model in work rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study of stakeholders’ perspectives. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(1):128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard J, Durand M-J, Coutu M-F. Adaptation of a guide to equip employers to manage the gradual return to work of individuals with a musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(3):625–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Muhr T. ATLAS/ti—a prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qual Sociol. 1991;14(4):349–371.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg AR, Yi-Frazier JP, Eaton L, et al. Promoting resilience in stress management: a pilot study of a novel resilience-promoting intervention for adolescents and young adults with serious illness. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40(9):992–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong PT, Wong LC. A meaning-centered approach to building youth resilience. In: Wong PT, editor. The human quest for meaning: theories, research, and applications. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2012. p. 585–617.
   Google Scholar
• Laisné F, Lecomte C, Corbière M. Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature (corrected and republished). Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1912–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoving J, Van der Meer M, Volkova A, et al. Illness perceptions and work participation: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010;83(6):595–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutu M-F, Baril R, Durand M-J, et al. Transforming the meaning of pain: an important step for the return to work. Work. 2010;35(2):209–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brouwer S, Krol B, Reneman MF, et al. Behavioral determinants as predictors of return to work after long-term sickness absence: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(2):166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydström I, Englund LD, Dellve L, et al. Importance of social capital at the workplace for return to work among women with a history of long-term sick leave: a cohort study. BMC Nurs. 2017;16(1):38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner S, White M, Schultz I, et al. Social support and supervisory quality interventions in the workplace: a stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews on work outcomes. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2015;6(4):189–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlund S, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nordin M, et al. Personal resources and support when regaining the ability to work: an interview study with exhaustion disorder patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Muller S, et al. The influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86(2):119–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbière M, Bergeron G, Negrini A, et al. Employee perceptions about factors influencing their return to work after a sick-leave due to depression. J Rehabil. 2018;84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar M. Social ecologies and their contribution to resilience. The social ecology of resilience. New-York (NY): Springer; 2012. p. 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron J, Sadlo G, Hart A, et al. Return-to-work support for employees with mental health problems: identifying and responding to key challenges of sick leave. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79(5):275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen S, Mäkikangas A, Hätinen M, et al. My well-being in my own hands: experiences of beneficial recovery during burnout rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):733–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman F, Griffiths F, Kokanovic R, et al. Resilience as a response to the stigma of depression: a mixed methods analysis. J Affect Disord. 2011;135(1–3):267–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, et al. Return‐to‐work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(3):CD011618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalder E, Hartman L, Hunt A, et al. Traumatic brain injury resiliency model: a conceptual model to guide rehabilitation research and practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(22):2708–2717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes S, Fikretoglu D. Building resilience: the conceptual basis and research evidence for resilience training programs. Rev Gen Psychol. 2018;22(4):452–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby JM, McKinnon A, Kuyken W, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic psychological treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in adulthood. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;40:91–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassington L, Ferreira NB, Yates S, et al. Better living with illness: a transdiagnostic acceptance and commitment therapy group intervention for chronic physical illness. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2016;5(4):208–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer-Zavala S, Gutner CA, Farchione TJ, et al. Current definitions of “transdiagnostic” in treatment development: a search for consensus. Behav Ther. 2017;48(1):128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liossis PL, Shochet IM, Millear PM, et al. The Promoting Adult Resilience (PAR) program: the effectiveness of the second, shorter pilot of a workplace prevention program. Behav Change. 2009;26(2):97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhardt M, Dolbier C. Evaluation of a resilience intervention to enhance coping strategies and protective factors and decrease symptomatology. J Am Coll Health. 2008;56(4):445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon AM, Hanna A, Pidgeon LW, et al. Preliminary outcomes of feasibility and efficacy of brief resilience stress training: a pilot study of the MARST program. JSS. 2015;11:211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Burton NW, Pakenham KI, Brown WJ. Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: a pilot study of the READY program. Psychol Health Med. 2010;15:266–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakenham KI, Mawdsley M, Brown FL, et al. Pilot evaluation of a resilience training program for people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63(1):29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmner EP, Stålnacke B-M, Enthoven P, et al. The acceptance” of living with chronic pain–an ongoing process: a qualitative study of patient experiences of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(1):73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gismervik SØ, Fimland MS, Fors EA, et al. The acceptance and commitment therapy model in occupational rehabilitation of musculoskeletal and common mental disorders: a qualitative focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;41(26):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rise MB, Gismervik SØ, Johnsen R, et al. Sick-listed persons’ experiences with taking part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a qualitative focus group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (ARMA) AaMA. Musculoskeletal and mental health. Policy position paper; 2018. Available from: http://arma.uk.net/msk-and-mental-health-policy-position-paper/
   Google Scholar
• Wallstedt‐Paulsson E, Erlandsson LK, Eklund M. Client experiences in work rehabilitation in Sweden: a one‐year follow‐up study. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14:28–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michallet B, Falardeau M-C, Chouinard J. L’induction pour mieux comprendre le processus de réadaptation chez des individus ayant subi un traumatisme (Induction to better understand the rehabilitation process in trauma survivors). Hors-thème. 2017;4(1):199–227.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychol Psychother. 1979;16:252.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand M-J, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention. Dis Manag Health Out. 2001;9(7):351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HT. Practical program evaluation: assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Inc.; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE. Other issues and trends in evaluation. Vol. 2. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2004. (Handbook of practical program evaluation).
   Google Scholar
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar