What does real-world walking mean to people with stroke? An interpretive descriptive study

References

• Towfighi A, Markovic D, Ovbiagele B. Impact of a healthy lifestyle on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after stroke in the USA. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(2):146–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2532–2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S, et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(3):CD003316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cumming TB, Tyedin K, Churilov L, et al. The effect of physical activity on cognitive function after stroke: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(4):557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu-Ambrose T, Eng JJ. Exercise training and recreational activities to promote executive functions in chronic stroke: a proof-of-concept study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(1):130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzolini S, Oh P, McIlroy W, et al. The effects of an aerobic and resistance exercise training program on cognition following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(5):392–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior PL, Suskin N. Exercise for stroke prevention. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018;3(2):59–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt W, Endres M, Dimeo F, et al. Train the vessel, gain the brain: physical activity and vessel function and the impact on stroke prevention and outcome in cerebrovascular disease. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(4):303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English C, Manns PJ, Tucak C, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in people with stroke living in the community: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer-Goossensen D, Genugten L. v, Lingsma H, et al. Determinants of intention to change health-related behavior and actual change in patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(4):644–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsom JT, Huguet N, McCarthy MJ, et al. Health behavior change following chronic illness in middle and later life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012;67(3):279–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarts H, Paulussen T, Schaalma H. Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours. Health Educ Res. 1997;12(3):363–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Dean CM, et al. Predictors of adherence to a structured exercise program and physical activity participation in community dwellers after stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:136525–136528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to Health. Sports Med. 1997;23(5):306–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor-Locke C. Walk more (frequently, farther, faster): The perfect preventive medicine. Prev Med. 2012;55(6):540–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord S, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, et al. Community ambulation after stroke: How important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Tawashy AE. Exercise perceptions among people with stroke: barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2011;18(9):520–530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holsbeeke L, Ketelaar M, Schoemaker MM, et al. Capacity, capability, and performance: different constructs or three of a kind? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(5):849–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan R, McBurney H. Community ambulation: environmental impacts and assessment inadequacies. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1411–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stretton CM, Mudge S, Kayes NM, et al. Can we improve real world walking after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:e10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barclay R, Stevenson TJ, Poluha W, et al. Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke. The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD010200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ada L, Dean CM, Lindley R. Randomized trial of treadmill training to improve walking in community-dwelling people after stroke: the AMBULATE trial. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(6):436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudge S, Barber PA, Stott NS. Circuit-based rehabilitation improves gait endurance but not usual walking activity in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(12):1989–1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang MYC, Eng JJ, Dawson AS, et al. A community-based fitness and mobility exercise program for older adults with chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(10):1667–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudge S. Walking performance following stroke: measurement and training [PhD]. Auckland (NZ): Univeristy of Auckland; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Stretton CM, Mudge S, Kayes NM, et al. Interventions to improve real-world walking after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(3):310–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Taylor and Francis; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 4. New Brunswick: Aldine. (Original work published 1967); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls DA. Qualitative research: Part one – Philosophies. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2009;16(10):526–533.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls DA. Qualitative research: Part two – Methodologies. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2009;16(11):586–592.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlke RM. Generic qualitative approaches: pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13(1):37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MR. Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian Work. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(9):1284–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S. The science and art of theoretical location. Evid Based Nurs. 2014;17(2):31–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Stretton CM, Mudge S, et al. Does clinic-measured gait speed differ from gait speed measured in the community in people with stroke? Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(5):438–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research. London (UK): Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA, Miller BA. Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In: Leavy P, Hesse-Biber S, editors. Handb. Emergent Methods. New York: Guildford Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. California: Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being. 2009;1(2):137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne J, Lincoln NB, Preston J, et al. What does confidence mean to people who have had a stroke? – A qualitative interview study. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(11):1125–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubina L-A, Dubouloz C-J, Davis CG, et al. The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett ML, Pickles K. Part I: frequency of depression after stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(8):1017–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann T, de Ridder D, Fujita K. Self-regulation of health behavior: social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. Health Psychol. 2013;32(5):487–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzlicht M, Legault L, Teper R. Exploring the mechanisms of self-control improvement. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014;23(4):302–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982;92(1):111–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Taylor WJ. Toward a cognitive-affective model of goal-setting in rehabilitation: is self-regulation theory a key step? Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(20):1175–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Self-body split: issues of identity in physical recovery following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(16):725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DJ. Automaticity of walking: functional significance, mechanisms, measurement and rehabilitation strategies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008;23(3):329–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord S, Rochester L. Walking in the real world: concepts related to functional gait. N Z J Physiother. 2007;35:126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Patla AE, Shumway-Cook A. Dimensions of mobility: defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. J Aging Phys Act. 1999;7(1):7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Magasi SR, Carlozzi NE, et al. Health and functional literacy in physical rehabilitation patients. Health Lit Res Pract. 2017;1(2):e71–e85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid AA, Rittman M. Fear of falling: an emerging issue after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(5):46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson ÅG, Kamwendo K, Appelros P. Fear of falling in stroke patients: relationship with previous falls and functional characteristics. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31(3):261–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, et al. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;20(5):172.
   Google Scholar
• Kayes N, Mudge S, Bright FAS, et al. Whose behavior matters? Rethinking practitioner behavior and its influence on rehabilitation outcomes. In: McPherson KM, Gibson BE, Leplege A, editors. Rethink Rehabilitation. Broca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar