Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program – a focus group study

References

• Harker J, Reid KJ, Bekkering GE, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in denmark and sweden. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:371248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid KJ, Harker J, Bala MM, et al. Epidemiology of chronic non-cancer pain in Europe: narrative review of prevalence, pain treatments and pain impact. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(2):449–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadley RM, Armstrong N, Lee YC, et al. Chronic diseases in the European Union: the prevalence and health cost implications of chronic pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012;26(4):310–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson E, Lexell J, Rivano-Fischer M, et al. Everyday occupational problems perceived by participants in a pain rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(4):306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidwall U. Sick leave diagnoses and return to work: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(5):396–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers: a synthesis of findings across OECD Countries. Canada: OECD; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Scaratti C, Leonardi M, Silvaggi F, et al. Mapping European welfare models: state of the art of strategies for professional integration and reintegration of persons with chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialdepartementet. Socialförsäkringsbalken 2010:110. In: Socialdepartementet, editor. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sabariego C, Coenen M, Ito E, et al. Effectiveness of integration and re-integration into work strategies for persons with chronic conditions: a systematic review of European strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, d Vet HC, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:Cd006955.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• En kvalitetssäker och effektiv sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocess. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergstrom G, et al. Returning to work – a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, et al. What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries HJ, Brouwer S, Groothoff JW, et al. Staying at work with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study of workers’ experiences. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen K, Lillefjell M. Factors promoting a successful return to work: from an employer and employee perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(1):48–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axén G. Mer trygghet och bättre försäkring – Parlamentariska socialförsäkringsutredningen SOU 2015:21; 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 10]. Available from: www.regeringen.se
   Google Scholar
• World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg V, Sanne H, Sjolund BH. Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation: purpose, design, implementation and characteristics of referred patients. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(1):50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research [Elektronisk resurs]. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Open Code 4.03 Software program. Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallstam A, Stalnacke BM, Svensen C, et al. “Change is possible”: patients’ experience of a multimodal chronic pain rehabilitation programme”. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(3):242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund E, Anderzen I, Andersen A, et al. Multidisciplinary intervention and acceptance and commitment therapy for return-to-work and increased employability among patients with mental illness and/or chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendbekken R, Eriksen HR, Grasdal A, et al. Return to work in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: multidisciplinary intervention versus brief intervention: a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivano-Fischer M, Persson E, Stålnacke B, et al. Return to work after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: one- and two-year follow-up based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(4):281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechtner S, Bethge M. Effects of rehabilitation aftercare on work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(1):74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Corbiere M, Coutu MF, et al. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, et al. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seing I, Stahl C, Nordenfelt L, et al. Policy and practice of work ability: a negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):553–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussener U, Stahl C, Soderberg E. Does the quality of encounters affect return to work? Lay people describe their experiences of meeting various professionals during their rehabilitation process. Work (Reading, Mass). 2015;52(2):447–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, et al. Interactions between injured workers and insurers in workers' compensation systems: a systematic review of qualitative research literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):160–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl C, Mussener U, Svensson T. Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: experiences of four actors. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1404–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar