6,629
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Impacts of goal setting on engagement and rehabilitation outcomes following acquired brain injury: a systematic review of reviews

, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2581-2590 | Received 29 Feb 2020, Accepted 02 Nov 2020, Published online: 19 Nov 2020

References

  • Järvikoski A, Härkäpää K. Kuntoutuksen perusteet [principles of rehabilitation]. 5th ed. Helsinki: WSOYpro; 2011.
  • Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–654.
  • Medley AR, Powell T. Motivational interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement in rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a conceptual review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20(4):481–508.
  • Van den Broek MD. Why does neurorehabilitation fail? J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20(5):464–473.
  • Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay‐Smith EJC, et al. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD009727.
  • Sumsion T. A revised occupational therapy definition of client-centred practice. Br J Occup Ther. 2000;63(7):304–309.
  • Ylvisaker M, Mcpherson K, Kayes N, et al. Metaphoric identity mapping: facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(5–6):713–741.
  • Parsons J, Plant S, Slark J, et al. How active are patients in setting goals during rehabilitation after stroke? A qualitative study of clinician perceptions. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(3):309–316.
  • Plant SE, Tyson SF, Kirk S, et al. What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(9):921–930.
  • Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, et al. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):177–190.
  • Levack WMM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, et al. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(9):739–755.
  • Rosewilliam S, Roskell C, Pandyan A. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(6):501–514.
  • Wheeler S, Acord-Vira A, Davis D. Effectiveness of interventions to improve occupational performance for people with psychosocial, behavioral, and emotional impairments after brain injury: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(3):7003180060p1–7003180060p9.
  • Fink A. Conducting research literature reviews: from the internet to paper. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2010.
  • Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, et al. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):1–6.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
  • Davies KS. Formulating the evidence based practice question: a review of the frameworks. Evid Based Library Inform Pract. 2011;6(2):75–80.
  • Kersten P, McCambridge A, Kayes NM, et al. Bridging the gap between goal intentions and actions: a systematic review in patient populations. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):563–570.
  • Baker C, Worrall L, Rose M, et al. A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;19:1–23.
  • Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(9):756–772.
  • Kennedy MR, Coelho C, Turkstra L, et al. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(3):257–299.
  • Krasny-Pacini A, Chevignard M, Evans J. Goal management training for rehabilitation of executive functions: a systematic review of effectiveness in patients with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(2):105–116.
  • Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, et al. Self-management support interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic meta-review. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131448.
  • Powell JM, Rich TJ, Wise EK. Effectiveness of occupation- and activity-based interventions to improve everyday activities and social participation for people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(3):7003180040p1.
  • Warner G, Packer T, Villeneuve M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2141–2163.
  • Yang SY, Lin CY, Lee YC, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(3):548–555.
  • Cullen N, Chundamala J, Bayley M, et al. The efficacy of acquired brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 2007;21(2):113–132.
  • CASP UK. CASP Critical Appraisal Skills Programme [Internet]. CASP UK; 2018; [cited 2018 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/
  • Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine – Levels of Evidence; 2009; [Internet]; [cited 2018 Feb 10]. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/blog/2009/06/11/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/
  • Bright F, Kayes N, Cummins C, et al. Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(10):1396–1405.
  • World Health Organization. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. Sixty-ninth world health assembly A69/39: WHO; 2016; [cited 2018 Apr 26]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_39-en.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
  • Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol. 2002;57(9):705–717.
  • Green D, Payne S. Understanding organisational ability and self-regulation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2018;5(1):34–42.
  • Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(6):640–649.
  • World Health Organisation (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: ICF; 2001.
  • Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61(3):328–334.
  • Green D. Limitations of meta-analyses. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(8):1774–1775.
  • The GRADE Working Group. What is GRADE? [Internet]. The GRADE Working Group; 2018; [cited 2018 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/
  • Spinal Cord.com. Acquired brain injuries. Spinal Cord, Inc.; [cited 2018 Apr 17]. Available from: https://www.spinalcord.com/acquired-brain-injury
  • Law M, King G, Russell D, et al. The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 1996;63:9–23.