Validation of teleaudiology hearing aid rehabilitation services for adults: a systematic review of outcome measurement tools

References

• Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Global health workforce shortage to reach 12.9 million in coming decades. 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/health-workforce-shortage/en/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Global estimates on prevalence of hearing loss. 2018. Available from: www.who.int/pbd/deafness/estimates/en/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss. 2018. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260336/9789241550260-eng.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Davis A, McMahon CM, Pichora-Fuller KM, et al. Aging and hearing health: the life-course approach. GERONT. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S256–S267.
   Google Scholar
• Hearing loss: an important global health concern. The Lancet. 2016;387(10036):2351–2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windmill IM, Freeman BA. Demand for audiology services: 30-yr projections and impact on academic programs. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(5):407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon JA, Wang H, Freeman MK, et al. Healthy life expectancy for 187 countries, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2144–2162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Multi-country assessment of national capacity to provide hearing care. 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/pbd/publications/WHOReportHearingCare_Englishweb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swanepoel DW. Tele-audiology: providing remote hearing health care. Audiology Today; 2020. p. 38–45. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=jlh&AN=2010586972&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Swanepoel DW, Hall JW. Making audiology work during COVID-19 and beyond. Hear J. 2020;73(6):20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Coco L. Teleaudiology: strategies considerations during a crisis and beyond. Hear J. 2020;73(5):26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tao KFM, Brennan-Jones CG, Capobianco-Fava DM, et al. Teleaudiology services for rehabilitation with hearing aids in adults: a systematic review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(7):1831–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari DV, Lopez EA. A review of hearing aid teleconsultation in Brazil. J Hear Sci. 2017;7(2):9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bush ML, Thompson R, Irungu C, et al. The role of telemedicine in auditory rehabilitation: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(10):1466–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel DW, Hall JW. A systematic review of telehealth applications in audiology. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(2):181–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker F, MacKenzie E, Elliott L, et al. Outcome measurement in adult auditory rehabilitation: a scoping review of measures used in randomized controlled trials. Ear Hear. 2015;36(5):567–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg S, Dahlström J, Möller C, et al. The ICF core sets for hearing loss-researcher perspective. Part I: systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(2):65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan-Jones CG, Bennett RJ, Barker F. Cochrane corner: interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(9):618–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett RJ, Taljaard DS, Brennan-Jones CG, et al. Evaluating hearing aid handling skills: a systematic and descriptive review. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(11):765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK^® Guide). 4th ed. Newton Square (PA): Project Management Institute, Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy P, Schau N. Adult audiologic rehabilitation: a review of contemporary practices. CICSD. 2008;35(Fall):168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, So M. Incentives and obstacles to the routine use by clinicians of outcomes measures. Ear Hear. 2001;21(4):2–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaens H, Van Royen P, Pavlic DR, et al. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, et al. Patient-centred care: a review for rehabilitative audiologists. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(sup1):S60–S67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Miles J, Weinman J. Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):197–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, et al. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):600–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):796–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(sup1):90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Coster WJ. Making the best match: selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(2):162–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metselaar M, Maat B, Verschuure H, et al. Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(1):21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundell SD, Goode AP, Friedly JL, et al. Role of health services research in producing high-value rehabilitation care. Phys Ther. 2015;95(12):1703–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, Wong L. Evidence-based practice in audiology: rehabilitation options for adults with hearing impairment. Am J Audiol. 2013;22(2):329–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM. Evidence-based practice in audiology. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(7):408–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Hearing aids for adults (practice portal). n.d. Available from: http://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Hearing-Aids-For-Adults/
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (AAA). Tele-audiology Toolkit. 2018. Available from: https://www.audiology.org/practice_management/resources/tele-audiology-toolkit
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology. Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. 2006. Available from: http://www.audiology.org/publications-resources/document-library/adult-rehabilitation-hearing-aids
   Google Scholar
• Audiology Society of Australia (ASA). Position paper: WHO are we hear for? Models of service delivery. 2014. Available from: https://audiology.asn.au/Tenant/C0000013/Position%20Papers/Models%20of%20Service%20Delivery%20Position%20Paper%2021%20July%202014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Practice guidance: Common principles of rehabilitation for adults with hearing-and/or balance-related problems in routine audiology services. 2012. Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BSA_PPC_Rehab_Final_30August2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health. 2001. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9241545429.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B, Cieza A, Gimigliano F, et al. International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: a discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(4):256–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde ML. Reasonable psychometric standards for self-report outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear. 2000;21(4 Suppl):24S–36S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paglialonga A, Cleveland NA, Ingo E, et al. eHealth and the hearing aid adult patient journey: a state-of-the-art review. BioMed Eng Online. 2018;17(1):101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reginato TTP, Ferrari DV. Teleaudiology: professional-patient communication in hearing aid programming and fitting via teleconsultation. Audiol Commun Res. 2014;19(3):299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Steine S, Finset A, Laerum E. A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients' experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract. 2001;18(4):410–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16(2):176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demorest ME, Wark DJ, Erdman SA. Development of the screening test for hearing problems. Am J Audiol. 2011;20(2):100–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear. 2000;21(4 Suppl):106S–115S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West RL, Smith SL. Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(12):759–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox MR, Alexander CG. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: The SADL Scale. Ear Hear. 1999;20(4):306–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear. 2001;22(2):151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cienkowski KM, McHugh MS, McHugo GJ, et al. A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(7):393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(1):30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14(8):403–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H, Birtles G, Lovegrove R. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: normative data for the client oriented scale and the hearing aid user's questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(2):67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8(1):27–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H, Koritschoner E, Battaglia J, et al. Rehabilitation effectiveness II: assessing the outcomes for clients of a national hearing rehabilitation program. Aust J Audiol. 1991;13(2):68–82.
   Google Scholar
• Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1988;9(2):81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein BE, Spitze JB, Ventry IM. Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly. Ear Hear. 1986;7(5):295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982;3(3):128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Hug GA, et al. Practical method for quantifying hearing aid benefit in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 1991;2(2):70–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ventry I, Weinstein B. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. Asha. 1983;25(7):37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Hearing handicap inventory for adults. Ear Hear. 1991;12(5):355–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, et al. The hearing handicap inventory for adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear. 1990;11(6):430–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing aids correctly? Am J Audiol. 2009;18(1):69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty KA, Desjardins JL. The practical hearing aids skills test-revised. Am J Audiol. 2012;21(1):100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders GH, Morse-Fortier C, McDermott DJ, et al. Description, normative data, and utility of the hearing aid skills and knowledge test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018;29(3):233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh B, McDowell JA, Collins M, et al. Development and validation of the effectiveness of auditory rehabilitation scale. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(10):851–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H. Shortened hearing aid performance inventory for the elderly (SHAPIE): a statistical approach. Aust J Audiol. 1994;16(1):37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(2):80–103.
   Google Scholar
• Tao KFM, Swanepoel DW, Brennan-Jones , et al. Teleaudiology hearing aid follow-up consultations for adults: single-blinded crossover randomized control trial and cohort studies. Int J Audiol. 2020. DOI:10.1080/14992027.2020.1805804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer C, Hickson L, Khan A, et al. What is important for hearing aid satisfaction? Application of the expectancy-disconfirmation model. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(7):644–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upfold L, May A, Battaglia J. Hearing aid manipulation skills in an elderly population: a comparison of ITE, BTE, and ITC aids. Br J Audiol. 1990;24(5):311–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett RJ, Meyer C, Olaithe M, et al. Are hearing aid owners able to identify and self-report handling difficulties? A pilot study. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(11):887–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Patterson PG. The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional services. J Serv Market. 1999;13(2):151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Esser PE, Goossens RH. A framework for the design of user-centred teleconsulting systems. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(1):32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden TC, Walden BE. Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15(5):342–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danermark B, Granberg S, Kramer SE, et al. The creation of a comprehensive and a brief core set for hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Am J Audiol. 2013;22(2):323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg S, Swanepoel DW, Englund U, et al. The ICF core sets for hearing loss project: international expert survey on functioning and disability of adults with hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Int J Audiol. 2014;53(8):497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg S, Moller K, Skagerstrand A, et al. The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Int J Audiol. 2014;53(2):77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess FH. The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear. 2000;21(4 Suppl):74S–79S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao KFM. Teleaudiology hearing aid consultations for adults: towards innovating the service-delivery in clinical practice [PhD Thesis]. The University of Western Australia Research Repository; 2020. DOI:10.26182/5ed087eb4bb7e
   Google Scholar