Prevalence, types, and combinations of multiple problems among recipients of work disability benefits

References

• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers: a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dean H. Re-conceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs. J Soc Pol. 2003;32(3):441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JP. Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: stylized facts and evidence on their effectiveness. IZA J Labor Policy 4. 2015. DOI:10.1186/s40173-015-0032-y
   Google Scholar
• Singley SG. Barriers to employment among long-term beneficiaries: a review of recent international evidence. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. Werklozen; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-arbeidsmarkt/werklozen
   Google Scholar
• Audhoe SS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Hoving JL, et al. Perspectives of unemployed workers with mental health problems: barriers to and solutions for return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthoud R. Multiple disadvantage in employment: a quantitative analysis. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselaar H, Maurits E, Molenaar-Cox P, et al. Clients with multiple problems. An orientation and report in relation to (labour)participation (Multiproblematiek bij cliënten. Verslag van een verkenning in relatie tot (arbeids)participatie (in Dutch). Meccano kennis voor beleid en AStri Beleidsonderzoek en-advies; Utrecht/Leiden: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Access to employment for vulnerable groups. Foundation paper no. 2; Dublin; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dean H, MacNeill V, Melrose M. Ready to work? Understanding the experiences of people with multiple problems and needs. Benefits. 2003;11(1):19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenberg E. On the way to work: welfare participants and barriers to employment. Econ Dev Quart. 2002;16(4):314–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins D, Nelms L. Assisting the most disadvantaged job seekers. In: Carlson E, editor. A future that works: Economic, Employment and the evironment. Newcastle: Center of Full Employment and Equity, University of Newcastle; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay SJD. Discrimination and other barriers to employment for teens and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1340–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brongers KA, Cornelius B, van der Klink JJL, et al. Development and evaluation of a strength-based method to promote employment of work-disability benefit recipients with multiple problems: a feasibility study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth P, editor. The challenge of greater economic and social participation: describing the disadvantage of lone mothers receiving income support. Steps Forward for Families: Research, Practice and Policy: 8th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference. Citeseer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth P. The prevalence of mental disorders among income support recipients: an important issue for welfare reform. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27(4):441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization: International Classification of Diseases; 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
   Google Scholar
• Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(1):125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight L, Hester M. Domestic violence and mental health in older adults. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(5):464–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd S. The effects of domestic violence on women’s employment. Law Policy. 1997;19(2):139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Scharn M, Oude Hengel K, Boot CRL, et al. Influence of chronic diseases on societal participation in paid work, volunteering and informal caregiving in Europe: a 12-year follow-up study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(2):136–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laaksonen M, Gould R. Return to work after temporary disability pension in Finland. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):471–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidrich SM, Denney N. Does social problem solving differ from other types of problem solving during the adult years? Exp Aging Res. 1994;20(2):105–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robroek SJ, Rongen A, Arts CH, et al. Educational inequalities in exit from paid employment among Dutch workers: the influence of health, lifestyle and work. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Breij S, Qvist JY, Holman D, et al. Educational inequalities in health after work exit: the role of work characteristics. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson KA, Richardson VE, Fields NL, et al. Inclusion or exclusion? Exploring barriers to employment for low-income older adults. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2013;56(4):318–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bickenbach J, Posarac A, Cieza A, et al. Assessing disability in working age population. In: A Paradigm Shift: from impairment and Functional Limitation to the Disability Approach. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers JH, Abma FI, Ståhl C, et al. Work capacity assessments and efforts to achieve a job match for claimants in a social security setting: an international inventory. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. New ways of addressing partial work capacity. Thematic review on sickness, disability and work issues paper and progress. OECD report; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Transforming disability into ability: policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hecke A, Heinen M, Fernández-Ortega P, et al. Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self-management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio-economic status. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(4):775–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazier RH, Bajcar J, Kennie NR, et al. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(7):1675–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman R, Begg S, Spelten E. What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2010;3:61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenhalgh TJB. Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ. 2009;338:b49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Rogers A. Extinguishing the social? State sponsored self-care policy and the chronic disease self-management programme. Disabil Soc. 2007;22(2):129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furler J, Harris M, Rogers A. Equity and long-term condition self-management. London (UK): SAGE Publications; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey PW, Docherty B. Sisyphus and self-management: the chronic condition self-management paradox. Aust Health Rev. 2007;31(2):184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liukko J, Kuuva N. Cooperation of return-to-work professionals: the challenges of multi-actor work disability management. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1466–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar