326
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Reliability and minimal detectable change of the Challenge, an advanced motor skills test for children with cerebral palsy, Danish version

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 4485-4492 | Received 30 Sep 2020, Accepted 17 Mar 2021, Published online: 06 May 2021

References

  • Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):571–576.
  • Chiarello LA, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, et al. A multivariate model of determinants of change in gross-motor abilities and engagement in self-care and play of young children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31(2):150–168.
  • van Gorp M, Van Wely L, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Long-term course of difficulty in participation of individuals with cerebral palsy aged 16 to 34 years: a prospective cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(2):194–203.
  • Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:15082.
  • Narayanan UG. Should children with cerebral palsy exercise? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(7):597–598.
  • Novak I, Hines M, Goldsmith S, et al. Clinical prognostic messages from a systematic review on cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):e1285–e1312.
  • Frøslev-Friis C, Dunkhase-Heinl U, Andersen JD, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in Southern Denmark. Dan Med J. 2015;62:A4990.
  • Westbom L, Hagglund G, Nordmark E. Cerebral palsy in a total population of 4–11 year olds in southern Sweden. Prevalence and distribution according to different CP classification systems. BMC Pediatr. 2007;7:41.
  • Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214–223.
  • Rasmussen HM, Nordbye-Nielsen K, Moller-Madsen B, et al. The Danish cerebral palsy follow-up program. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:457–460.
  • Alriksson-Schmidt AI, Arner M, Westbom L, et al. A combined surveillance program and quality register improves management of childhood disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(8):830–836.
  • Oeffinger D, Bagley A, Rogers S, et al. Outcome tools used for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: responsiveness and minimum clinically important differences. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(12):918–925.
  • Clutterbuck GL, Auld ML, Johnston LM. High-level motor skills assessment for ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and decision tree. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(6):693–699.
  • Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, Bartlett DJ, et al. Stability and decline in gross motor function among children and youth with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 21 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(4):295–302.
  • Russell D, Rosenbaum P, Wright M, et al. Gross motor function measure (GMFM-66 and GMFM-88) user's manual. London: McKeith Press; 2013.
  • Smits DW, Gorter JW, Hanna SE, et al. Longitudinal development of gross motor function among Dutch children and young adults with cerebral palsy: an investigation of motor growth curves. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(4):378–384.
  • Alotaibi M, Long T, Kennedy E, et al. The efficacy of GMFM-88 and GMFM-66 to detect changes in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP): a literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(8):617–627.
  • Himuro N, Abe H, Nishibu H, et al. Easy-to-use clinical measures of walking ability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(10):957–968.
  • Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Cadman DT, et al. Issues in measuring change in motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a special communication. Phys Ther. 1990;70(2):125–131.
  • Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, et al. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(10):885–910.
  • Wilson A, Kavanaugh A, Moher R, et al. Development and pilot testing of the challenge module: a proposed adjunct to the Gross Motor Function Measure for high-functioning children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31(2):135–149.
  • Wright FV, Lam CY, Mistry B, et al. Evaluation of the reliability of the challenge when used to measure advanced motor skills of children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(4):382–394.
  • Clutterbuck G, Auld M, Johnston L. Active exercise interventions improve gross motor function of ambulant/semi-ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(10):1131–1151.
  • Wright V, Avery L, Fehlings D, et al. Assessing advanced motor skills in young people with cerebral palsy in GMFCS levels I and II: Rasch analysis of the challenge. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:77–78.
  • Hilderley AJ, Fehlings D, Chen JL, et al. Comparison of sports skills movement training to lower limb strength training for independently ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: a randomised feasibility trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–9.
  • Levac D, McCormick A, Levin MF, et al. Active video gaming for children with cerebral palsy: does a clinic-based virtual reality component offer an additive benefit? A pilot study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(1):74–87.
  • Sousa Junior RR, Gontijo APB, Santos TRT, et al. Measurement properties and translation to Brazilian-Portuguese of the challenge for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2020;1–18.
  • World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2011.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
  • Gibson BE, Mistry B, Wright FV. Development of child and family-centered engagement guidelines for clinical administration of the challenge to measure advanced gross motor skills: a qualitative study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(4):417–426.
  • Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21(9):1331–1335.
  • Tustin K, Gimeno H, Morton E, et al. Rater reliability and scoring duration of the Quality Function Measure in ambulant children with hyperkinetic movement disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(8):822–828.
  • Klingels K, De Cock P, Desloovere K, et al. Comparison of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test in hemiplegic CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(12):904–909.
  • Thomas SS, Buckon CE, Phillips DS, et al. Interobserver reliability of the gross motor performance measure: preliminary results. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(2):97–102.
  • Sorsdahl AB, Moe-Nilssen R, Strand LI. Observer reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, based on video recordings. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(2):146–151.
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428.
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
  • Wong RK, McEwan J, Finlayson D, et al. Reliability and validity of the Acquired Brain Injury Challenge Assessment (ABI-CA) in children. Brain Inj. 2014;28(13–14):1734–1743.
  • Almeida KM, Albuquerque KA, Ferreira ML, et al. Reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Gross Motor Function Measure in children with cerebral palsy. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(1):73–80.
  • Terwee CK, Vet CWeV, Mokkin LB. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  • Reedman S, Boyd RN, Sakzewski L. The efficacy of interventions to increase physical activity participation of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(10):1011–1018.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.