A Chinese version of the Participation Strategies Self Efficacy Scale (PS-SES): psychometric evaluation in stroke survivors

References

• Rajsic S, Gothe H, Borba HH, et al. Economic burden of stroke: a systematic review on post-stroke care. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(1):107–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Ge J. Epidemic of cardiovascular disease in China: current perspective and prospects for the future. Circulation. 2018;138(4):342–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan T, Yin A. Rehabilitation nursing. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tornbom K, Persson HC, Lundalv J, et al. The impact of physical function on participation in the first year post-stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(6):649–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel-Yeger B, Tse T, Josman N, et al. Scoping review: the trajectory of recovery of participation outcomes following stroke. Behav Neurol. 2018;2018:5472018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson T, Hammel J. Measurement of participation: intersecting person, task, and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91(9 Suppl):S29–S33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Changing self-efficacy in individuals following a first time stroke: preliminary study of a novel self-management intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):522–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Fogg L, Baum CM, et al. Validation of the Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale (PS-SES). Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):110–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Bareyre L, Gay C, Coste N, et al. French validation of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale and further psychometric properties exploration among 168 people with osteoarthritis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(3):546–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo SH, Chang AM, Chau JP. Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(3):163–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maujean A, Davis P, Kendall E, et al. The daily living self-efficacy scale: a new measure for assessing self-efficacy in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(6):504–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy M, Resnick BM, Macko RF. Reliability and validity testing of the short self-efficacy and outcome expectation for exercise scales in stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;13(5):214–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Hu F, Wu B. Interpretation of “Chinese classification of cerebrovascular diseases (2015)”. Chin J Modern Neurol Dis. 2017;17(12):865–868.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou X. Preliminary study on the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Mini-Mental State Examination in patients with stroke. Fujian (China): Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan JL, Bruno A, Li T, et al. Replication and extension of the simplified modified rankin scale in 150 Chinese stroke patients. Eur Neurol. 2012;67(4):206–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu TY, Yen CF, Chou CH, et al. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36–item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2812–2820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M. Questionnaire statistical analysis practice: SPSS operation and application. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56:27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assessment. 1994;6(4):284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Maidenhead (UK): McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Sanchez S, Korakakis V, Malliaropoulos N, et al. Validation study of the Functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring injuries in Spanish professional soccer players. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(4):711–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preparation Group of Brief Report on Stroke Prevention and treatment in China. Brief report on stroke prevention and treatment in China, 2019. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;17(5):272–281.
   Google Scholar
• Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Lyu Y, Sun Y, et al. Social participation level and its associated factors of disabled patients with different course of stroke. Chin Nurs Manage. 2020;20(3):463–469.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yan T, You L, et al. Barriers to activity and participation for stroke survivors in rural China. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(7):1222–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Magasi S, Hammel J, et al. Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(4):589–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Lin B, Zhang Z, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Work-Ability Support Scale (WSS) in young and middle-aged stroke survivors. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(4):646–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar