Decision-making aids for upper limb interventions in neurological rehabilitation: a scoping review

References

• Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, et al. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers K. Exploration of the conceptual meaningfulness of a protocol for structuring clinical reasoning and decision making related to upper limb hypertonia [dissertation]. Brisbane: The University of Queensland; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Esterman AJ. Standardizing the approach to evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers K, McKenna K. Upper limb rehabilitation following brain injury: complex, multifaceted and challenging. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72(1):20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Bennett S, Turpin M. Decision-making for occupation-centred practice with children. In: Rodger S, Kennedy-Behr A, editors. Occupation-centred practice with children: a practical guide for occupational therapists. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. p. 349–372.
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Kuipers K. Neurorehabilitation of the upper limb across the lifespan: managing hypertonicity for optimal function. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford B, Clarke S, Maddison J. Therapy interventions for children with neurodisabilities: a qualitative scoping study. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(3):1–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Kuipers K. The Hypertonicity Intervention Planning Model for upper limb neurorehabilitation. In: Copley J, Kuipers K, editors. Neurorehabilitation of the upper limb across the lifespan: Managing hypertonicity for optimal function. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 54–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Horaiya K, Akagi J, et al. Timely manner application of hand orthoses to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case report. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(3):239–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M. Upper limb rehabilitation following stroke: current evidence and future perspectives. Aging Health. 2013;9(6):629–647.
   Google Scholar
• Fong SMT, Fong KNK. Systematic review on the effectiveness of mirror therapy in training upper limb hemiparesis after stroke. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2012;22(2):84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcum S, Conroy SS, Boos A, et al. Methods for an investigation of neurophysiological and kinematic predictors of response to upper extremity repetitive task practice in chronic stroke. Arch Rehab Res Clin Transl. 2019;1(3–4):100024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wattchow KA, McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Rehabilitation interventions for upper limb function in the first four weeks following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):367–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Moser A, Haarsma FA, et al. Physiotherapists use a great variety of motor learning options in neurological rehabilitation, from which they choose through an iterative process: a retrospective think-aloud study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(17):1729–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward KS, Jolliffe L, Churilov L, et al. In search of Kipling’s six honest serving men in upper limb rehabilitation: within participant case-crossover experiment nested within a web-based questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;[9 p]. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1815873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. 3rd ed. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle S, Bennett S, Gustafsson L. Clinical decision making when addressing upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(6):254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne: Stroke Foundation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari A, Cioni G. Guidelines for rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. Eura Medicophys. 2005;41(3):243–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teasell R, Cotoi A, Chow J, et al. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. 18th ed. London (ON): Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSW Ministry of Health. Management of cerebral palsy in children: a guide for allied health professionals. New South Wales: Agency for Clinical Innovation; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers K, Burger L, Copley J. Casting for upper limb hypertonia: A retrospective study to determine the factors associated with intervention decisions. NRE. 2012;31(4):409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd RN, Morris ME, Graham HK. Management of upper limb dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2001;8(s5):150–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Copley J, Turpin M, Brosnan J, et al. Understanding and negotiating: Reasoning processes used by an occupational therapist to individualize intervention decisions for people with upper limb hypertonicity. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1486–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette DS, Okamoto SW, Rosario ER. Use of an algorithm for assessment and treatment of the upper extremity post stroke: a case study. Occup Ther Health Care. 2015;29(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens R, Bartlett H, Cooke R. Evaluation of a clinical decision-making aid for nutrition advice in age-related macular degeneration. British J Vis Impair. 2017;35(3):185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton R. Clinical reasoning in physical disabilities. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SK. Models for decision making in pediatric neurologic physical therapy. In: Campbell SK, editor. Decision making in pediatric neurologic physical therapy. Philadelphia (PA): Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. JBI levels of evidence. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hong QN, FÀBregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. EFI. 2018;34(4):285–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins english dictionary. [Internet]. Scotland: HarperCollins Publishers; 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. [Internet]. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 15]. Available from: en.oxforddictionaries.com.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Kwakkel G, Bayley M, et al. Best practice for arm recovery post stroke: an international application. Physiotherapy. 2016;102(1):1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shierk A, Jiménez-Moreno AC, Roberts H, et al. Development of a pediatric goal-centered upper limb spasticity home exercise therapy program for use in a phase-III trial of abobotulinumtoxina (Dysport®). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(2):124–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almhdawi K. Effects of occupational therapy task-oriented approach in upper extremity post-stroke rehabilitation [dissertation]. Minnesota (MN): The University of Minnesota; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Almhdawi K, Mathiowetz VG, White M, et al. Efficacy of occupational therapy task-oriented approach in upper extremity post-stroke rehabilitation. Occup Ther Int. 2016;23(4):444–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Miles TS, et al. Influence of combined afferent stimulation and task-specific training following stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(5):435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiades M, Elliott C, Wilton J, et al. The Neurological Hand Deformity Classification for children with cerebral palsy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61(6):394–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld ML, Johnston LM. Perspectives on tactile intervention for children with cerebral palsy: a framework to guide clinical reasoning and future research. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1849–1854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black L, Gaebler-Spira D. Nonsurgical treatment options for upper limb spasticity. Hand Clin. 2018;34(4):455–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck JA, Halfens J, Smeets R, et al. Concise Arm and Hand Rehabilitation Approach in Stroke (CARAS): a practical and evidence-based framework for clinical rehabilitation management. Open J Occup Ther. 2015;3(4):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Martin SM. Recommendations for best practice of occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation for motor recovery and functional outcomes [dissertation]. Boston (MA): Boston University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Garbellini S, Wilton J. The Neurological Hand Deformity Classification (NHDC) manual. 2nd ed. [Western Australia]: [publisher unknown]; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock NJ, Collins K, Dorer C, et al. Evidence-based practice ‘on-the-go’: using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(3):e000592.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly G, Moys R, Burrough M, et al. Rehabilitation in practice: improving delivery of upper limb rehabilitation for children and young people with acquired brain injuries through the development and implementation of a clinical pathway. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;[8 p]. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1761891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn L, Busse M, Dal Bello-Haas V. Management of upper extremity dysfunction in people with Parkinson disease and Huntington disease: facilitating outcomes across the disease lifespan. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):148–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton J. Orthotic intervention and casting in the presence of neurological dysfunction. In: Wilton J, editor. Hand splinting orthotic intervention: principles of design and fabrication. Western Australia: Vivid Publishing; 2013. p. 195–235.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers K, Grice JW. The structure of novice and expert occupational therapists' clinical reasoning before and after exposure to a domain-specific protocol. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(6):418–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers K, Grice JW. Clinical reasoning in neurology: Use of the repertory grid technique to investigate the reasoning of an experienced occupational therapist. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(4):275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers K. Exploration of the conceptual meaningfulness of a protocol for structuring clinical reasoning and decision making related to upper limb hypertonia [dissertation]. Brisbane: The University of Queensland; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Ashford S, Esquenazi A, et al. A comprehensive person-centered approach to adult spastic paresis: a consensus-based framework. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(4):605–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzelepis F, Sanson-Fisher RW, Zucca AC, et al. Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Playford ED, Siegert R, Levack W, et al. Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):334–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, Levack WMM. Rehabilitation goal setting: theory, practice, and evidence. Florida (FL): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong MJ. Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(2):84–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burridge J, Alt Murphy M, Buurke J, et al. A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: what recommendations are made for upper limb assessment? Front Neurol. 2019;10(567):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poltawski L, Allison R, Briscoe S, et al. Assessing the impact of upper limb disability following stroke: a qualitative enquiry using internet-based personal accounts of stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(10):945–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EEH, van Peppen RPS, et al. KNGF clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Netherlands: Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Coscia M, Wessel MJ, Chaudary U, et al. Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke. Brain. 2019;142(8):2182–2197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guggisberg AG, Nicolo P, Cohen LG, et al. Longitudinal structural and functional differences between proportional and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(12):1029–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt A, Murray CM, Kennedy K, et al. Effectiveness of distance learning strategies for continuing professional development (CPD) for rural allied health practitioners: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar P, Turton A, Cramp M, et al. Management of hemiplegic shoulder pain: A UK-wide online survey of physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice.Physiother Res Int. 2021;26(1):e1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassafiani M, Copley J, Kuipers K, et al. Are explanatory randomized controlled trials feasible in rehabilitation? Int J Ther Rehab. 2008;15(11):478–479.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA. Cutting edge’ developments in neuropsychological rehabilitation and possible future directions. Brain Impairment. 2011;12(1):33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariton E, Locascio JJ. Randomised controlled trials – the gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG . 2018;125(13):1716–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedorn R. Clinical decision making in familiar cases: a model of the process and implications for practice. Br J Occup Ther. 1996;59(5):217–222.
   Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Iliopoulos G, Wai Shun PL, et al. The clinical reasoning that guides therapists in interpreting errors in real-world performance. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(6):E18–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdar U, Wallin L, Heiwe S. Why do we do as we do? Factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making among physiotherapists in an acute setting. Physiother Res Int. 2013;18(4):220–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson HL, Nixon-Cave K. A tool for clinical reasoning and reflection using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework and patient management model. Phys Ther. 2011;91(3):416–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linda R, Dennis LH. Using clinical outcomes to identify expert physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2003;83(11):990–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oven A, Lobe B. Creative occupational therapist: It's about the client using focus groups to explore creativity in occupational therapy. J Creat Behav. 2020;54(1):51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otterman NM, Maas M, Schiemanck SK, et al. Development and validity of an innovative test to assess guideline-consistent clinical reasoning by physical therapists in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(6):0–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G, Horn SD, Gassaway JA, et al. Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):678–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth C. Measuring the outcome of occupational therapy: Tools and resources. Aust Occ Ther J. 2000;47(4):147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Colclough S, Copley J, Turpin M, et al. Occupational therapists' perceptions of requirements for competent upper limb hypertonicity practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(16):1416–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(3):164–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delany C, Golding C. Teaching clinical reasoning by making thinking visible: an action research project with allied health clinical educators. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jelles F, Van Bennekom CAM, Lankhorst GJ. Instruments to structure interdisciplinary team conferences in rehabilitation medicine: added value of the rehabilitation activities profile. J Rehab Sci. 1995;8(2):51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Finger ME, Selb M, De Bie R, et al. Using the international classification of functioning, disability and health in physiotherapy in multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation: a case study of low back pain. Physiother Res Int. 2015;20(4):231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoef J, Toussaint PJ, Putter H, et al. The impact of the implementation of a rehabilitation tool on the contents of the communication during multidisciplinary team conferences in rheumatology. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(11–12):856–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, et al. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82(11):1098–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Lindstrand J, Neher M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment program. Disab Rehab. 2003;25(10):497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH, et al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1482–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting document for the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation [Internet]. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2014 [cited 2019 Aug 15]. Available from: https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI%20Levels%20of%20Evidence%20Supporting%20Documents-v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bello-Haas VD. A framework for rehabilitation of neurodegenerative diseases: planning care and maximizing quality of life. Neurol Rep. 2002;26(3):115–129.
   Google Scholar