Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale in Spanish population

References

• World Health Organization. Summary world report on disability. World Health Organization; 2011. p. 1–24 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html%0Ahttp://www.larchetoronto.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/launch-of-World-Report-on-Disability-Jan-27-121.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios A, Romañach J. El modelo de la diversidad: la bioética y los derechos humanos como herramientas Para alcanzar la plena dignidad en la diversidad funcional. Diversitas. 2006;1:13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios A, Javier R. Diversity approach: a new view on bioethics from the functionally diverse (disabled) people. Diversitas. 2007;1:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Simplican SC, Leader G, Kosciulek J, et al. Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an ecological model of social networks and community participation. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;38:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C. Social inclusion and people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: a systematic review. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;37(4):360–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason C, Weber J. What predictors are associated with the social inclusion of people with disabilities? A comparison of community-based rehabilitation participants to the general population in Vietnam. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(6):815–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corthouts J, Thibaut E, Breuer C, et al. Social inclusion in sports clubs across Europe: determinants of social innovation. Innovation. 2020;33:21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities; 2006 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• García-González JM, Gutiérrez Gómez-Calcerrada S, Solera Hernández E, et al. Barriers in higher education: perceptions and discourse analysis of students with disabilities in Spain. Disabil Soc. 2021;36(4):579–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requero B, Santos D, Paredes B, et al. Attitudes toward hiring people with disabilities: a meta‐cognitive approach to persuasion. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2020;50(5):276–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khayatzadeh-Mahani A, Wittevrongel K, Nicholas DB, et al. Prioritizing barriers and solutions to improve employment for persons with developmental disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(19):2696–2706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palad YY, Barquia RB, Domingo HC, et al. Scoping review of instruments measuring attitudes toward disability. Disabil Health J. 2016;9(3):354–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gething L, Wheeler B. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: a new Australian instrument to measure attitudes towards people with disabilities. Aust J Psychol. 1992;44(2):75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gething L. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. J Soc Behav Personal. 1994;9:23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wallymahmed AH, Mckay-Moffat SF, Cunningham CC. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: a validation with UK midwives. Soc Behav Pers. 2007;35(8):1049–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Palmer JK, Coker-Juneau CJ, et al. Factor structure and construct validity of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 2003;63(3):465–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bania TA, Antoniou A-S, Theodoritsi M, et al. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: translation and cross-cultural validation into Greek. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;0:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hutzler Y. Attitudes toward the participation of individuals with disabilities in physical activity: a review. Quest. 2003;55(4):347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reina R, Hutzler Y, Iniguez-Santiago MC, et al. Student attitudes toward inclusion in physical education: the impact of ability beliefs, gender, and previous experiences. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2019;36(1):132–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vornholt K, Uitdewilligen S, Nijhuis FJN. Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: a literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):463–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo RC, Azuma S, Palmer G, et al. Medical students' attitudes toward persons with disability: a comparative study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1537–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Morris C, Abraham C, et al. Children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a cross-sectional study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):879–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan M, Tarrant M, Abraham C, et al. The association between children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(6):529–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny NH, Kasar J, Sinay T. Student attitudes toward persons with mental illness: the influence of course work and level I fieldwork. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;28:217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Yazbeck M, McVilly K, Parmenter TR. Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2004;15(2):97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero-Dios H, Pérez C. Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: considerations about test selection in psychological research. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2007;7:863–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretero-Dios H, Pérez C. Normas Para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2005;5:521–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios A, Romañach J, Ferreira MAV, et al. Functional diversity, bioethics and sociological theory: a new approach to disability. Rev Soc Pens Crít. 2012;6:115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Sandín B, Chorot P, Lostaos L, et al. Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: validación factorial y convergencia transcultural [The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect: factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence]. Psicothema. 1999;11:37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens LF, Getachew MA, Perrin PB, et al. Factor analysis of the Spanish Multidimensional Attitudes Scale toward persons with disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2013;58(4):396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood CE. The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychol Bull. 1952;49(3):197–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenaro C, Flores N, López-Lucas J. Using the Semantic Differential Technique to assess stereotypes toward individuals with disabilities: the relevance of warmth and competence. Univ Psychol. 2018;17:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child D. The essentials of factor analysis. 3th ed. London: Continuum; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. California: Pearson; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline P. Personality: the psychometric view. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Asendorpf JB, Conner M, De Fruyt F, et al. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. Eur J Pers. 2013;27(2):108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q, Tian Q, Hao C, et al. Comparison of attitudes toward disability and people with disability among caregivers, the public, and people with disability: findings from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patka M, Keys CB, Henry DB, et al. Attitudes of Pakistani community members and staff toward people with intellectual disability. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;118(1):32–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uysal A, Albayrak B, Koçulu B, et al. Attitudes of nursing students toward people with disabilities. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(5):878–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin D, Valois P, Crocker AG, et al. Attitudes of health care professionals toward people with intellectual disability: a comparison with the general population. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(9):746–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin D, Rivard M, Crocker AG, et al. Public attitudes towards intellectual disability: a multidimensional perspective. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(3):279–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar