2,351
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Hearing healthcare for workers with hearing loss: audiologists’ experiences and views

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 7861-7871 | Received 04 Mar 2021, Accepted 28 Oct 2021, Published online: 24 Nov 2021

References

  • Backenroth GA, Ahlner BH. Quality of life of hearing-impaired persons who have participated in audiological rehabilitation counselling. Int J Adv Couns. 2000;22(3):225–240.
  • Morata TC, Themann CL, Randolph RF, et al. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers. Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):529–545.
  • Mathews L. Unlimited potential? A research report into hearing loss in the workplace. London: Action on Hearing Loss; 2011.
  • Scherich DL. Job accommodations in the workplace for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing: current practices and recommendations. J Rehab. 1996;62(2):27.
  • Hua H, Anderzen-Carlsson A, Widen S, et al. Conceptions of working life among employees with mild-moderate aided hearing impairment: a phenomenographic study. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(11):873–880.
  • Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Houtgast T. Occupational performance: comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam checklist for hearing and work. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(9):503–512.
  • Gellerstedt LC, Danermark B. Hearing impairment, working life conditions, and gender. Scand J Disabil Res. 2004;6(3):225–245.
  • Nachtegaal J, Kuik DJ, Anema JR, et al. Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: results from an internet-based national survey on hearing. Int J Audiol. 2009;48(10):684–691.
  • Canton K, Williams W. The consequences of noise-induced hearing loss on dairy farm communities in New Zealand. J Agromedicine. 2012;17(4):354–363.
  • Department for Work & Pensions, Department of Health & Social care. The employment of disabled people. In: care DfWPaDoHS, editor. London (UK): Gov.UK; 2020.
  • Office for National Statistics. Employment rate (aged 16 to 64, seasonally adjusted). Online: Office for National Statistics; 2021.
  • Shield B. Hearing loss- Numbers and costs; evaluation of the social and economic costs of hearing impairment. In: AISBL ArfH-I. London: Brunel University London; 2018.
  • International Longevity Centre. Commission on hearing loss: Final report. London (UK): International Longevity Centre; 2014.
  • Greengross S. Commission on hearing loss: final report. London (UK): International Longevity Centre. 2014; p.1–38.
  • Granberg S, Gustafsson J. Key findings about hearing loss in the working-life: a scoping review from a well-being perspective. Int J Audiol. 2021;60(supp2):60–11.
  • Yoder S, Pratt S. Audiologists who have hearing loss: demographics and specific accommodations needs. J Acad Rehabilit Audiol. 2005;38:11–29.
  • Kramer SE. Hearing impairment, work, and vocational enablement. Int J Audiol. 2008;47:S124–S30.
  • Backenroth GA, Ahlner BH. Hearing loss in working life-some aspects of audiological rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21(3):331–334.
  • Punch R. Employment and adults who are deaf or hard of hearing: current status and experiences of barriers, accommodations, and stress in the workplace. Am Ann Deaf. 2016;161(3):384–397.
  • Trotter AR, Matt SB, Wojnar D. Communication strategies and accommodations utilized by health care providers with hearing loss: A pilot study. 2014.
  • Shaw L, Jennings MB, Poost-Foroosh L, et al. Innovations in workplace accessibility and accommodation for persons with hearing loss: using social networking and community of practice theory to promote knowledge exchange and change. Work. 2013;46(2):221–229.
  • Arrowsmith L. Managing hearing loss when seeking or in employment. London: Action of Hearing Loss; 2016.
  • Shaw L, Tetlaff B, Jennings MB, et al. The standpoint of persons with hearing loss on work disparities and workplace accommodations. Work. 2013;46(2):193–204.
  • Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):257–265.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London; Sage; 2013.
  • Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London; Sage; 2006.
  • Dey I. Qualitative research. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, NewYork; Routledge, 1993.
  • Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, et al. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociol Method Res. 2013;42(3):294–320.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hearing loss in adults: assessment and management (NICE Guideline 98). 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng98
  • BSA. Common principles of rehabilitation for adults in audiology services. Practice Guidance. Bathgate: British Society of Audiology; 2016.
  • Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Levesque A, et al. Patient-centred care: a review for rehabilitative audiologists. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(Suppl 1):S60–S7.
  • Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Levesque A, et al. Patient-centred audiological rehabilitation: perspectives of older adults who own hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:S68–S75.
  • Woolf K, Cave J, McManus IC, et al. It gives you an understanding you can't get from any book. The relationship between medical students' and doctors' personal illness experiences and their performance: a qualitative and quantitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7(1):1–8.
  • Mallory TH. Lessons from the other side of the knife. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 Suppl 1):2–4.
  • NHS Improvement. Pushing the boundaries: Evidence to support the delivery of good practice in audiology. London (UK): NHS Improvement, 2010.
  • Henwood F, Wyatt S, Hart A, et al. 'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25(6):589–607.
  • Neal RD, Hussain-Gambles M, Allgar VL, et al. Reasons for and consequences of missed appointments in general practice in the UK: questionnaire survey and prospective review of medical records. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6(1):47–46.
  • Wallhagen MI. The stigma of hearing loss. Gerontologist. 2010;50(1):66–75.
  • Kirkwood DH. Thinking positively about ‘09. Hear J. 2008;61(12):4.
  • Maidment DW, Barker AB, Xia J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(10):721–729.
  • Coleman CK, Muñoz K, Ong CW, et al. Opportunities for audiologists’ to use patient-centered communication during hearing device monitoring encounters. Semin Hear. 2018;39(1):32–43.
  • Graaf R, Bijl RV. Geestelijke gezondheid van doven: psychische problematiek en zorggebruik van dove en ernstig slechthorende volwassenen. Netherlands: Trimbos-Instituut; 1998.
  • Muñoz K, Ong CW, Borrie SA, et al. Audiologists' communication behaviour during hearing device management appointments. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(5):328–336.
  • Miller WR. Qualitative research findings as evidence: utility in nursing practice. Clin Nurse Spec. 2010;24(4):191–193.
  • Sandelowski M. "To be of use": enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nurs Outlook. 1997;45(3):125–132.