Understanding decision-making in prosthetic rehabilitation by prosthetists and people with lower limb amputation: a qualitative study

References

• Madsen UR, Baath C, Berthelsen CB, Hommel A. Age and health-related quality of life, general self-efficacy, and functional level 12 months following dysvascular major lower limb amputation: a prospective longitudinal study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;41:2900–2909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renstrom P, Grimby G, Larsson E. Thigh muscle strength in below-knee amputees. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1983;9:163–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, Polomski W, et al. Physical capacity and walking ability after lower limb amputation: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(11):999–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakov E, Burger H, Gregori,   et al. Isokinetic and isometric strength of the thigh muscles in below-knee amputees. Clin Biomech. 1996;11(4):232–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14–15):837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJ, Arokiasamy P. Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(1):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. ‘Don't you talk to your prosthetist?’ Communicational problems in the prescription of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(6):513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostler C, Ellis-Hill C, Donovan-Hall M. Expectations of rehabilitation following lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1169–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansam K, O'Connor RJ, Neumann V, et al. Clinicians' perspectives on decision making in lower limb amputee rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(5):447–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(8):563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baars EC, Schrier E, Dijkstra PU, et al. Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: a systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires. Medicine. 2018;97(39):e12296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey R, McFarland LV, Cooper RA, et al. Unilateral lower-limb loss: prosthetic device use and functional outcomes in servicemembers from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):317–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugawara AT, Ramos VD, Alfieri FM, et al. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht GL, Higgins PC. Rehabilitation success: the interrelationships of multiple criteria. J Health Soc Behav. 1978;18(1):36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain. 1986;24(3):331–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systemic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;165(2):174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, et al. Patients' expectations predict surgery outcomes: a meta-analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(1):49–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, et al. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1314–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Rehabilitation of Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation Work Group TOoQ, Safety and Value, VA, Washington, DC, Office of Evidence Based Practice, U.S. Army Medical Command. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for rehabilitation of individuals with lower limb amputation. Department of Vetreans Affairs DoD, ed. Vol. 2.0. Washington, DC; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, et al. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2085–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquenazi A. Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14–15):831–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, NiMhurchadha S, Gallagher P, et al. Identifying the values and preferences of prosthetic users: a case study series using the repertory grid technique. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(2):157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for rehabilitation of lower limb amputation. Department of Veterans Affairs & Department of Defense; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik LJ, Borgia ML. Factors associated with utilization of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation services by patients with amputation in the VA system: an observational study. Phys Ther. 2013;93(9):1197–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etter K, Borgia M, Resnik L. Prescription and repair rates of prosthetic limbs in the VA healthcare system: implications for national prosthetic parity. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(6):493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey R. Predictive outcome measures versus functional outcome measures in the lower limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006;18(6):51–60.
   Google Scholar
• van Twillert S, Geertzen J, Hemminga T, et al. Reconsidering evidence-based practice in prosthetic rehabilitation: a shared enterprise. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37(3):203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JH, Stevens PM, Wurdeman SR. OASIS 1: retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020;7:2055668320968476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Miller WC. Goal attainment scaling in the rehabilitation of patients with lower-extremity amputations: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):771–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Karpin H, Lak A, et al. Participation in occupational performance: reliability and validity of the activity card sort. OTJR-Occup Partic Health. 2003;23(1):10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas P, Hefford C, Tumilty S. The use of the patient-specific functional scale to measure rehabilitative progress in a physiotherapy setting. J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20(3):147–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thyer L, Brown T, Roe D. The validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM) when used in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting with older adults. Occup Ther Health Care. 2018;32(2):137–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Thompson R. Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. 3rd ed. Oxford; New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(1):114–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roter DL, Hall JA, Merisca R, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 1998;36(8):1138–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(4):CD001431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Borrenpohl D, Kaluf B, Major MJ. Survey of US practitioners on the validity of the medicare functional classification level system and utility of clinical outcome measures for aiding K-Level assignment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(7):1053–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon SA, Winch PJ. Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters: an essential analysis step in applied qualitative research. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(5):e000837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London; Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley M, Dillon MP, Fatone S. Development of shared decision-making resources to help inform difficult healthcare decisions: an example focused on dysvascular partial foot and transtibial amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(4):378–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock DD, Nowels CT, Masoudi FA, et al. Patient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(12):1634–1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Nowels C, Kutner JS, et al. Shared decision making and the use of a patient decision aid in advanced serious illness: provider and patient perspectives. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):3236–3247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieringa TH, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Spencer-Bonilla G, et al. Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lum HD, Jordan SR, Brungardt A, et al. Framing advance care planning in Parkinson disease: patient and care partner perspectives. Neurology. 2019;92(22):e2571–e2579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017;359:j4891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ, Schaepper H, et al. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: an updated systematic literature review. Technol Innov. 2016;18(2–3):125–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwyn G, Cochran N, Pignone M. Shared decision making–the importance of diagnosing preferences. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(9):1239–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor AM, Drake ER, Fiset V, et al. The Ottawa patient decision aids. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2(4):163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar