Getting to know our patients and what matters: exploring the elicitation of patient values, preferences, and circumstances in neurological rehabilitation

References

• Vingerhoets C, Hay-Smith J, Graham F. Intersection of the elements of evidence-based practice in interdisciplinary stroke reh-abilitation: a qualitative study. N Z J Physiother. 2020;48(3):148-154.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5(1):1–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiteside M, Smith R, Gazarek J, et al. A framework for enabling evidence-based practice in allied health. Aust Soc Work. 2016;69(4):417–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe A. Institute of medicine report: crossing the quality chasm: a new health care system for the 21st century. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2001;2(3):233–235.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan S, Yoder LH. A concept analysis of person-centered care. J Holist Nurs. 2012;30(1):6–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siminoff LA. Incorporating patient and family preferences into evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl 3):S6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Street RL, Jr., Elwyn G, Epstein RM. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):167–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardsson S, Samsson KS, Johansson K, et al. A preference for dialogue: Exploring the influence of patient preferences on clinical decision making and treatment in primary care physiotherapy. Eur J Physiother. 2019;21(2):107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan PF, Strombom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(3):257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang E, Bell NR, Dickinson JA, et al. Eliciting patient values and preferences to inform shared decision making in preventive screening. Can Fam Physician. 2018;64(1):28–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wensing M, Elwyn G. Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care. BMJ. 2003;326(7394):877–879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM. What are values, utilities, and preferences? A clarification in the context of decision making in health care, and an exploration of measurement issues. Handbook of health decision science. New York (NY): Springer; 2016. p. 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ. 2012;345:e6572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YK, Low WY, Ng CJ. Exploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative study. PLOS One. 2013;8(11):e80051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastemeijer CM, Voogt L, van Ewijk JP, et al. What do patient values and preferences mean? A taxonomy based on a systematic review of qualitative papers. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(5):871–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidani S, Epstein D, Miranda J. Eliciting patient treatment preferences: a strategy to integrate evidence-based and patient-centered care. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3(3):116–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers H, Price C. Stroke unit care, inpatient rehabilitation and early supported discharge. Clin Med. 2017;17(2):173–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean SG, Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Interprofessional rehabilitation: a person-centred approach. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. London, England: SAGE Publications Sage UK; 2020. p. 571–583.
   Google Scholar
• Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, et al. Qualitative description-the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9.52. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler R. Transcription tips and tricks [blog]: Academic Consulting; 2016. Available from: https://www.academic-consulting.co.nz/blog/transcription-tips-and-tricks.php.
   Google Scholar
• Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilson JK, Settle SM, Sullivan KJ. Application of evidence-based practice strategies: current trends in walking recovery interventions poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(3):227–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastemeijer CM, van Ewijk JP, Hazelzet JA, et al. Patient values in physiotherapy practice, a qualitative study. Physiother Res Int. 2021;26(1):e1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD. Value assessment at the point of care: incorporating patient values throughout care delivery and a draft taxonomy of patient values. Value Health. 2017;20(2):292–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong MJ. Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(2):84–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slade D, Manidis M, McGregor J, et al. Communicating in hospital emergency departments. Sydney: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Frille A, et al. Top tips to deal with challenging situations: doctor-patient interactions. Breathe. 2017;13(2):129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Mangin D, Stephen G, Bismah V, et al. Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A, Ebrahim S. Measuring patients’ preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(Supplement 1):i2–i8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Col NF, Solomon AJ, Springmann V, et al. Whose preferences matter? A patient-centered approach for eliciting treatment goals. Med Decis Making. 2018;38(1):44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Velde D, Devisch I, De Vriendt P. The client-centred approach as experienced by male neurological rehabilitation clients in occupational therapy. A qualitative study based on a grounded theory tradition. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(16):1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Peters E. Beyond information: exploring patients' preferences. JAMA. 2009;302(2):195–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant S, Tyson SF. A multicentre study of how goal-setting is practised during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(2):263–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, et al. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(6):501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott S, Fleming J, Doig E. Goal setting approaches and principles used in rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic scoping review. Brain Inj. 2015;29(13–14):1515–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker J, de Groot V, Ter Steeg AM, et al. Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: rationale and practical tool. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörfler E, Kulnik ST. Despite communication and cognitive impairment – person-centred goal-setting after stroke: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(25):3628–3637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FA, Boland P, Rutherford SJ, et al. Implementing a client-centred approach in rehabilitation: an autoethnography. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Sintler C, Pandyan AD, et al. Is the practice of goal-setting for patients in acute stroke care patient-centred and what factors influence this? A qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(5):508–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan S, Hay CC, Pappadis MR, et al. Stroke survivors' perspectives on post-acute rehabilitation options, goals, satisfaction, and transition to home. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(3):160–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ministry of Health. Te tiriti o waitangi framework. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Physiotherapy Board of New Zealand. Cultural competence standard. Physiotherapy standards. Wellington: Physiotherapy Board of New Zealand; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pitama SG, Bennett ST, Waitoki W, et al. A proposed Hauora Māori clinical guide for psychologists: using the hui process and meihana model in clinical assessment and formulation. N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;46:7–11.
   Google Scholar