261
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Measurement invariance of the 12-item self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 across early and late adolescents in Canada

, , &
Pages 3118-3124 | Received 18 Jan 2022, Accepted 25 Aug 2022, Published online: 09 Sep 2022

References

  • Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815–823.
  • Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, et al. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule: WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  • Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, et al. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2347–2380.
  • World Health Organization. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Ferro MA, Lipman EL, Van Lieshout RJ, et al. Cohort profile: Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life-Course (MY LIFE) study. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30(2):104–115.
  • van de Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J. Developmetrics: a checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2012;9(4):486–492.
  • Hu L, Zang YL, Li N. The applicability of WHODAS 2.0 in adolescents in China. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(17–18):2438–2451.
  • Tompke BK, Tang J, Oltean II, et al. Measurement invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 across youth with and without physical or mental conditions. Assessment. 2020;27(7):1490–1501.
  • Kimber M, Rehm J, Ferro MA. Measurement invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 in a population-based sample of youth. PLOS One. 2015;10(11):e0142385.
  • Elsman EBM, van Nispen RMA, van Rens G. Feasibility of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) and Young Adults (PAI-YA) with a visual impairment: a pilot study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):98.
  • Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, et al. Development of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth: conceptual basis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):238–246.
  • Bedell G, Coster W. Measuring participation of school-aged children with traumatic brain injuries: considerations and approaches. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23(4):220–229.
  • Bedell G. Further validation of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP). Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(5):342–351.
  • De Bock F, Bosle C, Graef C, et al. Measuring social participation in children with chronic health conditions: validation and reference values of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP) in the German context. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):125.
  • Golos A, Bedell G. Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP) across a 3-year period for children and youth with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38(4):311–319.
  • Golos A, Bedell G. Responsiveness and discriminant validity of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation across three years for children and youth with traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurorehabil. 2018;21(7):431–438.
  • McDougall J, Bedell G, Wright V. The youth report version of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP): assessment of psychometric properties and comparison with parent report. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(4):512–522.
  • Elsman EBM, van Nispen RMA, van Rens G. First stage psychometric testing of a new instrument for adolescents with visual impairment: the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) 13–17 years. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4(1):62.
  • Elsman EBM, van Nispen RMA, van Rens G. Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) 0–2 years with visual impairment. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(3):775–781.
  • Elsman EBM, van Rens G, van Nispen RMA. Psychometric properties of a new intake questionnaire for visually impaired young adults: the Participation and Activity Inventory for Young Adults (PAI-YA). PLOS One. 2018;13(8):e0201701.
  • Coster W, Bedell G, Law M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(11):1030–1037.
  • Khetani M, Marley J, Baker M, et al. Validity of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth (PEM-CY) for Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in sustainable development projects. Disabil Health J. 2014;7(2):226–235.
  • Canino GJ, Fisher PW, Alegria M, et al. Assessing child impairment in functioning in different contexts: implications for use of services and the classification of psychiatric disorders. Open J Med Psychol. 2013;2(1):29–34.
  • Federici S, Balboni G, Buracchi A, et al. WHODAS-Child: psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 for children and youth among Italian children with autism spectrum disorder. Disabil Rehabil. 2022. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2071481
  • Hamdani SU, Huma ZE, Wissow L, et al. Measuring functional disability in children with developmental disorders in low-resource settings: validation of Developmental Disorders-Children Disability Assessment Schedule (DD-CDAS) in rural Pakistan. Glob Ment Health. 2020;7:e17.
  • Scorza P, Stevenson A, Canino G, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for Children, WHODAS-Child in Rwanda. PLOS One. 2013;8(3):e57725.
  • Sousa C, Amante MJ, Fonseca S, editors. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the instrument WHODAS 2.0 child and youth. International Congress of Health and Wellbeing Intervention. Viseu: University Campus of Viseu of the Piaget Institute; 2019.
  • Betancourt T, Scorza P, Kanyanganzi F, et al. HIV and child mental health: a case-control study in Rwanda. Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):e464–e472.
  • Betancourt TS, Ng LC, Kirk CM, et al. Family-based promotion of mental health in children affected by HIV: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(8):922–930.
  • Hamdani SU, Minhas FA, Iqbal Z, et al. Model for service delivery for developmental disorders in low-income countries. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):1166–1172.
  • Ng LC, Kanyanganzi F, Munyanah M, et al. Developing and validating the Youth Conduct Problems Scale-Rwanda: a mixed methods approach. PLOS One. 2014;9(6):e100549.
  • Coombes L, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, et al. Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: a systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(7):1803–1832.
  • Riley AW. Evidence that school-age children can self-report on their health. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4(4 Suppl.):371–376.
  • Rajmil L, Lopez AR, Lopez-Aguila S, et al. Parent–child agreement on health-related quality of life (HRQOL): a longitudinal study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:101.
  • Ellert U, Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, et al. Determinants of agreement between self-reported and parent-assessed quality of life for children in Germany-results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1):102.
  • De Civita M, Regier D, Alamgir AH, et al. Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(7):659–685.
  • Hemmingsson H, Olafsdottir LB, Egilson ST. Agreements and disagreements between children and their parents in health-related assessments. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(11):1059–1072.
  • Committee on Hospital Care and Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care. Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics. 2012;129(2):394–404.
  • Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis. Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Database][Mismatch
  • Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.
  • World Health Organization. Adolescent health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
  • Ferro MA, Lipman EL, Van Lieshout RJ, et al. Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life-Course (MY LIFE): protocol of a Canadian prospective study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e034544.
  • Sheehan DV, Sheehan KH, Shytle RD, et al. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(3):313–326.
  • Georgiades K, Duncan L, Wang L, et al. Six-month prevalence of mental disorders and service contacts among children and youth in Ontario: evidence from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study. Can J Psychiatry. 2019;64(4):246–255.
  • Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) – mental health. User guide: microdata files. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013.
  • Kessler RC, Ustun TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):93–121.
  • Rehm J, Ustun TB, Saxena S, et al. On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1999;8(2):110–122.
  • Millsap RE, Yun-Tein J. Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004;39(3):479–515.
  • Ferro MA, Boyle MH. Longitudinal invariance of measurement and structure of global self-concept: a population-based study examining trajectories among adolescents with and without chronic illness. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(4):425–437.
  • Zelman JJ, Ferro MA. Psychometric properties of the Parental Stress Scale in families of children with chronic physical conditions. Fam Relat. 2018;67(2):240–252.
  • Ferro MA, Boyle MH, Scott JG, et al. The Child Behavior Checklist and Youth self-report in adolescents with epilepsy: testing measurement invariance of the attention and thought problems subscales. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;31(1):34–42.
  • Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Eq Model. 2007;14(3):464–504.
  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Eq Model. 2002;9(2):233–255.
  • Brown TA. In: Little TD, editor. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2015.
  • Chavira DA, Garland AF, Daley S, et al. The impact of medical comorbidity on mental health and functional health outcomes among children with anxiety disorders. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29(5):394–402.
  • Hepner KA, Sechrest L. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 50 in a predominantly minority sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(8):763–773.
  • Steinmetz H. Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology. 2013;9(1):1–12.
  • Cole DA, Ciesla JA, Steiger JH. The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychol Methods. 2007;12(4):381–398.
  • Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, et al. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013;73(6):913–934.
  • Fortin M, Haggerty J, Sanche S, et al. Self-reported versus health administrative data: implications for assessing chronic illness burden in populations. A cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(3):E729–E733.
  • Robinson JR, Young TK, Roos LL, et al. Estimating the burden of disease. Comparing administrative data and self-reports. Med Care. 1997;35(9):932–947.
  • Tisnado D, Chen WP, Liu HH, et al. What is the concordance between patient self-report and medical record as a data source for medication use? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:214.
  • Baumeister H, Kriston L, Bengel J, et al. High agreement of self-report and physician-diagnosed somatic conditions yields limited bias in examining mental–physical comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(5):558–565.
  • Boyle MH, Duncan L, Georgiades K, et al. Classifying child and adolescent psychiatric disorder by problem checklists and standardized interviews. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017;26(4):e1544.
  • McDonald E, Whitney S, Horricks L, et al. Parent–child agreement on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30:264–272.
  • Duncan L, Boyle M, Ferro MA, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). Psychol Assess. 2018;30(7):916–928.
  • Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Green J, et al. National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A): III. Concordance of DSM-IV/CIDI diagnoses with clinical reassessments. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):386–399.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.