Stroke survivors’ views on their priorities for upper-limb recovery and the availability of therapy services after stroke: a longitudinal, phenomenological study

References

• Tallis R. The hand: a philosophical inquiry into human being. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Carey LM, Matyas TA. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(3):257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Adams N. Stroke survivors’ experiences of somatosensory impairment after stroke: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(2):150–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle SD, Bennett S, Dudgeon B. Upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: the survivor’s experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(12):993–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine S. The Bobath concept: developments and current theoretical underpinning. In: Raine S, Meadows L, Lynch-Ellerington M, editors. Bobath concept: theory and clinical practice in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell; 2009. p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JW, Ivanova TD, Brouwer B, et al. Do performance measures of strength, balance, and mobility predict quality of life community re-integration after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(4):713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Purton J, Sim J, Hunter SM. The experience of upper-limb dysfunction after stroke: a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(23):3377–3386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesendanger M, Kazennikov O, Perrig S, et al. Two hands – one action: the problem of bimanual coordination. In: Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR, editors. Hand and brain: the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements. London: Academic Press; 1996. p. 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Walters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Champion J, Barber C, Ellerington M. Recovery of upper limb function. In: Raine S, Meadows L, Lynch-Ellerington M, editors. Bobath concept: theory and clinical practice in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell; 2009. p. 154–181.
   Google Scholar
• Sabari J, Meisler J, Silver E. Reflections upon rehabilitation by members of a community based stroke club. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(7):330–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, et al. Patients’ expectations of recovery following stroke: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(16):841–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(20-21):1566–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Magin P, Pollack MRP. Stroke patients’ experiences with the Australian health system: a qualitative study. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(2):81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltawski L, Allison R, Briscoe S, et al. Assessing the impact of upper limb disability following stroke: a qualitative enquiry using internet-based personal accounts of stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(10):945–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(20):1213–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe C, Rudd A, McKevitt C, et al. Top ten priorities for stroke services research: a summary of an analysis of research for the national stroke strategy. London: King’s College, University of London; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. The importance of the patient’s subjective experience in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(1):30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay L. Phenomenology for therapists; researching the lived world. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. Giorgi B. Phenomenology. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage; 2003. p. 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt D, Smith JA. The personal experience of carers of stroke survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(16):1000–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour R. Doing focus groups. London: Sage; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(5):690–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Focus groups: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur S, Mitchell M, Lewis J, et al. Designing fieldwork. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2014. p. 147–176.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen E. Successful qualitative health research: a practical introduction. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G, et al. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2014. p. 111–146.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [Internet]. Rockville (MD): National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 2010 [accessed 2020 Jun]. Available from: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/sites/default/files/NIH_Stroke_Scale_Booklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin M, Shaw R, Flowers P. Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qual Res Psychol. 2019;16(2):182–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. J Adm Gov. 2009;4(2):72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Member validation and check. In: Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF, editors. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004. p. 633.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson A, Andersson S-O, Carlberg B. ‘If only I manage to get home I’ll get better’ – interviews with stroke patients after emergency stay in hospital on their experiences and needs. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkevold M. The unfolding illness trajectory of stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(17):887–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Reasons for recovery after stroke: a perspective based on personal experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):507–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendz M. The first year of rehabilitation after a stroke – from two perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci. 2003;17(3):215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilertsen G, Kirkevold M, Bjørk IT. Recovering from a stroke: a longitudinal, qualitative study of older Norwegian women. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(13-14):2004–2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Using stroke to explore the life thread model: an alternative approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. Clinical effectiveness and evaluation unit on behalf of the intercollegiate stroke working party. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP): acute organisational audit report. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, et al. Early rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19(12):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borschmann KN, Hayward KS. Recovery of upper limb function is greatest early after stroke but does continue to improve during the chronic phase: a two-year observational study. Physiotherapy. 2020;107(June):216–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winter JM, Crome P, Sim J, et al. Effects of mobilization and tactile stimulation on chronic upper limb sensorimotor dysfunction after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4):693–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke quality standard. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. Clinical effectiveness and evaluation unit on behalf of the intercollegiate stroke working party. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) post-acute organisational audit. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation: long term rehabilitation after stroke. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Meyns P, Bruijn S, Duysens J. The how and why of arm swing during human walking. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos P, McGuigan M, Kerwin D, et al. The role of arm movement in early trip recovery in younger and older adults. Gait Posture. 2008;27(2):352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams S, Murray C. The lived experience of older adults’ occupational adaptation following a stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(1):39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Gill T, Brauer SG. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(13):981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, et al. The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2010;90(8):1099–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner G, Packer T, Villeneuve M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2141–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley J, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Assessing therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy: literature review. NZ J Physiother. 2011;39(2):81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Changing self-efficacy in individuals following a first time stroke: preliminary study of a novel self-management intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):522–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaber-Moffett JA, Richardson PH. The influence of the physiotherapist-patient relationship on pain and disability. Physiother Theory Pract. 1997;13(1):89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Szybek K, Gard G, Lindén J. The physiotherapist-patient relationship: applying a psychotherapy model. Physiother Theory Pract. 2000;16(4):181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone WA. Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educ Res. 1993;22(4):16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(2):345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar