Patient- and proxy-perceptions on functioning after stroke rehabilitation using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0: a longitudinal cohort study

References

• Global Burden of Disease 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18(5):439–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide: 2000–2019. 2020 Dec[cited 2021 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf JA, Schepers VPM, Nijsse B, et al. The influence of psychological factors and mood on the course of participation up to four years after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;31:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rejnö Å, Nasic S, Bjälkefur K, et al. Changes in functional outcome over five years after stroke. Brain Behav. 2019; 9(6):e01300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamoon MS, Longstreth WT, Jr, Bartz TM, et al. Disability trajectories before and after stroke and myocardial infarction: the cardiovascular health study. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(12):1439–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine DA, Davydow DS, Hough CL, et al. Functional disability and cognitive impairment after hospitalization for myocardial infarction and stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(6):863–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen HJ, Kao CM, Chang KH, et al. Assessment of functioning using the WHODAS 2.0 among people with stroke in Taiwan: a 4-year follow-up study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;64(6):101442..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlind E, Persson HC, Törnbom K, et al. Return to work predicts perceived participation and autonomy by individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(25):3673–3678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, et al. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Part 1: gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years post stroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1597–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon SY, Hong SE, Kim EJ, et al. Monitoring of functioning status in subjects with chronic stroke in South Korea using WHODAS II. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(1):111–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kucukdeveci A, Kutlay S, Yildizlar D, et al. The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, et al. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(11):855–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Genev : World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Kaljonen A, Laimi K. Utility of the world health organizatioin disability assessment schedule and the world health organization minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(1):40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Kaljonen A, Laimi K. Comparing functioning in spinal cord injury and in chronic spinal pain with two ICF-based instruments: WHODAS 2.0 and WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(7):1241–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Tenovuo O, Anne K, et al. Comparing disability between traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(12):1676–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Kaljonen A, Laimi K. Disability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with traumatic brain injury using the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 and the international classification of functioning minimal generic set. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(3):224–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Tenovuo O, Kaljonen A, et al. Usability of world health organization disability assessment schedule in chronic traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(6):514–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, et al. [Internet]. Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. 2010. [cited 2021 Oct 9]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43974/9789241547598_eng.pdf;jsessionid=E7344557AC860CEAD8E3E41AC3A89FC5?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Hurme S, Laimi K. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and the WHO minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health versus conventional instruments in subacute stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):675–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves M, Lisabeth L, Williams L, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for acute stroke: rationale, methods and future directions. Stroke. 2018;49(6):1549–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SW, Chi WC, Chang KH, et al. World health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 as an objective assessment tool for predicting return to work after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(21):2592–2597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu HY, Chi WC, Chang KH, et al. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017; 53(6):856–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Koivisto M. Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale short version and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health in assessing discharge disposition after Sub-acute stroke rehabilitation. Res Rep Med. 2020;3(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. In collaboration with WHO/NIH join project. Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, et al. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2347–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Kemp A, Sunderland M, et al. Normative data for the 12 item WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0. PLOS One. 2009;4(12):e8343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(7):603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger C, Hamilton B, Linacre J, et al. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72(2):84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan J, Noonan V, Singh A, et al. Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(8):1413–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Niemi T, Hurme S, et al. Fall assessment in subacute inpatient stroke rehabilitation using clinical characteristics and the most preferred stroke severity and outcome measures. Eur J Physiother. 2021:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Niemi T, Koivisto M. Factors predicting discharge disposition after sub-acute stroke rehabilitation. Res Rep Med. 2020;3(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Niemi T, Koivisto M. Comparison of functional recovery and outcome at discharge from subacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with right or left stroke with and without contralateral spatial neglect. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(6):jrm00071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Niemi T, Koivisto M. Clinical and functional differences between right or left stroke with and without contralateral spatial neglect. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(6):jrm00072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattray J, Jones M. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16(2):234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkdahl A, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Sunnerhagen KS. How can we tell who Is aware? Where does the veracity lie? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 21(8):812–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Laimi K, Kauko T, et al. Change in agreement between stroke survivors and their significant others on the severity of restrictions of functioning in a 1-year follow-up. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(4):327–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman L, Chimatiro G. Clients with stroke and non-stroke and their guardians’ views on community reintegration status after in-patient rehabilitation. Malawi Med J. 2018;30(3):174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, et al. Long-term changes in participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(4):86–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoglund E, Westerlind E, Persson HC, et al. Self-perceived impact of stroke: a longitudinal comparison between one and five years post-stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):660–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmcrantz S, Holmqvist LW, Sommerfeld DK. Long-term health states relevant to young persons with stroke living in the community in Southern Stockholm – a study of self-rated disability and predicting factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(10):817–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzler A, Jourdan C, Josseran L, et al. Participation in work and leisure activities after stroke: a national study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62(5):351–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luengo-Fernandez R, Paul NL, Gray AM, Oxford Vascular Study, et al. Population-based study of disability and institutionalization after transient ischemic attack and stroke: 10-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study. Stroke. 2013;44(10):2854–2861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, et al. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989–1990. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1034–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadidi V, Katz-Leurer M, Carmeli E, et al. Long-term outcome poststroke: predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(11):1802–1808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Matomäki J, Laimi K. Factors associated with outcomes of inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Int J Ther Rehabil. January 2018;25(1):34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar