36
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedure

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in subjects with shoulder pain

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Received 20 Jun 2023, Accepted 09 Apr 2024, Published online: 03 May 2024

References

  • Brox JL. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: shoulder pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(1):33–56.doi:10.1016/s1521-6942(02)00101-8.
  • Pope DP, Croft PR, Pritchard CM, et al. Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(5):308–312.doi:10.1136/ard.56.5.308.
  • Hidalgo-Lozano A, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco C, et al. Muscle trigger points and pressure pain hyperalgesia in the shoulder muscles in patients with unilateral shoulder impingement: a blinded, controlled study. Exp Brain Res. 2010;202(4):915–925.doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2196-4.
  • Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):1109–1120.doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030.
  • Tesio L. Functional assessment in rehabilitative medicine: principles and methods. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(4):515–523.
  • Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(4):335–341.doi:10.1136/ard.2003.007724.
  • Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM. Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005;48(6):298–306.doi:10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.007.
  • Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(5):623–632.doi:10.1002/art.24396.
  • Stratford PW, Gill C, Westaway M, et al. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada. 1996;47(4):258–263.doi:10.3138/ptc.47.4.258.
  • Pathak A, Wilson R, Sharma S, et al. Measurement properties of the patient-specific functional scale and its current uses: an updated systematic review of 57 studies using COSMIN guidelines. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(5):262–275.doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10727.
  • Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77(8):820–829. doi:10.1093/ptj/77.8.820.
  • Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(5):331–338.doi:10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331.
  • Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(22):2459–2463.).doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe.
  • Lehtola V, Kaksonen A, Luomajoki H, et al. Content validity and responsiveness of a Finnish version of the patient-specific functional scale. Adv Physiother. 2013;15(3):134–138.doi:10.3109/21679169.2013.828243.
  • Rosengren J, Brodin N. Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the patient specific functional scale in patients treated surgically for carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(1):53–60; quiz 61.doi:10.1016/j.jht.2012.10.007.
  • Nakamaru K, Aizawa J, Koyama T, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-specific functional scale in patients with neck pain. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2816–2820.doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4236-z.
  • Yalçinkaya G, Kara B, Arda MN. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Patient-Specific functional scale in patients with chronic neck pain. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50(4):824–831.doi:10.3906/sag-1905-91.
  • Sharma S, Palanchoke J, Abbott JH. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nepali translation of the patient-specific functional scale. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(8):659–664.doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7925.
  • Thomas SJ, McDougall C, Brown ID, et al. Prevalence of symptoms and signs of shoulder problems in people with Diabetes mellitus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):748–751.doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.133.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
  • Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):128–146.
  • Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(2):179–186.doi:10.1016/s0266-7681(02)00303-0.
  • Ware J, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) conceptual frame-work and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
  • Free online SF-36 score calculator. OrthoToolKit [Internet] Available from: https://www.orthotoolkit.com/sf-36.
  • Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 health survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1025–1036.doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00094-8.
  • Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, et al. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999;83(2):157–162.doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3.
  • Mintke PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):920–926.doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
  • Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. New York: oxford University Press; 2014.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572–572.doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall Health; 2000
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
  • Nazari G, Bobos P, Lu Z, et al. Psychometric properties of patient-specific functional scale in patients with upper extremity disorders. A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;44(13):2958–2967.doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1851784.
  • Chiarotto A, Deyo RA, Terwee CB, et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(6):1127–1142.doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3892-3.
  • Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante AK. The Patient-Specific functional scale: validity in workers’ compensation claimants. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(7):1294–1299.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.040.
  • de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB. Measurement in medicine - a practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179.doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.
  • Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2011;31(29):3972–3981.doi:10.1002/sim.5466.
  • Kafa N, Kanik ZH, Karabicak GO, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient-specific functional scale in patients with low back pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;39(11):2399–2406.doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2071784.
  • Koehorst MLS, van Trijffel E, Lindeboom R. Evaluative measurement properties of the patient-specific functional scale for primary shoulder complaints in physical therapy practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(8):595–603.doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.5133.
  • Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2):56–65.doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3953.
  • De Oliveira Puga VO, Lopes AD, Shiwa SR, et al. Clinimetric testing supports the use of 5 questionnaires adapted into Brazilian portuguese for patients with shoulder disorders. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(6):404–413.doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.4441.
  • Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, et al. Validity of the patient specific functional scale in patients following upper extremity nerve injury. Hand (N Y). 2013;8(2):132–138.doi:10.1007/s11552-013-9506-9.
  • Cormack B, Stilwell P, Coninx S, et al. The biopsychosocial model is lost in translation: from misrepresentation to an enactive modernization. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;39(11):2273–2288.doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2080130.
  • Melin J, Nordin Å, Feldthusen C, et al. Goal-setting in physiotherapy: exploring a person-centered perspective. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(8):863–880.doi:10.1080/09593985.2019.1655822.
  • Pathak A, Sharma S. Clinimetrics: the patient-specific functional scale. J Physiother. 2022;69(2):126.doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2022.07.001.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.