Using action research to improve student engagement in a peer-assisted learning programme

References

• Barab, S., T. Sadler, C. Heiselt, D. Hickey, and S. Zuiker. 2007. “Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16(1): 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1999. “Peer Learning and Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24(4): 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson, eds. 2001. Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other. London. Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2006. “Aligning Assessment with Long-term Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31(4): 399–413.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, University of Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, S., and H. Fleming. 2002. “Peer Assisted Learning in an Undergraduate Hospitality Course: Second Year Students Supporting First Year Students in Group Learning.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 1(1): 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Lewes: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congos, D. H., and N. Schoeps. 1993. “Does Supplemental Instruction Really Work and What is It Anyway?” Studies in Higher Education 18(2): 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corden, R. 2001. Language and Literacy through Talk. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortright, R. N., H. L. Collins, and S. E. Di Carlo. 2005. “Peer Instruction Enhanced Meaningful Learning: Ability to Solve Novel Problems.” AJP: Advances in Physiology Education 29(2): 107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2001. Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S. C., E. Diener, A. L. Beaman, and R. T. Kelem. 1977. “Two, Three or Four Heads Are Better than One: Modification of College Performance by Peer Monitoring.” Journal of Educational Psychology 69(2): 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. A., C. P. Bithell, L. Jones, and P. Bidgood. 2010. “A First Year Experience of Student-Directed Peer-Assisted Learning.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11(3): 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, T. 2009. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Web-based Representations of Teaching in the United States: Definitions, Histories, and New Directions.” Educational Action Research 17(1): 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, K., and A. Lazenblatt. 1996. “A Peer-Tutoring Scheme to Support Independent Learning and Group Project Work in Mathematics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21(3): 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., and P. Hutchings. 2005. Advancement of Learning: Building the Teaching Commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and M. E. Kelly. 1993. Improving Teaching through Action Research. HERDSA Green Guide No. 14. Kensington, NSW: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice-Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17(3): 463–474.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2005. “Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere.” In The sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 559–603. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kench, P. L., N. Field, M. Agudera, and M. Gill. 2009. “Peer Assessment of Individual Contributions to a Group Project: Student Perceptions.” Radiography 15(2): 158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kooloos, J. G. M., T. Klaassen, M. Vereijken, S. Van Kuppeveld, S. Bolhuis, and M. Vorstenbosch. 2011. “Collaborative Group Work: Effects of Group Size and Assignment Structure on Learning Gain, Student Satisfaction and Perceived Participation.” Medical Teacher 33(12): 983–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., and P. A. Cranton. 2000. “Exploring the Scholarship of Teaching.” The Journal of Higher Education 71(4): 476–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky, R. K., and P. Gardner. 2008. “Peer Assisted Learning and Blogging: A Strategy to Promote Reflective Practice during Clinical Fieldwork.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 24(3): 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockspeiser, T. M., P. O’Sullivan, A. Teherani, and J. Muller. 2008. “Understanding the Experience of Being Taught by Peers: The Value of Social and Cognitive Congruence.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 13(3): 361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longfellow, E., S. May, L. Burke, and D. Marks-Maran. 2008. “‘They Had a Way of Helping that Actually Helped’: A Case Study of a Peer-assisted Learning Scheme..” Teaching in Higher Education 13(1): 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, J. O., and P. Nagley. 2008. “Student Project Cases: A Learner-Centred Team Activity Broadly Integrated across the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum.” Medical Teacher 30: e23–e33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestel, D., and J. Kidd. 2005. “Peer Assisted Learning in Patient-Centred Interviewing: The Impact on Student Tutors.” Medical Teacher 27(5): 439–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, L. S. 2009. Action Research in Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papinczak, T., L. Young, and M. Groves. 2007. “Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 12(2): 169–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1995. “The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology.” Change 27(6): 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Ladd, B., and C. A. Chan. 2008. “Using Action Research to Teach Students to Manage Team Learning and Improve Teamwork Satisfaction.” Active Learning in Higher Education 9(3): 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., and T. Harland. 2009. “Learning to Teach with Problem-Based Learning.” Active Learning in Higher Education 10(2): 138–153.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, T. S., E. J. Hernadez, and B. S. Adams. 2004. “‘Learning by Teaching’: A Peer-teaching Model for Diversity Training in Medical School.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 16(1): 60–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq, V. 2005. “Introduction and Evaluation of Peer-assisted Learning in First Year Undergraduate Bioscience” BEE-j 6: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol6/beej-6-3.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1996. “The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education: A Typology and Review of the Literature.” Higher Education 32(3): 321–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2005. “Trends in Peer Learning.” Educational Psychology 25(6): 623–645.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., E. Martin, J. Benjamin, and M. Prosser. 2000. “Scholarship of Teaching: A Model.” Higher Education Research & Development 19(2): 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, T. T., and G. Dall’Alba. 2007. “Students’ Experience of Peer Assessment in a Professional Course.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32(5): 541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wadoodi, A., and J. Crosby. 2002. “Twelve Tips for Peer Assisted Learning: A Classic Concept Revisited.” Medical Teacher 24(3): 241–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., C. Maher, A. Powell, and H. S. Lee. 2008. “Learning Opportunities from Group Discussions: Warrants Become the Objects of Debate.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 68(3): 247–261.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., and G. Kuh. 2004. “Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement.” Research in Higher Education 45(2): 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar