Mapping resolve in crisis bargaining through leader public statements: an examination of the United States’ statements about Bosnia and Kosovo

References

• Allen, Susan H., and Vincent, T., 2011. Bombing to bargain? The air war for Kosovo. Foreign policy analysis, 7 (1), 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, A., 2010. Where do states go? Strategy in civil war intervention. Conflict management and peace science, 27 (1), 47–66. doi:10.1177/0738894209352128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., and Hoeffler, A., 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford economic papers, 56 (4), 563–595. doi:10.1093/oep/gpf064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J.D., 1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American political science review, 577–592. doi:10.2307/2944796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J.D., 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International organisation, 49 (3), 379–414. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley, Michael G., 2013. Bargaining and the interdependent stages of civil war resolution. Journal of conflict resolution, 57 (5), 905–932. doi:10.1177/0022002712453703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, E., and Gleditsch, K.S., 2004. Why democracies may actually be less reliable allies. American journal of political science, 48 (4), 775–795. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, K.T., 1996. Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International organization, 109–139. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R.S., 1992. Game theory for applied economists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, N.P., et al. 2011. UCDP/PRIO armed conflict dataset codebook version 21.1.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, J. M., 2015. Nipping them in the bud: the onset of mediation in low-intensity civil conflicts. Journal of conflict resolution, 59 (2), 336–361. doi:10.1177/0022002713503807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., and Stewart, B.M., 2013., Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political analysis, 21 (3), 267–297. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, R., [1976] 2017. Perception and misperception in international politics: new edition. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R., Yarhi-Milo, K., and Casler, D., 2021. Redefining the debate over reputation and credibility in international security: promises and limits of new scholarship. World politics, 73 (1), 167–203. doi:10.1017/S0043887120000246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, J., 2007. Who keeps international commitments and why? The international criminal court and bilateral nonsurrender agreements. American political science review, 573–589. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertzer, J.D., 2013. Resolve in international politics. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Leeds, B.A., 1999., Domestic political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American journal of political science, 979–1002. doi:10.2307/2991814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, R.W., 2014. Fighting words: the effectiveness of statements of resolve in international conflict. Journal of peace research, 51 (6), 726–740. doi:10.1177/0022343314539826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, R.W., and Yarhi-Milo, K., 2017. The logic of “offstage” signaling: domestic politics, regime type, and major power-protégé relations. International organization, 71 (4), 701–733. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, T.C., 1990. Power, resolve and bargaining in international crises: a spatial theory. International interactions, 15 (3-4), 279–302. doi:10.1080/03050629008434734
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J.D., 1985. A continuous-outcome expected utility theory of war. Journal of conflict resolution, 29 (3), 473–502. doi:10.1177/0022002785029003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, J.D., 1989. Capabilities, uncertainty, and resolve: a limited information model of crisis bargaining. American journal of political science, 941–972. doi:10.2307/2111116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., 2023. Understanding bargaining behavior during civil war: How third-party enforcement affects groups' bargaining offers. Defence and peace economics, 34 (3), 343–59. doi:10.1080/10242694.2021.1994114
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., 2015. Power and civil war termination bargaining. International studies quarterly, 59 (1), 172–183. doi:10.1111/isqu.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redd, S.B., 2005. The influence of advisers and decision strategies on foreign policy choices: president Clinton’s decision to use force in Kosovo. International studies perspectives, 6 (1), 129–150. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00198.x
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M., 1996. Conditions of successful third-party intervention in intrastate conflicts. Journal of conflict resolution, 40 (2), 336–359. doi:10.1177/0022002796040002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M., and Aydin, A., 2006. Diplomacy and other forms of intervention in civil wars. Journal of conflict resolution, 50 (5), 736–756. doi:10.1177/0022002706291579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., et al., 2010. Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In M.W. Berry and J. Kagan (Eds.), Text mining: applications and theory. Cornwall: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, A.E., 2013. Deterrence by diplomacy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T., 1980. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, K.A., 2001. Democracy and coercive diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spaniel, W., and Savun, B., 2023. Less is more? Shifting power and third-party military assistance. Journal of conflict resolution, 00220027231202797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., 2007. Domestic audience costs in international relations: an experimental approach. International organization, 61 (4), 821–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, B.F., 2009. Bargaining failures and civil war. Annual review of political science, 12, 243–261. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.135301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, J.T., and Peters, G., 1999. The American presidency project. Santa Barbara, CA. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws.
   Google Scholar