Facilitated communication, Anna Stubblefield and disability studies

References

• American Psychological Association. 1994. Resolution on Facilitated Communication. http://www.apa.org/about/policy/chapter-11.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, D. 2015. “Facilitated Communication is a Cult That Won’t Die.” Slate Magazine, November 12. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2015/11/facilitated_communication_pseudoscience_harms_people_with_disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Behavior Analysis Association of Michigan. 2016. Resolutions and Statements by Scientific, Professional, Medical, Governmental, and Support Organizations against the Use of Facilitated Communication. http://www.baam.emich.edu/baamsciencewatch/baamfcresolutions.htm#aacap
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, J. 2012. “Facilitated Communication—What Harm It Can Do: Confessions of a Former Facilitator.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 6 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1080/17489539.2012.674680.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., and K. Nankervis. 2014. “Stolen Voices: Facilitated Communication is an Abuse of Human Rights.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 8 (3): 151–156.10.1080/17489539.2014.1001549
   Google Scholar
• Crews, W. D., E. C. Sanders, L. G. Hensley, Y. M. Johnson, S. Bonaventura, R. D. Rhodes, and M. P. Garren. 1995. “An Evaluation of Facilitated Communication in a Group of Nonverbal Individuals with Mental Retardation.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 25 (2): 205–213. doi:10.1007/bf02178505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlin, M., G. McConnachie, S. Ibel, and L. Volpe. 1993. “Facilitated Communication: A Failure to Replicate the Phenomenon.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 23 (3): 507–530. doi:10.1007/bf01046053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. R., and N. N. Singh. 1994. “Pharmacotherapy: II.” Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 6 (2): 83–86.10.1007/BF02579351
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B. 2015. “AAC Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: State of the Science and Future Research Directions.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 31 (3): 203–214.10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M. 2015. Already Doing It: Intellectual Disability and Sexual Agency. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816682973.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Green, G. 1994. “Facilitated Communication: Mental Miracle or Sleight of Hand.” Behavior and Social Issues 4 (1): 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, B., and S. Dann. 2014. “Social Media and Social Marketing in Relation to Facilitated Communication: Harnessing the Affordances of Social Media for Knowledge Translation.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 8 (4): 187–206.10.1080/17489539.2015.1023988
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, J. D., I. R. Sharp, and B. A. Gaudiano. 2002. “Separating Fact from Fiction in the Etiology and Treatment of Autism: A Scientific Review of the Evidence.” The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 1 (1): 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2014. “ISAAC Position Statement on Facilitated Communication.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 30 (4): 357–358. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.971492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson, J. W., J. A. Mulick, and A. A. Schwartz. 1995. “A History of Facilitated Communication: Science, Pseudoscience, and Antiscience Science Working Group on Facilitated Communication.” American Psychologist 50 (9): 750.10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane Roe and Richard Roe o/b/o Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Anna Stubblefield and John Does 1–10, Civil Action No. 13-1762 (SDW), ( United States District Court for the District of New Jersey 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., J. Marshall, J. T. Todd, and H. C. Shane. 2014. “The Persistence of Fad Interventions in the Face of Negative Scientific Evidence: Facilitated Communication for Autism as a Case Example.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 8 (2): 62–101.10.1080/17489539.2014.976332
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. 2014. “Comments and a Personal Reflection on the Persistence of Facilitated Communication.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 8 (2): 102–110. doi:10.1080/17489539.2014.997427.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, M. P. 2001. “Facilitated Communication since 1995: A Review of Published Studies.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31 (3): 287–313. doi:10.1023/a:1010795219886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert, M. P. 2012. “Facilitated Communication: The Empirical Imperative to Prevent Further Professional Malpractice.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 6 (1): 18–27. doi:10.1080/17489539.2012.693840.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, M. P. 2015. “EBP Speakers Corner: A Revised Imperative for Curbing the Lie of Facilitated Communication.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 9 (2): 82–90.10.1080/17489539.2015.1066560
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. A. 2016. Press Release 15 January 2016: Former Chairwoman of Rutgers Philosophy Department Sentenced to 12 Years. Newark, NJ: Essex County Prosecutors Office.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, P. 2005. “‘Communication Unbound-or Unfound’?-An Integrative Review on the Effectiveness of Facilitated Communication (FC) in Non-Verbal Persons with Autism and Mental Retardation.” Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Psychiatrie Und Psychotherapie 53 (2): 93–128.
   Google Scholar
• Riggott, J. 2005. “Pseudoscience in Autism Treatment: Are the News and Entertainment Media Helping or Hurting?” Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 4 (1): 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Saloviita, T., M. Leppänen, and U. Ojalammi. 2014. “Authorship in Facilitated Communication: An Analysis of 11 Cases.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 30 (3): 213–225.10.3109/07434618.2014.927529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., S. Balandin, B. Hemsley, T. Iacono, P. Probst, and S. von Tetzchner. 2014. “Facilitated Communication and Authorship: A Systematic Review.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 30 (4): 359–368.10.3109/07434618.2014.971490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. 2010. Disability Hate Crimes: Does Anyone Really Hate Disabled People?. Surrey, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, G. H., R. H. Horner, G. Dunlap, and M. Wang. 2014. “Standards of Proof TASH, Facilitated Communication, and the Science-Based Practices Movement.” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 39 (3): 178–188.10.1177/1540796914558831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubblefield, A. 2015, 26 December. Letter to Superior Court Judge Siobhan Teare. http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2016/01/in_jailhouse_letter_professor_convicted_of_sex_ass.html
   Google Scholar
• Tetzchner, S. V. 1996. “Facilitated, Automatic and False Communication: Current Issues in the Use of Facilitating Techniques.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 11 (2): 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J. T. 2012. “The Moral Obligation to Be Empirical: Comments on Boynton’s ‘Facilitated Communication—What Harm It Can Do: Confessions of a Former Facilitator’.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 6 (1): 36–57.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J. T. 2015. “Old Horses in New Stables.” Controversial Therapies for Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Fad, Fashion, and Science in Professional Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, J. C., M. J. Tincani, and R. Lang. 2014. “Facilitated Communication Denies People with Disabilities Their Voice.” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 39 (3): 195–202.10.1177/1540796914556778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. 2015, 14 October. The Racialized Reception of the Verdict in the Trial of Anna Stubblefield. http://philosophycommons.typepad.com/disability_and_disadvanta/2015/10/the-racialized-reception-of-the-verdict-in-the-trial-of-anna-stubblefield.html
   Google Scholar
• Trembath, D., J. Paynter, D. Keen, and U. K. H. Ecker. 2015. “‘Attention: Myth Follows!’ Facilitated Communication, Parent and Professional Attitudes towards Evidence-Based Practice, and the Power of Misinformation.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 9 (3): 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., V. A. Fuller, and B. Sparrow. 2003. “Clever Hands: Uncontrolled Intelligence in Facilitated Communication.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (1): 5.10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. L., J. W. Jacobson, R. A. Paglieri, and A. A. Schwartz. 1993. “An Experimental Assessment of Facilitated Communication.” Mental Retardation 31 (1): 49–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wichert, B. 2015a, 20 August. Controversial Technique At Center Of Professor’s Sex Assault Trial. http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2015/08/controversial_technique_at_center_of_professors_se.html
   Google Scholar
• Wichert, B. 2015b, 17 September. Professor Accused Of Bruising Disabled Man during Sex Assault. http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2015/09/professor_accused_of_causing_abrasions_on_disabled.html
   Google Scholar
• Wombles, K. 2014. “Some Fads Never Die—They Only Hide behind Other Names: Facilitated Communication is Not and Never Will Be Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 8 (4): 181–186.10.1080/17489539.2015.1012780
   Google Scholar
• Ziring, P. R., D. Brazdziunas, W. C. Cooley, T. A. Kastner, M. E. Kummer, L. G. De Pijem, R. D. Quint, et al. 1998. “Auditory Integration Training and Facilitated Communication for Autism.” Pediatrics, 102 (2 I), 431–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar