The creation of cyborgs within a socially constructed understanding of disability and assistive activity technology use

References

• Bergem, Svein. 2019. “Knowledge among Important Actors in the Field of Adaptive Equipment for Young People with Disabilities.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 15 (1): 109–118. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1538393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigonnesse, Catherine, Atiya Mahmood, Habib Chaudhury, W. Ben Mortenson, William C. Miller, and Kathleen A. Martin Ginis. 2018. “The Role of Neighborhood Physical Environment on Mobility and Social Participation among People Using Mobility Assistive Technology.” Disability & Society 33 (6): 866–893. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1453783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, Johan, and Per-Olof Östergren. 2015. “Users’ Perspectives on the Provision of Assistive Technologies in Bangladesh: Awareness, Providers, Costs and Barriers.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 10 (4): 301–308. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.974221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, Vivien. 2015. Social Constructionism. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Dianna D., Elizabeth A. Courtney-Long, Alissa C. Stevens, Michelle L. Sloan, Carolyn Lullo, Susanna N. Visser, Michael H. Fox, et al. 2014. “Vital Signs: Disability and Physical Activity—United States, 2009–2012.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 63 (18): 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, J., A. Ganus, J. M. Ivey, T. Plummer, and A. Eubank. 2016. “The Impact of Mobility Assistive Technology Devices on Participation for Individuals with Disabilities.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 11 (6): 468–477. doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1027295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté-Leclerc, Félix, Gabrielle Boileau Duchesne, Patrick Bolduc, Amélie Gélinas-Lafrenière, Corinne Santerre, Johanne Desrosiers, and Mélanie Levasseur. 2017. “How Does Playing Adapted Sports Affect Quality of Life of People with Mobility Limitations? Results from a Mixed-Method Sequential Explanatory Study.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 15 (1): 22. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0597-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federici, Stefano, and Simone Borsci. 2016. “Providing Assistive Technology in Italy: The Perceived Delivery Process Quality as Affecting Abandonment.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 11 (1): 22–31. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.930191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Barbara E. 2016. Rehabilitation: A Post-Critical Approach, Rehabilitation Science in Practice Series. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Barbara E., Franco A. Carnevale, and Gillian King. 2012. “This is My Way”: Reimagining Disability, in/Dependence and Interconnectedness of Persons and Assistive Technologies.” Disability and Rehabilitation 34 (22): 1894–1899. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.670040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjessing, Berit, Reidun Birgitta Jahnsen, Liv Inger Strand, and Eli Natvik. 2017. “Adaptation for Participation! Children’s Experiences with Use of Assistive Devices in Activities.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 13 (8): 803-808.
   Google Scholar
• Grue, Jan. 2014. Kroppsspråk: Fremstillinger av funksjonshemming i kultur og samfunn [Body Language: Disability in Culture and Community]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Grue, Jan. 2016a. “The Social Meaning of Disability: A Reflection on Categorisation, Stigma and Identity.” Sociology of Health & Illness 38 (6): 957–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grue, Lars. 2016b. Normalitet. Bergen: Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• Grönvik, Lars. 2007. Definitions of Disability in Social Sciences: Methodological Perspectives. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, Karen Whalley. 2009. “Sacred Texts: A Sceptical Exploration of the Assumptions Underpinning Theories of Occupation.” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 76 (1): 6–13. doi:10.1177/000841740907600105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hangaard Rasmussen, Torben. 1996. Kroppens filosof: Maurice Merleau-Ponty [The Philosopher of the Body: Maurice Merleau-Ponty]. Brøndby: Semi-forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2006. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In J. Weiss, J.W. Hunsinger, J. Nolan & P.P. Trifonas (ed.) The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, 117–158. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelle, Kari Margrete, and Kjersti Vik. 2011. “The Ups and Downs of Social Participation: Experiences of Wheelchair Users in Norway.” Disability and Rehabilitation 33 (25–26): 2479–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggblom Kronlöf, Greta. 2007. Participation in Everyday Life. Very Old Persons’ Experiences of Daily Occupation, Occupation of Interest and Use of Assistive Devices: Inst of Medicine. Göteborg: Department of Public Health and Community Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama, M. 2003a. “Toward Culturally Relevant Epistemologies in Occupational Therapy.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 57 (5): 582–588. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.5.582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwama, Michael K., Nicole A. Thomson, and Rona M. Macdonald. 2009. “The Kawa Model: The Power of Culturally Responsive Occupational Therapy.” Disability and Rehabilitation 31 (14): 1125–1135. doi:10.1080/09638280902773711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwama, Michael. 2003b. “Toward Culturally Relevant Epistemologies in Occupational Therapy.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 57 (5): 582–588. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.5.582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissow, Anne-Merete, and John Singhammer. 2012. “Participation in Physical Activities and Everyday Life of People with Disabilities.” European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 5 (2): 65–81. doi:10.5507/euj.2012.009.
   Google Scholar
• Krantz, Oskar. 2012. “Assistive Devices Utilisation in Activities of Everyday Life–a Proposed Framework of Understanding a User Perspective.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 7 (3): 189–198. doi:10.3109/17483107.2011.618212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lie, Merete, and Knut Holtan Sørensen. 1996. Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magasi, Susan, Alex Wong, David B. Gray, Joy Hammel, Carolyn Baum, Chia-Chiang Wang, and Allen W. Heinemann. 2015. “Theoretical Foundations for the Measurement of Environmental Factors and Their Impact on Participation among People with Disabilities.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 96 (4): 569–577. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, Kristin. 2003. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning. 2 utg [Qualitative Methods in Medical Research. 2nd Edition]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis, K. A., A. Papathomas, M. J. Perrier, and B. Smith. 2017. “Psychosocial Factors Associated with Physical Activity in Ambulatory and Manual Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study.” Disability and Rehabilitation 39 (2): 187–192. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1045991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis, Kathleen A., Jasmin K. Ma, Amy E. Latimer-Cheung, and James H. Rimmer. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Review Articles Addressing Factors Related to Physical Activity Participation among Children and Adults with Physical Disabilities.” Health Psychology Review 10 (4): 478–494. doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1198240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert, Sveinung Vaage, and Kari Marie Thorbjørnsen. 1998. Å ta Andres Perspektiv. Oslo: Abstrakt forl.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1994. Kroppens fenomenologi [The Phenomenology of the Body], Phénoménologie De La Perception. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• NAV. 2015. Rundskriv til § 10-7 bokstav a - Aktivitetshjelpemidler til personer over 26 år [Circular to § 10-7 Letter a - Assistive Activity Technology for Persons over 26 Years of Age.]. NAV [Norwegian Labour and Welfare Organization]. https://lovdata.no/nav/rundskriv/r10-07a.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, Nils Erik. 2011. Hjelpemidler og tilrettelegging for deltakelse: et kunnskapsbasert grunnlag [Assistive Technology Fascilitating for Participation: On a Knowledge-Basis]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, T. Louise-Bender, J. Kim, and B. Weiner. 2002. “The Shaping of Individual Meanings Assigned to Assistive Technology: A Review of Personal Factors.” Disability and Rehabilitation 24 (1-3): 5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., P. S. Kermit, and S. Soderstrom. 2021. “You Have to Argue the Right Way”: User Involvement in the Service Delivery Process for Assistive Activity Technology.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 16 (8): 840–850. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1741702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., S. Söderström, and P. S. Kermit. 2019a. ““The Fact That I Can Be in Front of Others, I Am Used to Being a Bit Behind”: How Assistive Activity Technology Affects Participation in Everyday Life.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 16 (1): 83–91. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1642391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen, Heidi, Sylvia Söderström, and P. S. Kermit. 2019b. “Assistive Activity Technology as Symbolic Expressions of the Self.” Technology and Disability 31 (3): 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ravneberg, Bodil, and Sylvia Söderström. 2017. Disability, Society and Assistive Technology, Interdisciplinary Disability Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravneberg, Bodil. 2009. “Identity Politics by Design: Users, Markets and the Public Service Provision for Assistive Technology in Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 11 (2): 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ravneberg, Bodil. 2012. “Usability and Abandonment of Assistive Technology.” Journal of Assistive Technologies 6 (4): 259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2006. “Towards a Psychology of Disability: The Emotional Effects of Living in a Disabling Society.” In Disability & Psychology: Critical Introductions & Reflections, edited by D. Goodley and R. Lawthom. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, Donna. 2012. “Cyborgs, Cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the Contribution of Haraway to Disability Studies.” In: Goodley, D., Hughes, B., Davis, L. (eds) Disability and Social Theory, 91–111. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023001_6.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat, Jacquie, and Roberta Woodgate. 2011. “The Intersection of Culture, Disability and Assistive Technology.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 6 (2): 87–96. ­doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.507859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer, Marcia J., and Rob Glueckauf. 2005. “Assessing the Benefits of Assistive Technologies for Activities and Participation.” Rehabilitation Psychology 50 (2): 132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, Marcia J., Caren Sax, Alan Vanbiervliet, Laura A. Cushman, and John V. Scherer. 2005. “Predictors of Assistive Technology Use: The Importance of Personal and Psychosocial Factors.” Disability and Rehabilitation 27 (21): 1321–1331. doi:10.1080/09638280500164800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, Marcia J., Ger Craddock, and Trish Mackeogh. 2011. “The Relationship of Personal Factors and Subjective Well-Being to the Use of Assistive Technology Devices.” Disability and Rehabilitation 33 (10): 811–817. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, W. 2005. “ICTs and Disability: Exploring the Human Dimensions of Technological Engagement.” Technology & Disability 17 (4): 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara, Kristen, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. “Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology.” ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8 (2): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, Roger, Eric Hirsch, and D. Morley. 1992. “Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Technology of the Household.” In Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, edited by Roger Silverstone and Eric Hirsch. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, Tomas M. 2015. Vitenskap, teknologi og samfunn [Science, Technology and Society]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseng, Frode, Jacques Forest, and Thomas Curran. 2015. “Positive Emotions in Recreational Sport Activities: The Role of Passion and Belongingness.” Journal of Happiness Studies 16 (5): 1117–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz, Leslie, and Brian Watermeyer. 2008. “Cyborg Anxiety: Oscar Pistorius and the Boundaries of What It Means to Be Human.” Disability & Society 23 (2): 187–190. doi:10.1080/09687590701841232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Knut H. 1996. “Learning Technology, Constructing Culture. Socio-Technical Change as Social Learning.” STS-Arbeidsnotat 18: 96.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Knut H. 2006. “Domestication: The Enactment of Technology.” In Domestication of Media and Technology, redigert av Thomas Berker, Maren Hartmann, Yves Punie, og Katie Ward, 40–61. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 2004. “Disability and Impairment.” In Disabling Barriers - Enabling Environments, edited by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tjora, Aksel Hagen. 2019. Qualitative Research as Stepwise-Deductive Induction. Vol. 26, Routledge advances in research methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tjora, Aksel. 2017. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis [Qualitative Research Methods in Practice]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Tøssebro, Jan. 2010. Hva er funksjonshemming. Vol. 36, Hva er. Oslo: Universitetsforl.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY Geneva: World health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wyer, Mary. 2001. Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zelenka, Tomáš, Martin Kudláček, and Julie Wittmannová. 2018. “Quality of Life of Wheelchair Rugby Players.” European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 10 (2): 31–35.
   Google Scholar