Paying people who use illicit substances or ‘peers’ participating in community-based work: a narrative review of the literature

References

• Ballan, R., & White, C. (2010). Harm reduction at work: A guide for organizations employing PWUD. Open Society Foundations. Retrieved from: www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/harm-reduction-work
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, P. J., Casey, R., O’Hagan, F. T., & Vienneau, P. (2016). Poverty status of worker compensation claimants with permanent impairments. Critical Public Health, 26(2), 173–190. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1010485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder, A. W., Cockerham-Colas, L., Peyser, D., Reynoso, S. P., Soloway, I., & Litwin, A. H. (2017). Perceived benefits of the hepatitis C peer educators: A qualitative investigation. Harm Reduction Journal, 14, 67. doi:10.1186/s12954-017-0192-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, K., & Salmon, A. (2011). What women who use drugs have to say about ethical research: Findings of an exploratory qualitative study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 6, 84–98. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belle-Isle, L. (2016). At the table with PWUD: Transforming power inequities (Thesis). Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uvic.ca//handle/1828/7199
   Google Scholar
• Belle-Isle, L., Pauly, B., Hall, B., Lacroix, K., LeBanc, S., Sproule, R., …., Dupuis, G. (2016). From one ally to another: Practice guidelines to better include PWUD at your decision-making tables (Bulletin). Victoria, BC: Center for Addictions Research of BC (CARBC).
   Google Scholar
• Black, K. Z., Hardy, C. Y., De Marco, M., Ammerman, A. S., Corbie-Smith, G., Council, B., … Lightfoot, A. (2013). Beyond incentives for involvement to compensation for consultants: Increasing equity in CBPR approaches. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 7, 263–270. doi:10.1353/cpr.2013.0040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 255–270. doi:10.1002/1099-1298(200007/08)10:4<255::AID-CASP582>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Aids Society. (2015). Peerology: A guide by and for PWUD on how to get involved. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Aids Society. Retrieved from http://librarypdf.catie.ca/pdf/ATI-20000s/26521E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. (2006). “Nothing About Us Without Us” greater, meaningful involvement of people who use illegal drugs: A public health, ethical, and human rights imperative. Retrieved from http://www.aidslaw.ca/site/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Greater+Involvement+-+Bklt+-+Drug+Policy+-+ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardona, D. M., & Joshi, R. (2007). The challenge of balancing methodological research rigour and practical needs in low-income settings: What we are doing and what we need to do better. Critical Public Health, 17, 81–89. doi:10.1080/09581590601045238
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, R., & Smith, C. (2009). Engaging people with lived experience for better health outcomes: Collaboration with mental health and addiction service users in research, policy and treatment. Ministers Advisory Group. Retrieved from http://canadianharmreduction.com/sites/default/files/Engaging%20PWLE%20-%20July%207%202009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Closson, K., McNeil, R., McDougall, P., Fernando, S., Collins, A. B., Baltzer Turje, R., … Parashar, S. (2016). Meaningful engagement of people living with HIV who use drugs: Methodology for the design of a Peer Research Associate (PRA) hiring model. Harm Reduction Journal, 13, 1–7. doi:10.1186/s12954-016-0116-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Strike, C., Guta, A., Baltzer Turje, R., McDougall, P., Parashar, S., & McNeil, R. (2017). “We’re giving you something so we get something in return”: Perspectives on research participation and compensation among people living with HIV who use drugs. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 39, 92–98. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. A., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update, 11, 103–104. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon, W., Callon, C., Wiebe, L., Small, W., Kerr, T., & McNeil, R. (2017). Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of PWUD on their experiences as peer researchers. Social Science & Medicine, 176, 85–92. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, P., & Page, K. (2012). Research participation as work: Comparing the perspectives of researchers and economically marginalized populations. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 1254–1259. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J. P., Back, S. E., Waldrop, A. E., Jenkins, L., & Brady, K. T. (2008). The influence of monetary compensation on relapse among addicted participants: Empirical vs. anecdotal evidence. The American Journal on Addictions, 17, 488–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550490802408423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, P. (1996). On suffering and structural violence: A view from below. Daedalus, 3, 261–283.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., Croft, J. R., Dugosh, K. L., Mastro, N. K., Lee, P. A., … Patapis, N. S. (2005). Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 78, 275–281. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, C., & Dwyer, R. (2001). For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction, 96, 1319–1325. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.969131911.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, C., Hall, W., Ritter, A., & Jenkinson, R. (2006). The ethics of paying drug users who participate in research: A review and practical recommendations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 1, 21–36. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.4.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of British Columbia. (n.d). Earning exemptions Retrieved from https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/family-social-supports/income-assistance/on-assistance
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. N., Johnson, R., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5, 101–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, A., & Buxton, J. (2018). A guide for paying peer research assistants: Challenges and opportunities. Vancouver, BC: BC Centre for Disease Control. Retrieved from http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Educational%20Materials/Epid/Other/peer_PEEP_payment_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greer, A., Luchenski, S. A., Amlani, A. A., Lacroix, K., Burmeister, C., & Buxton, J. A. (2016). Peer engagement in harm reduction strategies and services: A critical case study and evaluation framework from British Columbia, Canada. BMC Public Health, 16, 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3136-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guta, A., Flicker, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Governing through community allegiance: A qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health, 23, 432–451. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.761675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guta, A., Flicker, S., Travers, R. S., John, A., Worthington, C., Bungay, V., & Greene, S. (2014). HIV CBR ethics fact sheet #8: Supporting peer research assistants (PRAs) (improving the accessibility of research ethics boards for HIV community-based research in Canada). Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.hivethicscbr.com/documents/HIVCBREthics_FactSheet08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guta, A., Flicker, S., Travers, R., Switzer, S., Bungay, V., Husbands, W., …., Worthington, C. (2014). HIV CBR ethics fact sheet #1: Ethical issues related to compensation. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.hivethicscbr.com/documents/HIVCBREthics_FactSheet01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, K., Fairbairn, N., Suwannawong, P., Kaplan, K., Wood, E., & Kerr, T. (2012). Collective empowerment while creating knowledge: A description of a community-based participatory research project with drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 502–510. doi:10.3109/10826084.2012.644110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Income Treatment and Exemptions. (2016). Retrieved from http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/policies-for-government/bcea-policy-and-procedure-manual/eligibility/income-treatment-and-exemptions
   Google Scholar
• International HIV/AIDS Alliance. (2015). Good practice guide for employing people who use drugs. Retrieved from https://www.aidsalliance.org/assets/000/001/840/Employing_FINAL_original.pdf?1445009816
   Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. (2010). Payment for involvement: A guide for making payments to members of the public actively involved in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh. Retrieved from http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/documents/INVOLVEPayment%20Guiderev2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jain, B., Krishnan, S., Ramesh, S., Sabarwal, S., Garg, V., & Dhingra, N. (2014). Effect of peer-led outreach activities on injecting risk behavior among male drug users in Haryana, India. Harm Reduction Journal, 11, 3. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-11-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Seear, K., Treloar, C., & Ritter, A. (2017). The productive techniques and constitutive effects of “evidence-based policy” and “consumer participation” discourses in health policy processes. Social Science & Medicine, 176, 60–68. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Ritter, A., & Stafford, J. (2013). Public opinion and drug policy in Australia: Engaging the “affected community.” Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 60–66. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00497.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, L., Shaw, A., LeBlanc, S., Martin, A., Marshall, Z., Weersink, K., … Tyndall, M. W. (2014). Establishing a community-based participatory research partnership among PWUD in Ottawa: the PROUD cohort study. Harm Reduction Journal, 11, 26. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-11-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. (2013). The stigmatization of problem drug users: A narrative literature review. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 20, 85–95. doi:10.3109/09687637.2012.743506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLellan, J., Surey, J., Abubakar, I., Stagg, H. R., & Mannell, J. (2017). Using peer advocates to improve access to services among hard-to-reach populations with hepatitis C: A qualitative study of client and provider relationships. Harm Reduction Journal, 14, 76. doi:10.1186/s12954-017-0202-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, A. R., Hill, R. C., Myers, L. A., & Street, A. D. (2008). Establishing the economics of engaging communities in health promotion: What is desirable, what is feasible? Critical Public Health, 18, 285–297. doi:10.1080/09581590802277366
   Google Scholar
• McKeganey, N. (2001). To pay or not to pay: Respondents’ motivation for participating in research. Addiction, 96, 1237–1238. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96912371.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. D., Andrews, J. O., Magwood, G. S., Jenkins, C., Cox, M. J., & Williamson, D. C. (2011). Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: A synthesis of best processes. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8(3), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103575/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oransky, M., Fisher, C.B., Mahadevan, M., & Singer, M. (2009). Barriers and opportunities for recruitment for nonintervention studies on HIV risk: Perspectives of street drug users. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 1642–1659. doi:10.1080/10826080802543671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacific Aids Network. (2014). Compensating peer researchers. Retrieved from http://pacificaidsnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CBR-Tips-Compensating-Peer-Researchers-Pacific-AIDS-Network-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, B. (2014). Homelessness, stigma, and health. In W. Cockerham, R. Dingwall, & S. Quah (Eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society (pp. 1185–1188). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Peer Support Resource Manual. (2001). British Columbia. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2001/MHA_Peer_Support_Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pigeon Park Savings. (2016). Pigeon Park Savings. Retrieved from https://www.phs.ca/index.php/project/pigeon-park-savings/
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, M., & Smith, A. (2007). Researching the margins: Strategies for ethical and rigorous research with marginalised communities. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, E., & Jones, S. (2009). Hand to mouth: The impact of poverty and financial exclusion on adults with multiple needs. London, UK: Revolving Doors Agency. Retrieved from http://www.friendsprovidentfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Revolving_Doors_Hand_to_Mouth_-_Full_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Quesada, J., Hart, L. K., & Bourgois, P. (2011). Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant laborers in the United States. Medical Anthropology, 30, 339–362. doi:10.1080/01459740.2011.576725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., Wagner, K., Strathdee, S.A., Shannon, K., Davidson, P., & Bourgois, P. (2012). Structural violence and structural vulnerability within the risk environment: Theoretical and methodological perspectives for a social epidemiology of HIV risk among injection drug users and sex workers. In P. O’Campo & J. Dunn (Eds.). Rethinking social epidemiology (pp. 205–230). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-2138-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, A. J., Fry, C. L., & Swan, A. (2003). The ethics of reimbursing injecting drug users for public health research interviews: What price are we prepared to pay? International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 1–3. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00094-4
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, A., Lancaster, K., & Diprose, R. (2018). Improving drug policy: The potential of broader democratic participation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 55, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room, R. (2014). Legalizing a market for cannabis for pleasure: Colorado, Washington, Uruguay and beyond. Addiction, 109, 345–351. doi:10.1111/add.12355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, A., Browne, A. J., & Pederson, A. (2010). ‘Now we call it research’: Participatory health research involving marginalized women who use drugs. Nursing Inquiry, 17, 336–345. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00507.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Recovery Network. (2009). Experts by experience: Guidelines to support the development of peer worker roles in the mental health sector. Scotland, UK: Scottish Recovery Network. Retrieved from https://scottishrecovery.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/srn_exe_form.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, T. (2005). Paying drug users to take part in research: Justice, human rights and business perspectives on the use of incentive payments. Addiction Research & Theory, 13, 101–109. doi:10.1080/16066350512331328122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomka, J., McCurdy, S., Ratliff, E. A., Timpson, S., & Williams, M. L. (2007). Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1403–1409. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0319-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz, A., & Colvin, C. (2014). ‘It’s in our veins’: caring natures and material motivations of community health workers in contexts of economic marginalisation. Critical Public Health, 2, 139–152. doi:10.1080/09581596.2014.941281
   Google Scholar
• Ti, L., Tzemis, D., & Buxton, J.A. (2012). Engaging PWUD in policy and program development: A review of the literature. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 7, 47. doi:10.1186/1747-597X-7-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., Rance, J., Dore, G. J., & Grebely, J., & ETHOS Study Group. (2014). Barriers and facilitators for assessment and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in the opioid substitution treatment setting: Insights from the ETHOS study. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 21, 560–567. doi:10.1111/jvh.12183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., Fraser, S., & Valentine, K. (2007). Valuing methadone takeaway doses: The contribution of service-user perspectives to policy and practice. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 14, 61–74. doi:10.1080/09687630600997527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., Rance, J., Madden, A., & Liebelt, L. (2011). Evaluation of consumer participation demonstration projects in five Australian drug user treatment facilities: The impact of individual versus organizational stability in determining project progress. Substance Use & Misuse, 46, 969–979. doi:10.3109/10826084.2010.540289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, C., & Raine, P. (2001). Involving users in evaluation: The social relations of user participation in health research. Critical Public Health, 11, 215–229. doi:10.1080/09581590110066667
   Google Scholar
• Tsai Roussos, S., & Fawcett, S.B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancouver Coastal Health. (2016). Peer framework for health-focused peer positions in the Downtown Eastside. Canada. Retrieved from http://dtes.vch.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/06/VCH_DTES_Peer_Framework_FINAL_DIGITAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandrey, R., Bigelow, G. E., & Stitzer, M. L. (2007). Contingency management in cocaine abusers: a dose-effect comparison of goods-based versus cash-based incentives. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 338–343. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.15.4.338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, A., & Quilgars, D. (2005). Homelessness and financial exclusion: A literature review. University of York Centre for Housing Policy. Retrieved from http://www.friendsprovidentfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Centre_for_Housing_Policy_University_of_York_-_Full_Report1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2000). Mental health and work: Impact, issues and good practices. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/712.pdf
   Google Scholar