Advanced search
Publication Cover
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Volume 28, 2021 - Issue 1: Preparing for Admission Tests in English for Higher Education
Submit an article Journal homepage
476
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revising the BioMedical Admissions Test (BMAT) to improve impact and washback for candidates and support fair access to test preparation

Sarah McElweea Cambridge Assessment Admissions Testing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;b Cambridge Assessment English, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-8249View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Kevin Y.F. Cheunga Cambridge Assessment Admissions Testing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;b Cambridge Assessment English, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9548-2932View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Stephen R.T. Cromiea Cambridge Assessment Admissions Testing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKView further author information
,
Mark Shannona Cambridge Assessment Admissions Testing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKView further author information
&
Tom Gallachera Cambridge Assessment Admissions Testing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;b Cambridge Assessment English, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-5327View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 77-95 | Received 01 Mar 2017, Accepted 26 Jun 2019, Published online: 22 Jul 2019

References

  • Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: National Council on Measurement in Education.
  • Andrews, S. J. (2004). Washback and curriculum innovation. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanbe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 37–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Atkinson, R. C., & Geiser, S. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 665–676.
  • British Medical Association. (2009). Equality and diversity in UK medical schools. London: Author.
  • Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing. Studies in Language Testing 21. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • Cheung, K. Y. F., & McElwee, S. (2017). What skills are we assessing? Cognitive validity in BMAT. In K. Y. F. Cheung, S. McElwee, & J. Emery Eds., Applying the socio-cognitive framework to the biomedical admissions test: Insights from language assessment Studies in Language Testing 49 (pp. 35–80). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • Cheung, K. Y. F., McElwee, S., & Emery, J., (Eds.). (2017). Applying the socio-cognitive framework to the biomedical admissions test: Insights from language assessment Studies in Language Testing 45. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • Cleland, J. A., French, F. H., & Johnston, P. W. (2011). A mixed-methods study identifying and exploring medical students’ views of the UKCAT. Medical Teacher, 33(3), 244–249.
  • Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Ginsburg, S., & Hatala, R. (2015). A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane’s framework. Medical Education, 49(6), 560–575.
  • El Masri, Y., Baird, J., & Graesser, A. (2016). Language effects in international testing. The case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 427–455.
  • Emery, J. L. (2010). An investigation into candidates’ preparation for the BioMedical Admissions Test (2007 session): A replication involving all institutions. Internal Admissions Testing Service report, unpublished.
  • Emery, J. L., & Bell, J. F. (2009). The predictive validity of the biomedical admissions test for pre-clinical examination performance. Medical Education, 43(6), 557–564.
  • Emery, J. L., Bell, J. F., & Vidal Rodeiro, C. L. (2011). The biomedical admissions test for medical student selection: Issues of fairness and bias. Medical Teacher, 33(1), 62–71.
  • Fisher, A. (2005). Thinking skills and admission to higher education. Unpublished internal report. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL.
  • Gallacher, T., McElwee, S., & Cheung, K. Y. F. (2017). BMAT 2015 test preparation survey report. Internal Cambridge Assessment report, unpublished.
  • Green, A. (2007a). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Studies in Language Testing 25. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • Green, A. (2007b). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre‐sessional language courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 75–97.
  • Gu, X., & Saville, N. (2016). Twenty years of Cambridge English examinations in China: Investigating impact from the test-takers’ perspectives. In G. Yu & Y. Jin (Eds.), Assessing Chinese learners of English: Language constructs, consequences and conundrums (pp. 287–310). London: Palgrave.
  • Hawkey, R. (2011). Consequential validity. In L. Taylor Ed., Examining speaking: Research and practice in assessing second language speaking Studies in Language Testing 30 (pp. 273–302). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport: Praeger.
  • Kelly, M. E., Gallagher, N., Dunne, F. P., & Murphy, A. W. (2014). Views of doctors of varying disciplines on HPAT-Ireland as a selection tool for medicine. Medical Teacher, 36(9), 775–782.
  • Kelly, M. E., Regan, D., Dunne, F., Henn, P., Newell, J., & O’Flynn, S. (2013). To what extent does the health professions admission test-Ireland predict performance in early undergraduate tests of communication and clinical skills? – An observational cohort study. BMC Medical Education, 13, 68.
  • Lambe, P., Waters, C., & Bristow, D. (2012). The UK Clinical Aptitude Test: Is it a fair test for selecting medical students? Medical Teacher, 34(8), 557–565.
  • Linn, R. L. (2009). Comments on Atkinson and Geiser: Considerations for college admissions testing. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 677–679.
  • McElwee, S., Fyfe, M., & Grant, K. (2017). The consequences of biomedical admissions testing on individuals, institutions and society. In K. Y. F. Cheung, S. McElwee, & J. Emery Eds., Applying the socio-cognitive framework to the biomedical admissions test: Insights from language assessment Studies in Language Testing 49 (pp. 181–215). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • McManus, I. C., Dewberry, C., Nicholson, S., & Dowell, J. S. (2013). The UKCAT-12 study: Educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools. BMC Medicine, 11(244).
  • Medical Schools Council. (2014). Selecting for excellence final report. London: Author.
  • Messick, S. (1989a). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
  • Messick, S. (1989b). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of Assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11.
  • Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.
  • Milburn, A. (2012). Fair access to professional careers: A progress report by the independent reviewer on social mobility and child poverty. London: Cabinet Office.
  • Newton, P., & Shaw, S. D. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. London: Sage.
  • Qi, L. (2007). Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high‐stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 51–74.
  • Saville, N. (2012). Applying a model for investigating the impact of language assessment within educational contexts: The Cambridge ESOL approach. Research Notes, 50, 4–8.
  • Saville, N., & Hawkey, R. (2004). The IELTS impact study: Investigating washback on teaching materials. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: research context and methods (pp. 73–96). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shohamy, E. (2007). Language tests as language policy tools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1, 117–130.
  • Soares, J. A. (2012). The future of college admissions: Discussion. Educational Psychologist, 47(1), 66–70.
  • Stevens, L., Kelly, M. E., Hennessy, M., Last, J., Dunne, F., & O’Flynn, S. (2014). Medical students’ views on selection tools for Medical School – A mixed methods study. Irish Medical Journal, 107(8), 229–231.
  • Tiffin, P. A., Dowell, J. S., & McLachlan, J. C. (2012). Widening access to UK medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: Modelling the impact of the UKCAT in the 2009 cohort. BMJ, 344, e1805.
  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Weir, C. J. (2013). An overview of the influences on English language testing in the United Kingdom. In C. J. Weir, I. Vidaković, & E. D. Galaczi Eds., Measured constructs: A History of Cambridge English language examinations 1913–2012 Studies in Language Testing 37 (pp. 1–102). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
  • Yu, G., & Jin, Y. (2016). Assessing Chinese learners of English: Language constructs, consequences and conundrums – An introduction. In G. Yu & Y. Jin (Eds.), Assessing Chinese learners of English: Language constructs, consequences and conundrums (pp. 1–16). London: Palgrave.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.