Benefits of Group Learning As a Collaborative Strategy in a Diverse Higher Education Context

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science 1989. Science for All Americans Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell CC, Eison JA 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby J, Harden RM 2000. AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer- the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4): 334–347. doi: 10.1080/014215900409429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen VP 2000. Task structuring for on-line problem based learning: A case study. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3): 329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg P 1999. What do We Mean by Collaborative Learning. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Grow GO 1991. Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3): 125–149. doi: 10.1177/0001848191041003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT 2009. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5): 365–379. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09339057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman D, Felder R, Fuller H 2000. Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2): 133–140. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00507.x
   Google Scholar
• Kolawole E 2008. Effects of competitive and cooperative learning strategies on academic performance of Nigerian students in mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 3(1): 33.
   Google Scholar
• Kubo K, Okazaki H, Ichikawa H, Nishihara S, Nawa H, Okazaki M, Kawasaki Y, Nakura H, Matsunaga H, Sendo T 2011. Usefulness of group work as a teaching strategy for long-term practical training in the 6-year pharmaceutical education. Yakugaku Zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 132(12): 1467–1476. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.12-00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letseka M, Maile S 2008. High University Drop-out Rates: A Threat to South Africa’s Future. HSRC Policy Brief. Pretoria: Human Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Abrami PC, Spence JC 2000. Effects of within-class grouping on student achievement: An exploratory model. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2): 101–112. doi: 10.1080/00220670009598748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Abrami PC, Spence JC, Poulsen C, Chambers B, D’apollonia S 1996. Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4): 423–458. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabelebele J 2015. The Future of Higher Education in South Africa. Higher Education Conference, 1st September 2015, PricewaterhouseCooper, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Mclean M, Van Wyk J, Peters-Futre E, Higgins-Opitz S 2006. The small group in problem based learning: More than a cognitive learning experience for first year medical students in a diverse population. Medical Teacher, 28(4): e94–e103. doi: 10.1080/01421590600726987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickelson JJ, Kaplan WE, Macneily AE 2009. Active learning: A resident’s reflection on the impact of a student-centred curriculum. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 3(5): 399. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar AS 1998. Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1): 345–375. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince T, Snowden E, Matthews B 2010. Utilising peer coaching as a tool to improve student-teacher confidence and support the development of classroom practice. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(1): 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson B, Schaible RM 1995. Collaborative teaching: Reaping the benefits. College Teaching, 43(2): 57–59. doi: 10.1080/87567555.1995.9925515
   Google Scholar
• Slavin RE 1990. Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3): 471–499. doi: 10.3102/00346543060003471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MK, Wood WB, Adams WK, Wieman C, Knight JK, Guild N, Su TT 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910): 122–124. doi: 10.1126/science.1165919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman M, Al-Shaikh G 2015. Readiness for self-directed learning among first year Saudi medical students: A descriptive study. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 31(4): 799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer L, Stanne M, Donovan S 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1): 21–52. doi: 10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen D, Welman J, Jordaan W 2004. English language proficiency as an indicator of academic performance at a tertiary institution. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(3): 42–53. doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v2i3.48
   Google Scholar