A generic model for glucose production from various cellulose sources by a commercial cellulase complex

References

• Aguado J, Romero MD, Monco G, Rodriguez L. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw-kinetic analysis. Acta Biotechnol 1993; 13(1)21–30
   Google Scholar
• Beldman G. 1986. The cellulases of Trichoderma viride; mode of action and application in biomass conversion. PhD thesis. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Beltrame P, Carniti P, Focher B, Marzetti A, Sarto V. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials: A kinetic study. Biotechnol Bioeng 1984; 26: 1233–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford MM. Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72(1–2)248–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish-Bowden A. Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. Portland Press Ltd, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Dekker RFH. Kinetic, inhibition, and stability properties of a commercial beta-d-glucosidase (cellobiase) preparation from Aspergillus niger and its suitability in the hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1986; 28(9)1438–1442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demerdash M, Attia RM. Thermal deactivation kinetics of cm-cellulase from a local isolate of Aspergillus niger (Rd-2231). Zentralbl Mikrobiol 1992; 147(7)477–482
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desai SG, Converse AO. Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1997; 56(6)650–655
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 1987; 59(2)257–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez G, Caminal G, Demas C, Lopezsantin J. A kinetic-model for pretreated wheat straw saccharification by cellulase. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 1989; 44(4)275–288
   Google Scholar
• Gregg DJ, Boussaid A, Saddler JN. Techno-economic evaluations of a generic wood-to-ethanol process: Effect of increased cellulose yields and enzyme recycle. Biores Technol 1998; 63(1)7–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen SE, Wyman CE. Cellulose and hemicellulose hydrolysis models for application to current and novel pretreatment processes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000; 84–6: 81–96
   Google Scholar
• Marchal LM. 1999. Towards a rational design of commercial maltodextrins: A mechanistic approach. Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Markovic I, Topolovec V, Markovic-Devcic B, Maric V. Use of the Foster–Niemann equation in study of the enzymic processes. Food Technol Biotechnol 2001; 39(4)347–352
   Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Steiner W. A new approach for modeling cellulase cellulose adsorption and the kinetics of the enzymatic-hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1993; 42(4)469–479
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Steiner W, Hayn M, Esterbauer H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw after steam pretreatment-experimental data and kinetic modeling. Biores Technol 1993; 44(1)25–32
   Google Scholar
• Nieves RA, Ehrman CI, Adney WS, Elander RT, Himmel ME. Survey and analysis of commercial cellulase preparations suitable for biomass conversion to ethanol. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998; 14(2)301–304
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien DJ, Roth LH, McAloon AJ. Ethanol production by continuous fermentation-pervaporation: A preliminary economic analysis. J Membr Sci 2000; 166(1)105–111
   Google Scholar
• Olivero I, Ruizmacias C, Chordi A, Peinado JM. Effect of external pH on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermenting maltose in batch and continuous culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 1982; 24(12)2725–2729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ooshima H, Kurakake M, Kato J, Harano Y. Enzymatic-activity of cellulase adsorbed on cellulose and its change during hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1991; 31(3)253–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortega N, Busto MD, Perez-Mateos M. Enzymatic saccharification of pretreated wheat straw by T. reesei cellulases and A. niger beta-glucosidase. Biocatal Biotransform 2000; 18(4)311–330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci-Jeanjean D, Belleville MP, Zakhia N, Rios GM. Kinetics of cassava starch hydrolysis with Termamyl (R) enzyme. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000; 68(1)71–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philippidis GP, Wyman CE. 1992. Production of alternative fuels: Modeling of cellulosic biomass conversion to ethanol. Rec Adv Biotechnol 405–411.
   Google Scholar
• Philippidis GP, Hatzis C. Biochemical engineering analysis of critical process factors in the biomass-to-ethanol technology. Biotechnol Prog 1997; 13(3)222–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philippidis GP, Spindler DD, Wyman CE. Mathematical modeling of cellulose conversion to ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1992a; 34–5: 543–556
   Google Scholar
• Philippidis GP, Spindler DD, Wyman CE. Mathematical modeling of cellulose conversion to ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1992b; 34–5: 543–556
   Google Scholar
• Philippidis GP, Smith TK, Wyman CE. Study of the enzymatic-hydrolysis of cellulose for production of fuel ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Biotechnol Bioeng 1993; 41(9)846–853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiding W, Thoma M, Ross A, Schugerl K. Modeling of the enzymatic-hydrolysis of cellobiose and cellulose by a complex enzyme mixture of Trichoderma reesei Qm 9414. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1984; 20(3)176–182
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan J, Himmel M. Enzymes, energy, and the environment: A strategic perspective on the US Department of Energy's Research and Development Activities for Bioethanol. Biotechnol Prog 1999; 15(5)817–827
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• South CR, Hogsett DAL, Lynd LR. Modeling simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose to ethanol in batch and continuous reactors. Enzyme Microbial Technol 1995; 17(9)797–803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas R, Panda T. pH and thermal stability studies of carboxymethyl cellulase from intergeneric fusants of Trichoderma reesei Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1998; 21(4–5)178–183
   Google Scholar
• Von Lieb C, Lucà S. Innovationen in Brennereien: Entwicklungsansätze zur gentechnischen Herstellung einer glucosetoleranten Cellobiase für die Nutzung cellulosehaltiger Rohstoffe. Brantweinwirtschaft 1999; 2: 282–285
   Google Scholar
• Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnol Prog 2003; 19(4)1109–1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J. Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: A tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol Prog 1999; 15(5)794–803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyman CE. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass-technology, economics, and opportunities. Biores Technol 1994; 50(1)3–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar