Interlocking characteristic and its correlation with interlayer shear strength in typical double-layered asphalt systems

References

• [REF]Ai, C., et al., 2022. Investigation of inter-layer bonding property in asphalt pavement based on 3D morphology of reconstructed interface. Construction and Building Materials, 317. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aver’yanova, I.O., Bogomolov, D.Y., and Poroshin, V.V., 2017. ISO 25178 standard for three-dimensional parametric assessment of surface texture. Russian Engineering Research, 37 (6), 513–516. doi: 10.3103/S1068798X17060053
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F.F.G., and Lu, X, 2013. Mechanical testing of interlayer bonding in asphalt pavements. Advances in Interlaboratory Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials: State-of-the-Art Report of the RILEM Technical Committee 206-ATB, 303–360.
   Google Scholar
• Čelko, J., Kováč, M., and Kotek, P., 2016. Analysis of the pavement surface texture by 3D scanner. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2994–3003. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.434
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-S., and Huang, C.-C., 2010. Effect of surface characteristics on bonding properties of bituminous tack coat. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180 (1), 142–149. doi: 10.3141/2180-16
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., et al., 2022. Reinforcement of interlaminar mechanical properties between rigid and flexible layers of semi-rigid base asphalt pavement using interlayer treatment. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China, C.o., 2004. Technical specifications for construction of highway asphalt pavements. Beijing: Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• China, C.o., 2011. Highway engineering asphalt and asphalt mixture test procedure. Beijing: Highway Research Institute Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, N.S., and Mugayar, A.N., 2021. Effect of binder rates and geogrid characteristics on the shear bond strength of reinforced asphalt interfaces. Construction and Building Materials, 269. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, A., et al., 2013. Interface roughness parameters and shear strength. Modern Applied Science, 7 (10. doi: 10.5539/mas.v7n10p1
   Google Scholar
• Das, A., et al., 2021. Surface microtexture and wettability analysis of quasi two-dimensional (Ti, Al)N thin films using fractal geometry. Surface and Coatings Technology, 421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y.S., Liu, Q.Q., and Cao, D.W., 2013. Research of influencing factor on the bending property of asphalt mixture based on grey correlation entropy. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 405-408, 1923–1927. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.1923
   Google Scholar
• Fen, Y., et al., 2011. Evaluation of shear performance of flexible waterproof-adhesive layer in concrete bridge pavement based on grey correlation analysis. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10 (sup1), 349–360. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2009.9690251
   Google Scholar
• Ghabchi, R., and Dharmarathna, C.P., 2020. Effect of tack coat emulsion type, application rate, and surface type and texture on early-age interlayer shear strength of pavements in cold regions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (6), 1881–1896. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1828587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goli, A., et al., 2023. Evaluation of mechanical characteristics and plastic coating efficiency in plastic-modified asphalt mixes. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 16 (3), 693–704. doi: 10.1007/s42947-022-00157-y
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., et al., 2021. Effects of design parameters and moisture conditions on interface bond strength between thin friction course (TFC) and underlying asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 269, 121347. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H., et al., 2023. Characterization of interlayer bonding mechanism based on interface morphology in double-layered asphalt systems. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 35 (6).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoła, J., et al., 2015. Usefulness of 3D surface roughness parameters for nondestructive evaluation of pull-off adhesion of concrete layers. Construction and Building Materials, 84, 111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristov, B., 2018. Influence of different interface properties on the interlayer bond shear stiffness. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 365. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/3/032056
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H.-S., et al., 2022. Investigation of texture effects at interlayer bonding behavior between asphalt concrete (AC) overlay on Portland cement concrete (PCC). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 49 (3), 412–419. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2020-0359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S., Das, A., and Venkatesh, K.S., 2021. Automated and contactless approaches for pavement surface texture measurement and analysis – a review. Construction and Building Materials, 301. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskula, P., et al., 2021. Optimisation and field assessment of poroelastic wearing course bond quality. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (sup1), S604–S623. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2021.1902844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogbara, R.B., et al., 2016. A state-of-the-art review of parameters influencing measurement and modeling of skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 114, 602–617. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ktari, R., et al., 2017. Surface roughness: a key parameter in pavement interface design. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 21 (sup1), 27–42. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2017.1304284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, G., Wang, S., and Shi, Q., 2016. Enhancing anti-rutting performance of asphalt pavement by dispersing shear stresses within asphalt layers. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (2), 453–469. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1253494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., et al., 2018. Interlayer shear strength of Roller compacted concrete (RCC) with various interlayer treatments. Construction and Building Materials, 166, 647–656. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., et al., 2017. Experimental study on interlayer shear properties of ERS pavement system for long-span steel bridges. Construction and Building Materials, 143, 198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros Jr, M., et al., 2021. 3D pavement macrotexture parameters from close range photogrammetry. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M.E., et al., 2015. Friction and cohesion coefficients of composite concrete-to-concrete bond. Cement and Concrete Composites, 56, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadolny, K, and Kaplonek, W., 2014. Analysis of flatness deviations for austenitic stainless steel workpieces after efficient surface machining. Measurement Science Review, 14 (4), 204–212. doi: 10.2478/msr-2014-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., 2011. Development of a framework for standardisation of interlayer bond of asphalt pavements. Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, C., Abd El Halim, A.O., and Partl, M.N., 2012. Interlayer bond testing using a model material. Construction and Building Materials, 26 (1), 190–199. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram Kumar, B.A.V., and Jallu, H., 2022. Performance of geogrid reinforced asphalt layers—a review. Recent Advancements in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of ACE 2020, 683–699.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, W., et al., 2018. Research on interlaminar shear properties of bridge deck asphalt pavement on chip-sprinkling cement concrete. Journal of Building Materials, 21 (01), 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, E., Calandra, I., and Kaiser, T.M., 2013. Feeding ecology and chewing mechanics in hoofed mammals: 3D tribology of enamel wear. Wear, 300 (1–2), 169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.01.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha, A., et al., 2020. Influence of sampling interval and evaluation area on the three-dimensional pavement parameters. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (9), 1964–1985. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2020.1736607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solatiyan, E., Bueche, N., and Carter, A., 2021. Laboratory evaluation of interfacial mechanical properties in geogrid-reinforced bituminous layers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49 (4), 895–909. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somé, S.C., et al., 2020. Mechanical characterization of asphalt mixes inter-layer bonding based on reptation theory. Construction and Building Materials, 242. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., et al., 2015. Factors affecting shear strength between open-graded friction course and underlying layer. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 527–535. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., et al., 2017. Influence of interface characteristics on the shear performance between open-graded friction course and underlying layer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (8. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., et al., 2018. Effects of asphalt mixture type on asphalt pavement interlayer shear properties. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144 (2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., et al., 2022. Laboratory investigation of the bonding performance between open-graded friction course and underlying layer. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 265. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., Huang, F., and Peng, H., 2021. Effect of 3D roughness characteristics on bonding behaviors between concrete substrate and asphalt overlay. Construction and Building Materials, 270. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman, L., et al., 2008. Evaluation of construction practices that influence the bond strength at the interface between pavement layers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 22 (3), 154–161. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:3(154)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G., 2016. State of the art: interface shear resistance of asphalt surface layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (10), 887–901. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1126270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wruck, B.M., et al., 2022. Impact of emulsion type, application rate, and adverse construction conditions on tack coat performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2677 (3), 535–550. doi: 10.1177/03611981221115733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., et al., 2023. Mesodamage mechanism of asphalt mixtures with different structural types under frost heaving of ice crystals. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 35 (1). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareiyan, B., and Khoshnevis, B., 2017. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Automation in Construction, 83, 212–221. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Cao, J., and Zheng, Y., 2017. Investigation of the interface bonding between concrete slab and asphalt overlay. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (sup3), 109–118. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2017.1329866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar