Joint enterprise in England and Wales: why problems persist despite legal change

References

• Amatrudo, T. (2016). Applying analytic reasoning to clarify intention and responsibility in joint enterprise cases. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6(4), 920–936.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. 2006. Principles of criminal Law (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. (2023). Changing the law on joint enterprise. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/news/2023-12-06/changing-law-joint-enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, J., & Leverick, F. (2008). Fair labelling in criminal law. The Modern Law Review, 71(2), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00689.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., & Chadwick, K. (2023). The criminalisation of women in joint enterprise cases: Exposing the limits to ‘serving’ girls and women justice. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 12(4), 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, B., Hulley, S., & Wright, S. (2020). Life imprisonment from young adulthood: Adaptation, identity and time. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service. (2019). Secondary Liability Charging Decisions on Principals and Accessories. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/secondary-liability-charging-decisions-principals-and-accessories.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service. (2023). Crown Prosecution Service Joint Enterprise Pilot 2023: Data Analysis. https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/crown-prosecution-service-joint-enterprise-pilot-2023-data-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois-Pedain, A. (2016). Violent dynamics: Exploring, responsibility-attribution for harms inflicted during spontaneous group violence. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6, 1053–1078.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, A. (2020). Art or confession? Evaluating rap lyrics as evidence in criminal cases. Race and Justice, 10(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717749879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, M. (2018). Principals without distinction. Criminal Law Review, 4, 296–320.
   Google Scholar
• Fastis, L. (2023). The road, In court: How UK drill music became a criminal offence. In J. Levell, T. Young, & R. Earle (Eds.), Exploring urban youth culture outside of the gang paradigm: Critical questions of youth, gender and race On-road (pp. 100–114). Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forde, L. (2021). Welfare, justice, and diverse models of youth justice: A children’s rights analysis. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 29(4), 920–945. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-29040005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerry, F., Allely, C., & Rowland, A. (2021). Autism spectrum disorder and the criminal law. https://www.libertaschambers.com/wp-content/uploads/Autism-Spectrum-Disorder-and-the-Criminal-Law-Felicity-Gerry-June-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A., & McGourlay, C. (2015). The wolf packs in our midst and other products of criminal joint enterprise prosecutions. The Journal of Criminal Law, 79(4), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018315597816
   Google Scholar
• Horder, J. 2019. Ashworth’s principles of criminal Law (9th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulley, S. (2021). Defending ‘Co-offending’ women: Recognising domestic abuse and coercive control in ‘joint enterprise' cases involving women and their intimate partners. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 60(4), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12445
   Google Scholar
• Hulley, S., Crewe, B., & Wright, S. (2019). Making sense of ‘joint enterprise’ for murder: Legal legitimacy or instrumental acquiescence? The British Journal of Criminology, 59(6), 1328–1346. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilan, J. (2020). Digital street culture decoded: Why criminalizing drill music is street illiterate and counterproductive. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 994–1013. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judicial College. (2023). The crown court compendium. Part I: Jury and trial management and summing up. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Crown-Court-Compendium-Part-I-June-2023-updated-Feb-2024.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kern Griffin, L. (2013). Narrative, truth, and trial. Georgetown Law Journal, 101, 281–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, A., Jacobson, J., & Hunter, G. (2016). Prosecuting joint enterprise cases: Seeking ways through the fog. British Society of Criminology Newsletters, 79, 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, B. (2018). Oblique intent, foresight and authorisation. UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 7(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, B. (2019). Joint enterprise murder is dead – long live joint enterprise manslaughter? In B. Krebs (Ed.), Accessorial liability after jogee (pp. 107–132). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, D., Ormerod, D., Tonking, S., & Wait, J. (2016). The Crown Court Compendium. Part I: Jury and Trial Management and Summing Up. Judicial College.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, H., Ford, M., & Grimshaw, R. (2022). The usual suspects (2nd ed.). https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/publications/usual-suspects-second-edition.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Statistics. (2023). UK population by ethnicity: Age groups. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/demographics/age-groups/latest/.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu-Bempah, A. (2022). The irrelevance of rap, criminal law review. Criminal Law Review, 2, 130–151.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, V., Sarch, A., & Walker, S. (2019). Thinking like an accomplice: The mens Rea for complicity in US and English law after rosemond and jogee. In B. Krebs (Ed.), Accessorial liability after jogee (pp. 157–180). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simester, A. (2006). The mental element of complicity. Law Quarterly Review, 122(4), 578–601.
   Google Scholar
• Smartt, T. (2018). The doctrine of extended joint criminal enterprise: A “wrong turn’ in Australian common law. Melbourne University Law Review, 41(3), 1324–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., & Gray, P. (2019). The changing shape of youth justice: Models of practice. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 19(5), 554–571. doi: 10.1177/1748895818781199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107
   Google Scholar
• Stark, F. (2016). The demise of “parasitic accessorial liability”: Substantive judicial law reform, not common law housekeeping. The Cambridge Law Journal, 75(3), 550–579. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197316000611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. R. (2019). Law reform in the supreme court: The abolition of joint enterprise. In B. Krebs (Ed.), In accessorial liability after jogee (pp. 7–28). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Sliedregt, E. (2019). Joint criminal confusion: Exploring the merits and demerits of joint enterprise liability. In B. Krebs (Ed.), In accessorial liability after Jogee (pp. 181–208). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch, A. (1992). Proportionality in the philosophy of punishment. Crime and Justice, 16, 55–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/449204
   Google Scholar
• Wang, V. B. (2019). A normative case for abolishing the doctrine of extended joint criminal enterprise. The Journal of Criminal Law, 83(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018318822219
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, M. (2019). Extended joint criminal enterprise – ‘top-down’ or ‘bottoms-up’ legal reasoning? In B. Krebs (Ed.), In accessorial liability after jogee (pp. 209–246). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Clarke, B. (2016). Dangerous associations: Joint enterprise, Gangs and Racism. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Dangerous%20assocations%20Joint%20Enterprise%20gangs%20and%20racism.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Young, T., & Hulley, S. (in press). "It's tantalising evidence … but you've got to look at the wider picture": Rap music as evidence in joint enterprise cases. Crime, Media, Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Young, T., Hulley, S., & Pritchard, G. (2020). A ‘good job’ in difficult conditions: Detectives’ reflections, decisions and discriminations in the context of ‘joint enterprise’. Theoretical Criminology, 24(3), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620907592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar