Assessing the Impact of an Adapted Robotics Programme on Interest in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) among Children with Disabilities

References

• Adams, K. D., & Cook, A. M. (2013). Programming and controlling robots using scanning on a speech generating communication device: A case study. Technology and Disability, 25(4), 275–286.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, K. D., & Cook, A. M. (2017). Performing mathematics activities with non-standard units of measurement using robots controlled via speech-generating devices: Three case studies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(5), 491–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargerhuff, M. E., Cowan, H., & Kirch, S. A. (2010). Working toward equitable opportunities for science students with disabilities: Using professional development and technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5(2), 125–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cabibihan, -J.-J., Javed, H., Ang, M., & Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 593–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Academies. (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s Productivity: The expert panel on STEM skills for the future. Canada: Council of Canadian Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Caprile, M., Palmén, R., Sanz, P., & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies: Labour market situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states (Report No. PE 542.199). European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum associates.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. E. B., & Hardin, S. E. (2013). Making STEM fun: How to organize a STEM camp. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Donegan-Ritter, M. (2017). Stem for all children: Preschool teachers supporting engagement of children with special needs in physical science learning centers. Young Exceptional Children, 20(1), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsey, R., Park, C. H., & Howard, A. (2014). Developing the capabilities of blind and visually impaired youth to build and program robots. Annual Int. Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, San Diego, CA. (pp. 55–67).
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, C., Rabren, K. S., Taylor, S. L., & Dotson, C. K. (2012). Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eguchi, A. (2016). RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 692–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, A. D. (2010). Children’s self-assessment of their school work in elementary school. Education 3–13, 38(1), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, V. N., Crossland, C. L., & Stiff, L. V. (2013). Predicting eighth-grade algebra placement for students with individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Washington: US. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, L., Asunda, P. A., Plant, S. J., & Goad, C. (2011). Asynchronous online access as an accommodation on students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders in postsecondary STEM courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(4), 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, N., Wolfe, G., Jones, S., Todd, R., Moon, N., & Langston, C. (2016). STEM E-mentoring and community college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, S., Knight, V., Collins, B. C., & Spriggs, A. D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A. M., Park, C. H., & Remy, S. (2012). Using haptic and auditory interaction tools to engage students with visual impairments in robot programming activities. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(1), 87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K. H., & Huang, P.-L. (2011). Lego robotics and group learning: Exploring the effects of gender, age, and family background. Paper presented at the Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference, Xi'an China.
   Google Scholar
• Huijnen, C. A., Lexis, M. A., Jansens, R., & de Witte, L. P. (2016). Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 2100–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley-Turnbaugh, S., Wilson, G., & Lovewell, L. (2009). Increasing the accessibility of science for all students. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 13(1), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., & Hounsell, K. G. (2017). Adapting a robotics program to enhance participation and interest in STEM among children with disabilities: A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(7), 694–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., Hounsell, K. G., & Cassiani, C. (2017). A scoping review of the role of LEGO® therapy for improving inclusion and social skills among children and youth with autism. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., McDougall, C., Menna-Dack, D., Sanford, R., & Adams, T. (2015). An ecological approach to understanding barriers to employment for youth with disabilities compared to their typically developing peers: Views of youth, employers, and job counselors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(8), 701–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludi, S., & Reichlmayr, T. (2011). The use of robotics to promote computing to pre-college students with visual impairments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(3), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. (Final report).
   Google Scholar
• Marino, M. T. (2010). Defining a technology research agenda for elementary and secondary students with learning and other high-incidence disabilities in inclusive science classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Meyen, E. L., & Greer, D. L. (2010). Applying technology to enhance STEM achievement for students with disabilities: The blending assessment with instruction program. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. T., Krockover, G. H., & Doughty, T. (2013). Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with a moderate to severe intellectual disability: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 887–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr‐Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., … Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing middle school students’ interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: See blue STEM camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291–301.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, N. W., Todd, R. L., Morton, D. L., & Ivey, E. (2012). Accommodating students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Atlanta, GA: Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology (pp. 8–21).
   Google Scholar
• Moon, N. W., Utschig, T. T., Todd, R. L., & Bozzorg, A. (2011). Evaluation of programmatic interventions to improve postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: Findings from Scitrain university. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(4), 331–349.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, M. A. (2007). Inclusive pedagogy: Teaching methodologies to reach diverse learners in science instruction. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(3), 252–265.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. US: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Newley, A., Deniz, H., Kaya, E., & Yesilyurt, E. (2016). Engaging Elementary and middle school students in robotics through hummingbird kit with snap! visual programming language. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age (JOLTIDA), 1(2), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, L., & McPake, J. (2013). Seven myths about young children and technology. Childhood Education, 89(1), 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, L. E., Schmidt, J., Sowers, J.-A., & McCracken, K. (2015). Qualitative investigation of the influence of STEM mentors on youth with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(1), 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., & Starling, M. (2008). Self‐assessment in a technology‐supported environment: The case of grade 9 geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(2), 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, A. C., Stefanich, G. P., Haselhuhn, C. W., & Peiffer, B. (2009). A working conference on students with disabilities in STEM coursework and careers. Online Submission. Iowa City: College of Education, University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D., Law, M., Young, N. L., Forhan, M., Healy, H., Burke-Gaffney, J., & Freeman, M. (2014). Complexities during transitions to adulthood for youth with disabilities: Person–Environment interactions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(23), 1998–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, C. D., Koff, R., Fields, H., Kuehne, L., Handlin, L., Getty, M., & Parker, D. R. (2012). Expanding access to STEM for at-risk learners: A new application of universal design for instruction. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(4), 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, F. R., & Heffernan, J. (2016). Robotic construction kits as computational manipulatives for learning in the STEM disciplines. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 105–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supalo, C. A., Hill, A. A., & Larrick, C. G. (2014). Summer enrichment programs to foster interest in STEM education for students with blindness or low vision. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1257–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supalo, C. A., Isaacson, M. D., & Lombardi, M. V. (2013). Making hands-on science learning accessible for students who are blind or have low vision. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(2), 195–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. S., Vasquez, E., & Donehower, C. (2017). Computer programming with early elementary students with Down Syndrome. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(3), 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh, L. P. E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P.-W., Chen, I., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel, R. J., Lexis, M. A., Gelderblom, G. J., Jansens, R. M., & de Witte, L. P. (2016). Robots and ICT to support play in children with severe physical disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(2), 103–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar