Attitudes and Perceived Communicative Competence: The Impact of Different AAC Means of Communication among Italian Teenagers

References

• Achmadi, D., van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., O’Reilly, M. F., Lang, R., … Marschik, P. B. (2015). Undergraduates’ perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(1), 22–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M., Morris, C., Tarrant, M., Abraham, C., & Horton, M. C. (2017). Rasch analysis of the Chedoke–McMaster Attitudes towards children with handicaps scale. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(3), 281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Bock, S., Thompson, J. R., Bowman, L., & Robbins, S. (2006). Is awesome really awesome? How the inclusion of informal terms on an AAC device influences children’s attitudes toward peers who use AAC. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(1), 56–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Bock, S., Thompson, J. R., & Kosuwan, K. (2002). Influence of communicative competence and augmentative and alternative communication technique on children’s attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12(2), 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Fritz-Verticchio, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(1), 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Kingsbury, K., Neff, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Influence of length of augmented message on children’s attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(906376414), 239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Thompson, J., Clay, S., Hutchins, M., Vogt, W. P., Romaniak, B., & Sokolowski, B. (2001). Preservice professionals’ attitudes toward children who use augmentative/alternative communication. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 255–271.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Thompson, J. R., Kosuwan, K., & Prochnow, J. M. (2010). The development and utilization of a scale to measure adolescents’ attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(3), 572–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Haog, L. A., & McCoy, K. F. (2004). Relevance and speed of messages delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 800–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L., Calculator, S. N., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1105–1113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Johnson, D. E., & Calculator, S. N. (1998). Communicative competence as perceived in adults with severe speech impairment associated with cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(3), 667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., Armstrong, R. W., O’Connor, A., & Freeman, R. (1993). Children’s attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(4), 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bossaert, G., Colpin, H., Pijl, S. J., & Petry, K. (2011). The attitudes of Belgian adolescents towards peers with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2002). A comparative study of the attitudes of teachers at special and educationally inclusive schools towards learners with little or no functional speech using communication devices. South African Journal of Education, 22(3), 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Horn, T., Samuels, A., & Schlosser, R. (2016). Children ’s attitudes toward interaction with an unfamiliar peer with complex communication needs: Comparing high- and low-technology devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 305–311).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Laat, S., Freriksen, E., & Vervloed, M. P. (2013). Attitudes of children and adolescents toward persons who are deaf, blind, paralyzed or intellectually disabled. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 855–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, K. (1993). Preschool children’s concepts of disability in their peers. Early Education and Development, 4(2), 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Dudek, K., Beck, A. R., & Thompson, J. R. (2006). The influence of AAC device type, dynamic vs. static screen, on peer attitudes. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(1), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gertner, B., Rice, M., & Hadley, R. (1994). Influence of communicative competence on peer preferences in a preschool classroom. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 913–923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorenflo, C., & Gorenflo, D. (1991). The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal+of+Speech+and+Hearing+Research, 34(1), 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hyppa-martin, J., Collins, D., Chen, M., Amundson, C., Mizuko, M., Collins, D., … Amundson, C. (2016). Comparing first graders ’ attitudes and preferences toward a peer using an iPad -based speech-generating device and a non-electronic AAC system comparing first graders ’ attitudes and preferences toward a peer using an. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(2), 94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. R., Kim, Y. T., Lee, H. J., & Park, E. H. (2015). Influence of message error type on Korean adults’ attitudes toward an individual who uses augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 159–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasker, J., & Beukelman, D. R. (1999). Peers’ perceptions of storytelling by an adult with aphasia. Aphasiology, 1, 857–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., Lilienfeld, M., Alant, E., & Alant, E. (2002). Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. W., & Light, J. (2005). Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(1), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., DeWit, D. J., King, G., Miller, L. T., & Killip, S. (2004). High school‐aged youths’ attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(3), 287–313.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012). The intelligibility in context scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 648‐656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki, E., & Sandieson, R. (2002). A meta-analysis of school-age children’s attitudes towards persons with physical or intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49, 243–265.
   Google Scholar
• Radici, E., Heboyan, V., Mantovani, F., & De Leo, G. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes towards children who use AAC in Italian primary schools. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 66(3), 284–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., Armstrong, R. W., & King, S. M. (1986). Children’s attitudes toward disabled peers: A self-report measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, J. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vignes, C., Coley, N., Grandjean, H., Godeau, E., & Arnaud, C. (2008). Measuring children’s attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of instruments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50(3), 182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignes, C., Godeau, E., Sentenac, M., Coley, N., Navarro, F., Grandjean, H., & Arnaud, C. (2009). Determinants of students’ attitudes towards peers with disabilities. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51(6), 473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar