REFERENCES
- Angelo , D. H. 2000 . Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. . Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 16 : 37 – 47 .
- Angelo , D. H. , Kokoska , S. M. and Jones , S. D. 1996 . Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. . Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 12 : 13 – 20 .
- Barnicle , K. 1991 . “ Evaluating assistive devices: What you need to know. ” . In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference: Technology and Persons with Disabilities 43 – 52 . Los Angeles, CA
- Beukelman , D. and Mirenda , P. 1998 . Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults, , 2nd edition Baltimore, MD : Paul H. Brookes .
- Blackstone , S. 1993 . Abandonment of assistive technology: What consumers need to know and professionals need to find out. . Augmentative Communication News , 5 ( 3 ) : 2
- Blackstone , S. , Hunt-Berg , M. , Soto , G. , Kingsbury , E. , Liboirin , N. , Dowden , P. and Wrenn , M. 2001 . Social networks: Augmented communicators and their communication partners Miniseminar presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA
- Brofenbrenner , U. 1979 . The ecology of human development Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
- Carroll , M. and Phillips , B. 1993 . Survey on assistive technology abandonment by new users Washington, DC : National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research . (Cooperative Agreement H133E0016)
- Christensen , J. 1988 . Human factors definitions. . HFS Bulletin , 1 ( 3 ) : 8 – 9 .
- DeRuyter , F. and Kennedy , M. 1990 . “ Augmentative communication following traumatic brain injury. ” . In Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury Edited by: Beukelman , D. R. and Yorkston , K. M. Austin, TX : Pro-Ed .
- DeRuyter , F. , Kennedy , M. and Doyle , M. 1990 . Augmentative communication and stroke rehabilitation: Who is doing what and does the data tell the whole story? Presented to the National Stroke Rehabilitation Conference, Boston, MA
- Donahue-Kilburg , G. 1992 . Family centered early intervention for communication disorders: Prevention and treatment Gaithersburg, MD : Aspen .
- Dunst , C. , Trivette , C. and Deal , A. 1988 . Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice Cambridge, MA : Brookline .
- Jinks , A. and Sinteff , B. 1994 . Consumer response to AAC devices: Acquisition, training, use and satisfaction. . Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 10 ( 3 ) : 184 – 190 .
- Joyce , M. 2001 . Future AAC technology needs: Consumer perspectives. Paper presented at the State of the Science Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, St. Paul, MN
- Krogh , K. S. and Lindsay , P. 1999 . Including people with disabilities in research: Implications for the field of augmentative and alternative communication. . Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 15 : 222 – 233 . (4)
- Lasker , J. and Bedrosian , J. 2001 . Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. . Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 17 ( 3 ) : 141 – 153 .
- Mathy , P. 1998 . Best practice factors to consider in assessment: Adults with motor neuron disease. . Augmentative Communication News: , 11 ( 1/2 ) : 5 – 6 .
- Mizuko , M. I. 1987 . Transparency and ease of learning symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. . Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 3 : 129 – 136 .
- Parette , H. and Angelo , D. 1998 . “ Impact of assistive technology devices on families. ” . In Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services Edited by: Judge , S. L. and Parette , H. P. 148 – 183 . Cambridge, MA : Brookline .
- Phillips , B. and Rodnax , D. D. 1992 . National survey on abandonment of technology Washington, DC : National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research . (Cooperative Agreement H133E80016)
- Rackensperger , T. , Williams , M. , Krezman , C. and McNaughton , D. 2001 . TECH 2010: How do people learn to use an augmentative communication device? Presentation at the AACRERC State of the Science Conference, Minneapolis, MN
- Scherer , M. 2000 . Living in the state of stuck: How assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities, , 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA : Brookline .
- Scherer , M. and Craddock , G. 2001 . Applying the matching person and technology evaluation process. . Library Hi Tech News , 18 ( 1 ) : 40 – 42 .
- Scherer , M. J. 1998 . Matching person and technology model and accompanying assessment instruments Webster, NY : Institute for Matching Person and Technology .
- Silverman , F. 1995 . Communication for the speechless, , 3rd ed. Boston : Allyn and Bacon .
- Tewey , B. P. , Barnicle , K. and Perr , A. 1994 . The wrong stuff. . Mainstream , 19 ( 2 ) : 19 – 23 .
- Turnbull , A. and Turnbull , H. 1990 . Families, professionals and exceptionality: A special partnership, , 2nd ed. Columbus, OH : Merrill .
- Turner , E. , Barrett , C. , Cutshall , A. , Lacy , B. K. , Keiningham , J. and Webster , M. K. 1995 . “ The user's perspective of assistive technology. ” . In Assistive technology: A resource for school, work and community Edited by: Flippo , K. F. , Inge , K. J. and Barcus , J. M. 283 – 290 . Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes. .
- Whyte , W. F. , ed. 1991 . Participatory action research Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
- Williams , M. B. 2001 . Future AAC technology needs: Consumer perspectives Paper presented at the State of the Science Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, St. Paul, MN