Evaluating person-centered factors associated with brain–computer interface access to a commercial augmentative and alternative communication paradigm

References

• Ahn, M., & Jun, S. C. (2015). Performance variation in motor imagery brain–computer interface: A brief review. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 243, 103–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacci, E. D., Staniewska, D., Coyne, K. S., Boyer, S., White, L. A., Zach, N., & Cedarbaum, J. M., & Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials Consortium. (2016). Item response theory analysis of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale-revised in the pooled resource open-access ALS clinical trials database. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration, 17(3–4), 157–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/21678421.2015.1095930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckung, E., & Hagberg, G. (2002). Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44(5), 309–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162201002134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701553668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blain-Moraes, S., Schaff, R., Gruis, K. L., Huggins, J. E., & Wren, P. A. (2012). Barriers to and mediators of brain–computer interface user acceptance: Focus group findings. Ergonomics, 55(5), 516–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumberg, J. S., Pitt, K. M., Mantie-Kozlowski, A., & Burnison, J. C. (2018). Brain–Computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication: A tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumberg, J. S., Burnison, J. D., & Pitt, K. M. (2016). Using motor imagery to control brain–computer interfaces for communication. In D. D. Schmorrow & C. M. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Foundations of augmented cognition: Neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience (pp. 14–25). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cedarbaum, J. M., & Stambler, N. (1997). Performance of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS) in multicenter clinical trials. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 152(S1), S1–S9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-510x(97)00237-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daly, I., Billinger, M., Laparra-Hernández, J., Aloise, F., García, M. L., Faller, J., Scherer, R., & Müller-Putz, G. (2013). On the control of brain–computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124(9), 1787–1797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, A.-C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rösblad, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Öhrvall, A.-M., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(7), 549–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2006.tb01313.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvrum, A.-K. G., Andersen, G. L., Himmelmann, K., Beckung, E., Öhrvall, A.-M., Lydersen, S., & Vik, T. (2016). Bimanual fine motor function (BFMF) classification in children with cerebral palsy: Aspects of construct and content validity. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.20124.975314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., Mooney, A., & Peters, B. (2015). Supporting communication for patients with neurodegenerative disease. NeuroRehabilitation, 37(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, E. V., McFarland, D. J., Neuper, C., Vaughan, T. M., Brunner, P., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2009). A scanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface. Biological Psychology, 80(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler, M. W., & Polich, J. (1990). P300 and time of day: Circadian rhythms, food intake, and body temperature. Biological Psychology, 31(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(90)90012-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geronimo, A., Simmons, Z., & Schiff, S. J. (2016). Performance predictors of brain-computer interfaces in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(2), 026002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026002 Article 026002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosmanova, K. A., Carmack, C. S., Goldberg, D., Fitzpatrick, K., Zoltan, B., Zeitlin, D. M., Wolpaw, J.R., Maehle, O.A., Borge, A., & Vaughan, T. M. (2017). EEG-based brain-computer interface access To Tobii Dynavox Communicator 5. Rehabilitation Engineering and AssistiveTechnology Society of North America, 4. https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/conference/2017/pdf_versions/cac/Gosmnova.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halder, S., Agorastos, D., Veit, R., Hammer, E. M., Lee, S., Varkuti, B., Bogdan, M., Rosenstiel, W., Birbaumer, N., & Kübler, A. (2011). Neural mechanisms of brain-computer interface control. Neuroimage, 55(4), 1779–1790. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, E. M., Halder, S., Blankertz, B., Sannelli, C., Dickhaus, T., Kleih, S., Müller, K.-R., & Kübler, A. (2012). Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI-AAC performance. Biological Psychology, 89(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500483588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasahara, T., Terasaki, K., Ogawa, Y., Ushiba, J., Aramaki, H., & Masakado, Y. (2012). The correlation between motor impairments and event-related desynchronization during motor imagery in ALS patients. BMC Neuroscience, 13(1). Article 66, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-66.
   Google Scholar
• Kleih, S. C., & Kübler, A. (2015). Psychological factors influencing brain-computer interface (BCI-AAC) performance. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 3192–3196). Kowloon, China. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2015.554
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, G., Pizzimenti, A., Simione, L., Riccio, A., Schettini, F., Inghilleri, M., Mattia, D., & Cincotti, F. (2015). Developing brain-computer interfaces from a user-centered perspective: Assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 139–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., Beukelman, D., Fager, S. K., Fried-Oken, M., Jakobs, T., & Jakobs, E. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in augmentative and alternative communication: Research and technology development to enhance communication and participation for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1556732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotte, F., & Guan, C. (2010). Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI-AAC designs: Unified theory and new algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(2), 355–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2010.2082539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., Grodzicki, L., Jones, J., Panek, E., & Parkin, E. (2006). Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: The performance of typically developing 2-year-olds. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00498250600718621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meador, K. J. (1998). Cognitive side effects of medications. Neurologic Clinics, 16(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(05)70371-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrden, A., & Chau, T. (2015). Effects of user mental state on EEG-BCI-AAC performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. Article 308, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00308
   Google Scholar
• Neuper, C., Scherer, R., Reiner, M., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2005). Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual–motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 668–677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nijboer, F., Birbaumer, N., & Kübler, A. (2010). The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis -a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 1–13 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00055
   Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., & Praamstra, P. (2001). The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(4), 713–719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00527-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller, G., & Da Silva, F. L. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11), 1842–1857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, K. M., & Brumberg, J. S. (2018b). A screening protocol incorporating brain–computer interface feature matching considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology, 32(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1512175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, K. M., & Brumberg, J. S. (2018a). Guidelines for feature matching assessment of brain–computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 950–964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, K. M., Brumberg, J. S., Burnison, J. D., Mehta, J., & Juhi, K. (2019). Behind the scenes of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces: A review of electroencephalography signals, how they are recorded, and why they matter. ASHA Perspectives, 4(6), 1622–1636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_PERS-19-00059
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, K. M., Brumberg, J. S., & Pitt, A. R. (2019). Considering augmentative and alternative communication research for brain-computer interface practice. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 13(Summer), 1–20. www.atia.org/atob
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, A. B., Jackson, M. M., & Karmakar, S. (2010). Individual characteristics and their effect on predicting mu rhythm modulation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.535750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimbert, S., Gayraud, N., Bougrain, L., Clerc, M., & Fleck, S. (2019). Can a subjective questionnaire be used as brain-computer interface performance predictor? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. Article 529, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00529
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Billinger, M., Wagner, J., Schwarz, A., Tassilo Hettich, D., Bolinger, E., Garcia, M. L., Navarro, J., & Müller-Putz, G. (2015). Thought-based row-column scanning communication board for individuals with cerebral palsy. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 58(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2014.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar, U., Hazarika, S. M., & Gan, J. Q. (2019). Motor imagery and mental fatigue: Inter-relationship and EEG based estimation. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 46(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-018-0701-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. E., Gruis, K. L., & Huggins, J. E. (2014). A plug-and-play brain-computer interface to operate commercial assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 9(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.785036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, M. C. (2018). Critiquing the concept of BCI-AAC illiteracy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(4), 1217–1233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0061-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velliste, M., Perel, S., Spalding, M. C., Whitford, A. S., & Schwartz, A. B. (2008). Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature, 453(7198), 1098–1101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuckovic, A., & Osuagwu, B. A. (2013). Using a motor imagery questionnaire to estimate the performance of a brain-computer interface based on object oriented motor imagery. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124(8), 1586–1595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, S. C. (2014). ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen manual. The Forbes Norris MDA/ALS Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, S. C., York, M. K., Moore, D. H., Strutt, A. M., Murphy, J., Schulz, P. E., & Katz, J. S. (2010). Detecting frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS: Utility of the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS). Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 11(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/17482961003727954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. Z., Jadavji, Z., Zewdie, E., & Kirton, A. (2019). Evaluating if children can use simple brain computer interfaces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. Article 24, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00024
   Google Scholar
• Zickler, C., Riccio, A., Leotta, F., Hillian-Tress, S., Halder, S., Holz, E., Staiger-Sälzer, P., Hoogerwerf, E. J., Desideri, L., Mattia, D., & Kübler, A. (2011). A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 42(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/155005941104200409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar