Conversation turns and speaking roles contributed by Mandarin Chinese dyadic conversations between adults who use speech-generating devices and adults who use natural speech

References

• American Speech-Language -Hearing Association. (2002). Augmentative and alternative communication: Knowledge and skills for service delivery. ASHA Supplement, 22, 97–106. http://www.asha.org/docs/pdf/KS2002-00067.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language -Hearing Association. (2005). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to alternative communication: Position statement. http://www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/BA19B90C-1C17-4230-86A8-83B4E12E4365/0/v3PSaac.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Engineering Lab Inc. (2013). Smart AAC [Computer software]. Taipei, Taiwan: Assistive Technology Engineering Lab, Inc. https://itunes.apple.com/tw/app/smart-aac/id524619556?mt=8
   Google Scholar
• Attainment Company Inc. (2018). GoTalk Express 32 [Computer software]. Verona, WI: Attainment Company Inc. https://www.attainmentcompany.com/gotalk-express-32
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 38–55). New York Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(3), 229–242. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=c8h&AN=2010889826&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-livePublisherURL:www.cinahl.com/cgi-bin/refsvc?jid=609&accno=2010889826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 272–282. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/07434610400005614
   Google Scholar
• Boles, L., & Bombard, T. (1998). Conversational discourse analysis: Appropriate and useful sample sizes. Aphasiology, 12(7–8), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buder, E. H. (1991). A nonlinear dynamic model of social interaction. Communication Research, 18(2), 174–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J., & Wiemann, J. M. (1988). Turn taking in atypical conversations: The case of the speaker/augmented-communicator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31(1), 3–18. http://jslhr.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/31/1/3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (2007). Developmental considerations in addressing the AAC needs of children with severe disabilities. In R. Paul (Ed.), Language disorders from a developmental perspective: Essays in honor of Robin S. Chapman. New directions in communication disorders research: Integrative approaches (pp. 357–376). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-M., Lee, S.-E., Chang, M.-H., & Hsu, T.-C. (1998). The Concise Chinese Aphasia Test (CCAT) and its applications. The Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 13, 119–137. doi:10.6143/JSLHAT.1998.06.11.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T. (2005). Conversational interaction between children using communication aids and their peers [PhD Doctoral dissertation]. University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 336–348. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/07434610701390350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). The arcsine transformation and the effect size index. In J. Cohen (Ed.), Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 180–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M. (1987). Outcome measurement: The impact of communication augmentation. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082437
   Google Scholar
• Elder, J. H. (1999). Videotaped behavioral observations: Enhancing validity and reliability. Applied Nursing Research, 12(4), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(99)80273-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetzer, A., & Akman, V. (2002). Contexts of social action: Guest editors’ introduction. Language & Communication, 22(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00016-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel, A. (1993). Two principles of communication, coregulation and framing. In J. Nadel & L. Camainoni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 9–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T. (1991). Language and social skills: Implications for clinical assessment and intervention with school-age children. In T. M. Gallagher (Ed.), Pragmatics of language: Clinical practice issues (pp. 11–41). Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. A. (1990). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power-and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(6), 883–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90045-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guralnick, M. J., & Paul-Brown, D. (1989). Peer-related communicative competence of preschool children: Developmental and adaptive characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32(4), 930–943. http://jslhr.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(1), 11–13. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/07434619512331277099
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Caves, K. (2002). AAC performance and usability issues: The effect of AAC technology on the communicative process. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Kim, K.-E., & Scally, C. (2007). The effect of the communication output method on augmented interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 140–153. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/07434610601045344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T. (1983). A new look at interruption. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374104
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, M. M. (2004a). Therapy talk: Analyzing therapeutic discourse. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(1), 70–81. http://lshss.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/35/1/70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, M. M. (2004b). Therapy talk: Analyzing therapeutic discourse. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/008)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. Z. (2001). Cooperative and intrusive interruptions in inter-and intracultural dyadic discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X01020003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I- discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618512331273561
   Google Scholar
• McTear, M., & King, F. (1991). Miscommunication in clinical contexts: The speech therapy interview. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Miscommunication and problematic talk (pp. 195–214). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E., & Soto, G. (2002). Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610212331281181
   Google Scholar
• Norén, N., Samuelsson, C., & Plejert, C. (2013). Aided communication in dialogical perspectives: Augmentative and alternative communication as action and participation within embodied social worlds. J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, C. (2004). Dyadic interaction with a child with multiple disabilities: A system theory perspective on communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 228–242. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/07434610400005622
   Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B., Svensson, L., Coggins, T. E., Beilinson, J. S., & Donaldson, A. L. (2006). Reliability issues and solutions for coding social communication performance in classroom settings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(5), 1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/075)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, M. L. (2007). Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials (6th ed.). Pyrczak Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall-Health.
   Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(2), 105–119. http://jshd.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/52/2/105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quist, R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1997). High technology. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 137–168). Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, M., & Duckett, E. (1989). “We were just talking”: Conversations in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18(6), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15(1), 163–191. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0084-6570%281986%292%3A15%3C163%3ALS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Kingston, D., & Schultz, M. (2004). “Speaking for another”: The management of participant frames in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2), 114–127. http://ajslp.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/13/2/114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. C. (2003). Environmental influences on aided language development: The role of partner adaptation. In S. Von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 155–175). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., & Beattie, G. (1986). On judging the ends of speaker turns in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8652003
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, L. N. (2007). Discovering communicative competencies in a nonspeaking child with autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(4), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/041)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14–56). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 57–76). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Rubin, C., Croot, K., Power, E., Savage, S. A., Hodges, J. R., & Togher, L. (2017). Communication behaviors associated with successful conversation in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(10), 1619–1632. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217000813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.-J. (2013). The effect of familiarity of conversation partners on conversation turns contributed by augmented and typical speakers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(8), 2326–2335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.-J., Scherz, J., & DiLollo, A. (2011). Conversation of augmented and typical speakers—Speaking roles versus conversation turns. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing, 14(4), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1179/jslh.2011.14.4.179
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L. S., Brehm, S. E., & Montgomery, E. B. (2006). Analysing conversational discourse after traumatic brain injury: Isn’t it about time? Brain Impairment, 7(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.7.3.234
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L. S., Ciccia, A., & Seaton, C. (2003). Interactive behaviors in adolescent conversation dyads. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(2), 117–127. http://lshss.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/34/2/117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, I. P. (2007). Small talk is” big talk” in clinical discourse: Appreciating the value of conversation in SLP clinical interactions. Topics in Language Disorders, 27(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200701000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemann, J. M. (1981). Effects of laboratory videotaping procedures on selected conversation behaviors. Human Communication Research, 7(4), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00577.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemann, J. M. (1985). Interpersonal control and regulation in conversation. In R. L. Street & J. N. Cappella (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communicative behaviour (pp. 85–102). Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemann, J. M., & Knapp, M. L. (1975). Turn-taking in conversations. The Journal of Communication, 25(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1975.tb00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. P., Wiemann, J. M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Models of turn taking in conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3(3), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8400300301
   Google Scholar