A scoping review of communication outcomes measures in augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019a). Study designs: Part 2–Descriptive studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019b). Study designs: Part 4–Interventional studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(3), 137. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_91_19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Almirall, D., DiStefano, C., Chang, Y. C., Shire, S., Kaiser, A., Lu, X., & Kasari, C. (2016). Longitudinal effects of adaptive interventions with a speech-generating device in minimally verbal children with ASD. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(4), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1138407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Alzrayer, N. M. (2020). Transitioning from a low-to high-tech Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) system: Effects on augmented and vocal requesting. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1813196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Alzrayer, N. M., Aldabas, R., Alhossein, A., & Alharthi, H. (2021). Naturalistic teaching approach to develop spontaneous vocalizations and augmented communication in children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2021.1881825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• *Babb, S., Gormley, J., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2019). Enhancing independent participation within vocational activities for an adolescent with ASD using AAC video visual scene displays. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418795842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Babb, S., Jung, S., Ousley, C., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2021). Personalized AAC intervention to increase participation and communication for a young adult with Down syndrome. Topics in Language Disorders, 41(3), 232. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Babb, S., McNaughton, D., Light, J., Caron, J., Wydner, K., & Jung, S. (2020). Using AAC video visual scene displays to increase participation and communication within a volunteer activity for adolescents with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1737966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A., Bean, A., Cargill, L. P., & Lyle, S. (2022). Within arm’s reach: The role of proximity in speech generating device use of ambulatory children with autism. International journal of speech-language pathology, 24(1), 88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barker, R. M., Akaba, S., Brady, N. C., & Thiemann-Bourque, K. (2013). Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(4), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.848933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high‐technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bayldon, H., Clendon, S., & Doell, E. (2021). Shared storybook intervention for children with complex physical, cognitive and sensory needs who use partner-assisted scanning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 70(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2021.1913719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2020). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• *Bock, S. J., Stoner, J. B., Beck, A. R., Hanley, L., & Prochnow, J. (2005). Increasing functional communication in non-speaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 264–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture exchange communication system (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on social-communicative skills and speech development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.818059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Borgestig, M., Al Khatib, I., Masayko, S., & Hemmingsson, H. (2021). The impact of eye-gaze controlled computer on communication and Functional independence in children and young people with complex needs–A multicenter intervention study. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 24(8), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2021.1903603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., Thiemann-Bourque, K., Fleming, K., & Matthews, K. (2013). Predicting language outcomes for children learning augmentative and alternative communication: Child and environmental factors. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56(5), 1595–1612. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0102)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brock, K., Koul, R., Corwin, M., & Schlosser, R. (2017). A comparison of visual scene and grid displays for people with chronic aphasia: A pilot study to improve communication using AAC. Aphasiology, 31(11), 1282–1306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1274874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, K., Harrop, D., Judge, S., Jones, G., & Sage, K. (2019). Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 28(10), 2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bryen, D. N., Cohen, K. J., & Carey, A. (2004). Augmentative communication Employment Training and Supports (ACETS): Some Employment-related outcomes. Journal of Rehabilitation, 70(1). 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Caron, J., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2020). Effects of an AAC app with transition to literacy features on single-word reading of individuals with complex communication needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920911152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chan, J., Falk, T. H., Teachman, G., Morin McKee, J., & Chau, T. (2010). Evaluation of a non-invasive vocal cord vibration switch as an alternative access pathway for an individual with hypotonic cerebral palsy–a case study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483100903278107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Chapin, S. E., McNaughton, D., Light, J., McCoy, A., Caron, J., & Lee, D. L. (2022). The effects of AAC video visual scene display technology on the communicative turns of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Assistive Technology, 34(5), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1893235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Childes, J. M., Palmer, A. D., Fried-Oken, M., & Graville, D. J. (2017). The use of technology for phone and face-to-face communication after total laryngectomy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Clarke, M., Newton, C., Cherguit, J., Donlan, C., & Wright, J. A. (2011). Short‐term outcomes of communication aid provision. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(4), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/17549451111190597
   Google Scholar
• *Conklin, C. G., & Mayer, G. R. (2011). Effects of implementing the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with adults with developmental disabilities and severe communication deficits. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Flores, C., Bastable, K., & Schlosser, R. W. (2021). The effects of augmentative and alternative communication interventions on the receptive language skills of children with developmental disabilities: A scoping review. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2020.1797165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D. L., & Wolfson, C. (2002). Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user Evaluation of satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110066352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Desai, T., Chow, K., Mumford, L., Hotze, F., & Chau, T. (2014). Implementing an iPad-based alternative communication device for a student with cerebral palsy and autism in the classroom via an access technology delivery protocol. Computers & Education, 79, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, S. K., & Wallace, S. E. (2018). A modified multimodal communication treatment for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test-IIIA. American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby, P. (2014). Introducing the therapy outcome measure for AAC services in the context of a review of other measures. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(1), 33–40. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.823576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Falk, T. H., Chan, J., Duez, P., Teachman, G., & Chau, T. (2010). Augmentative communication based on realtime vocal cord vibration detection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 18(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2039593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick S, & Reilly J. (1993). MacArthur communicative development inventories. Singular.
   Google Scholar
• *Ferm, U., Sahlin, A., Sundin, L., & Hartelius, L. (2010). Using talking mats to support communication in persons with Huntington’s disease. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(5), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820903222809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Strozier, S., Franklin, S., & Hil, D. (2012). A comparison of communication using the apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.644579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, L. A., & Bondy, A. S. (1994). PECS training manual. Newark: Pyramid Educational Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• *Ganz, J. B., Parker, R., & Benson, J. (2009). Impact of the picture exchange communication system: Effects on communication and collateral effects on maladaptive behaviors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(4), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434610903381111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ganz, J. B., & Simpson, R. L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the picture exchange communication system in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000037416.59095.d7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ganz, J. B., Simpson, R. L., & Corbin-Newsome, J. (2008). The impact of the Picture exchange communication system on requesting and speech development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and similar characteristics. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gevarter, C., Groll, M., & Stone, E. (2020). Dynamic assessment of augmentative and alternative communication application grid formats and communicative targets for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(4), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1845236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gevarter, C., Groll, M., Stone, E., & Medina Najar, A. (2021). A parent-implemented embedded AAC intervention for teaching navigational requests and other communicative functions to children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37(3), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2021.1946846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gevarter, C., Horan, K., & Sigafoos, J. (2020). Teaching preschoolers with autism to use different speech-generating device display formats during play: Intervention and secondary factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Griffith, J., Dietz, A., & Weissling, K. (2014). Supporting narrative retells for people with aphasia using augmentative and alternative communication: Photographs or line drawings? Text or no text? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), S213–S224. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hagan, L., & Thompson, H. (2014). It’s good to talk: Developing the communication skills of an adult with an intellectual disability through augmentative and alternative communication. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hamm, B., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500395493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hampton, L. H., Kaiser, A. P., & Fuller, E. A. (2020). Multi-component communication intervention for children with autism: A randomized controlled trial. Autism, 24(8), 2104–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320934558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, L. E., & Traughber, M. C. (2021). Improving facilitation of student communication through observational feedback within a partner instruction model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(2), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hux, K., Buechter, M., Wallace, S., & Weissling, K. (2010). Using visual scene displays to create a shared communication space for a person with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(5), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902869299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Icht, M., Levine-Sternberg, Y., & Mama, Y. (2020). Visual and auditory verbal long-term memory in individuals who rely on augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md: 1985), 36(4), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1852443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ivy, S., Robbins, A., & Kerr, M. G. (2020). Adapted picture exchange communication system using tangible symbols for young learners with significant multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(3), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1826051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Johnson, R. K., Hough, M. S., King, K. A., Vos, P., & Jeffs, T. (2008). Functional communication in individuals with chronic severe aphasia using augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802463957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kasari, C., Kaiser, A., Goods, K., Nietfeld, J., Mathy, P., Landa, R., Murphy, S., & Almirall, D. (2014). Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(6), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M., Rajaniemi, J. P., & Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers, 24(5), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *King, M., Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. A. (2020). Growing up with AAC in the digital age: A longitudinal profile of communication across contexts from toddler to teen. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1782988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, T., & Hill, K. (2015). A tutorial on reliability testing in AAC language sample transcription and analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1036118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., Oliva, D., Campodonico, F., de Pace, C., Chiapparino, C., & Groeneweg, J. (2009). Persons with multiple disabilities accessing stimulation and requesting social contact via microswitch and VOCA devices: New research evaluation and social validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(5), 1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker, J. A., Scherer, M. J., Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., & DeRuyter, F. (2005). Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assistive Technology, 17(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2005.10132092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lerna, A., Esposito, D., Conson, M., & Massagli, A. (2014). Long‐term effects of PECS on social–communicative skills of children with autism spectrum disorders: A follow‐up study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(4), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618912331275126
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Barwise, A., Gardner, A. M., & Flynn, M. (2021). Personalized early AAC intervention to build language and literacy skills: A case study of a 3-year-old with complex communication needs. Topics in Language Disorders, 41(3), 209. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Mcnaughton, D. (2015). Designing aac research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2006). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part I–What is a “good” outcome? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(4), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600718693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mathisen, B., Arthur-Kelly, M., Kidd, J., & Nissen, C. (2009). Using MINSPEAK: A case study of a preschool child with complex communication needs. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(5), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100902807112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *McMillan, J. M., & Renzaglia, A. (2014). Supporting speech generating device use in the classroom. Part two: Student communication outcomes. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(3), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900304.
   Google Scholar
• *Meinzen-Derr, J., Sheldon, R., Altaye, M., Lane, L., Mays, L., & Wiley, S. (2021). A Technology-assisted language intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: A randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics, 147(2). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-025734.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Derr, J., Sheldon, R. M., Henry, S., Grether, S. M., Smith, L. E., Mays, L., & Wiley, S. (2019). Enhancing language in children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing using augmentative and alternative communication technology strategies. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 125, 23–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Meinzen-Derr, J., Wiley, S., McAuley, R., Smith, L., & Grether, S. (2017). Technology-assisted language intervention for children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing; a pilot study of augmentative and alternative communication for enhancing language development. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(8), 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1269210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Mohan, V., Kunnath, S. K., Philip, V. S., Mohan, L. S., & Thampi, N. (2019). Capitalizing on technology for developing communication skills in autism spectrum disorder: A single case study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1413144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mongeau, C., & Lussier-Desrochers, D. (2017, July). Mobile technologies used as communication support system for people with intellectual disabilities: An exploratory study. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 254–263). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, A., Bean, A., & Sonntag, A. M. (2021). Language sample collection and analysis in people who use augmentative and alternative communication: Overcoming obstacles. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mooney, A., Bedrick, S., Noethe, G., Spaulding, S., & Fried-Oken, M. (2018). Mobile technology to support lexical retrieval during activity retell in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 32(6), 666–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1447640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorcroft, A., Scarinci, N., & Meyer, C. (2019). A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 14(7), 710–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning. AGS.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, P., Delgado, C., Block, J., Venezia, M., Hogan, A., & Seibert, J. (2003). Early social communication scales (ESCS). FL: Coral Gables.
   Google Scholar
• *Olive, M. L., Lang, R. B., & Davis, T. N. (2008). An analysis of the effects of functional communication and a voice output communication aid for a child with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Parsons, D., Vaz, S., Lee, H., Robinson, C., & Cordier, R. (2020). A twelve-month follow-up of an information communication technology delivered intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder living in regional Australia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 106, 103743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Quinn, E. D., Kaiser, A. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2020). Teaching preschoolers with Down syndrome using augmentative and alternative communication modeling during small group dialogic reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ricci, C., Miglino, O., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., & Lancioni, G. E. (2017). Speech generating technology to support request responses of persons with intellectual and multiple disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63(4), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1288888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Romski, M. A., Haarbauer-Krupa, J., Cheslock, M., Sevcik, R. A., & Adamson, L. B. (2008). Language and communication changes in a child with holoprosencephaly: A case report. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16(2), 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• *Rose, V., Paynter, J., Vivanti, G., Keen, D., & Trembath, D. (2020). Predictors of expressive language change for children with autism spectrum disorder receiving AAC-infused comprehensive intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(1), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04251-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. (2011). Using the communication matrix to assess expressive skills in early communicators. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740110394651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J. (2017). Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: Integrating various assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 12(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1253939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Koul, R. K. (2015). Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(4), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1063689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Seale, J. M., Bisantz, A. M., & Higginbotham, J. (2020). Interaction symmetry: Assessing augmented speaker and oral speaker performances across four tasks. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1782987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Senner, J. E., Post, K. A., Baud, M. R., Patterson, B., Bolin, B., Lopez, J., & Williams, E. (2019). Effects of parent instruction in partner-augmented input on parent and child speech generating device use. Technology and Disability, 31(1–2), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-190228
   Google Scholar
• *Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Adamson, L. B. (2004). Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(21–22), 1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280412331280352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. O. (2000). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in education. Diagnostique, 25(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770002500403
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. O. (2016). The emergence and emergency of assistive technology outcomes research methodology. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 10(1), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• *Snodgrass, M. R., Stoner, J. B., & Angell, M. E. (2013). Teaching conceptually referenced core vocabulary for initial augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.848932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Son, S. H., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9(4), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490500519984.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Soto, G., Clarke, M. T., Nelson, K., Starowicz, R., & Savaldi-Harussi, G. (2020). Recast type, repair, and acquisition in AAC mediated interaction. Journal of Child Language, 47(1), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd edition manual ed.) NCS Pearson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• *Sreekumar, S., Sangeetha, G. S., & Mathew, B. S. (2019). Advancement to higher communicative functions with transition to iPad app–a case report. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(4), 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1629116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tan, P., & Alant, E. (2018). Using peer-mediated instruction to support communication involving a student with autism during mathematics activities: A case study. Assistive Technology, 30(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1223209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Therrien, M. C., & Light, J. (2016). Using the iPad to facilitate interaction between preschool children who use AAC and their peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1205133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thomas-Stonell, N., Robertson, B., Oddson, B., & Rosenbaum, P. (2016). Communicative participation changes in pre-school children receiving augmentative and alternative communication intervention. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1060530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thunberg, G., Ahlsén, E., & Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2007). Children with autistic spectrum disorders and speech‐generating devices: Communication in different activities at home. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(6), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200701314963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thunberg, G., Ahlsen, E., Sandberg, A. D., & Clarke, M. (2011). Autism, communication and use of a speech-generating device in different environments – A case study. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(4), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17549451111190605
   Google Scholar
• *Thunberg, G., Sandberg, A. D., & Ahlsén, E. (2009). Speech-generating devices used at home by children with autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary assessment. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357608329228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpe, E. M., Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., Hahs-Vaughn, D., Harrington, N., & Schwartz, J. B. (2021). Using the ImPAACT Program with preschoolers with Down syndrome: A hybrid service-delivery model. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37(2), 113–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Trembath, D., Balandin, S., Togher, L., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2009). Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250902845210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tatenhove, G. (2014). Issues in language sample collection and analysis with children using AAC. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac23.2.65
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C., Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. (2021). Spoken vocabulary outcomes of toddlers with developmental delay after parent-implemented augmented language intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(3), 1023–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wandin, H., Lindberg, P., & Sonnander, K. (2021). Aided language modelling, responsive communication and eye-gaze technology as communication intervention for adults with Rett syndrome: Three experimental single case studies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1967469
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). IFC: International Classification of functioning, disability and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, P. J., & Lieberman, R. G. (2010). Brief report: Randomized test of the efficacy of Picture Exchange Communication System on highly generalized picture exchanges in children with ASD. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 40, 629–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar