Provoking a Conversation Around Students’ and Supervisors’ Expectations Regarding Workplace Learning

References

• Yardley S, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, et al. What has changed in the evidence for early experience? Update of a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;32(9):740–746. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.496007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume BD, Ford JK, Baldwin TT, et al. Transfer of training: a meta-analytic review. J Manage. 2010;36(4):1065–1105. doi:10.1177/0149206309352880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke LA, Hutchins HM. Training transfer: an integrated literature review. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2007;6(3):263–296. doi:10.1177/1534484307303035.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi-GröHn T, Engeström Y, Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing. 1st ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Pergamon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Peters S, Clarebout G, Van Nuland M, et al. A qualitative exploration of multiple perspectives on transfer of learning between classroom and clinical workplace. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(1):22–32. doi:10.1080/10401334.2017.1339605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrella A, Milman T, Ginsburg S, et al. Navigating tensions of efficiency and caring in clerkship: a qualitative study. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(4):378–384. [published Online First: 2019/01/01] doi:10.1080/10401334.2018.1556667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry-Noel N, Bishop M, Gwede CK, et al. Mentorship in medicine and other health professions. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(4):629–637. [published Online First: 2018/04/25] doi:10.1007/s13187-018-1360-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaufberg EH, Batalden M, Sands R, et al. The hidden curriculum: what can we learn from third-year medical student narrative reflections? Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1709–1716. [published Online First: 2010/10/01] doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f57899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo J, Brett-MacLean P, Cave MT, et al. At the precipice: a prospective exploration of medical students’ expectations of the pre-clerkship to clerkship transition. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21(1):141–162. [published Online First: 2015/07/15] doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9620-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters S, Clarebout G, Van Nuland M, et al. How to connect classroom and workplace learning. Clin Teach. 2017;14(5):313–319. doi:10.1111/tct.12697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell L, Bourgeois-Law G, Buydens S, et al. Your goals, my goals, our goals: the complexity of coconstructing goals with learners in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(4):370–377. [published Online First: 2019/03/16] doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1576526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundler AJ, Bjork M, Bisholt B, et al. Student nurses’ experiences of the clinical learning environment in relation to the organization of supervision: a questionnaire survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(4):661–666. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke LA, Saks AM. Accountability in training transfer: adapting Schlenker's model of responsibility to a persistent but solvable problem. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2009;8(3):382–402. doi:10.1177/1534484309336732.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J. Transferring clinical communication skills from the classroom to the clinical environment: perceptions of a group of medical students in the United Kingdom. Acad Med. 2010;85(6):1052–1059. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbf76f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley S. Sense made common: how to add value to early experience. Clin Teach. 2014;11(1):5–9. doi:10.1111/tct.12050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masters KS, Kreeger PK. Ten simple rules for developing a mentor-mentee expectations document. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(9):e1005709. [published Online First: 2017/09/22] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie J. Bringing it all together. In: Hattie JAC, ed. Visible Learning: A Synthesis over 800 Meta-Analysis Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge; 2009:237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Ho A, Watkins D, Kelly M. The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: an evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Educ. 2001;42(2):143–169.
   Google Scholar
• Geraci SA, Thigpen SC. A review of mentoring in academic medicine. Am J Med Sci. 2017;353(2):151–157. [published Online First: 2017/02/12] doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2016.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reusser K. Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes B, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London, UK: Elsevier Ltd; 2001:2058–2062.
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Hatala R. Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond. Adv Simul. 2016;1(1):31. [published Online First: 2016/12/07] doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Artino AR, Jr., La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, et al. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–474. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Willis GB, Artino AR, Jr. What do our respondents think we're asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):353–356. [published Online First: 2014/01/10] doi:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, et al. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326(7393):816–819. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth T, Efstathiou N, Vanderspank-Wright B, et al. The use of Delphi and Nominal Group technique in nursing education: a review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;60:112–120. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ. 2005;331(7517):631–633. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7517.631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):14–19. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C, et al. A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11(4):218–224. doi:10.1258/135581906778476553.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waggoner J, Carline JD, Durning SJ. Is there a consensus on consensus methodology? Descriptions and recommendations for future consensus research. Acad Med. 2016;91(5):663–668. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach. 2005;27(7):639–643. doi:10.1080/13611260500069947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PJ, Lam-McCulloch J, Herold-McIlroy J, et al. Simulation performance checklist generation using the Delphi technique. Can J Anesth. 2007;54(12):992–997. doi:10.1007/BF03016633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol. 1997;17(4):373–386. doi:10.1080/0144341970170401.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behling O, Law KS. Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments: Problems and Solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• von der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2012;79:1525–1536. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haji FA, Khan R, Regehr G, et al. Operationalising elaboration theory for simulation instruction design: a Delphi study. Med Educ. 2015;49(6):576–588. doi:10.1111/medu.12726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden M, Major CH. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dierckx de Casterlé B, Gastmans C, Bryon E, et al. QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(3):360–371. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega FM, Dolmans D, Vargas-Castro N, et al. Dealing with the tension: how residents seek autonomy and participation in the workplace. Med Educ. 2017;51(7):699–707. [published Online First: 2017/04/25] doi:10.1111/medu.13326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Scheele F, Scherpbier A, et al. How residents learn: qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Med Educ. 2007;41(8):763–770. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02778.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega FM, Dolmans DH, Guzman-Quintero C, et al. Unravelling residents' and supervisors' workplace interactions: an intersubjectivity study. Med Educ. 2018;52(7):725–735. [published Online First: 2018/06/08] doi:10.1111/medu.13603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout JJ, Helmich E, Teunissen PW, et al. Context matters when striving to promote active and lifelong learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):34–44. [published Online First: 2017/10/07] doi:10.1111/medu.13463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar