Learning Clinical Reasoning: The Experience of Postgraduate Psychiatry Trainee Doctors in Qatar

References

• Eva KW, Hatala RM, Leblanc VR, Brooks LR. Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1152–1158. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02923.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnock R, Welch P. Learning clinical reasoning. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(4):253–257. doi:10.1111/jpc.12455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Patient Safety - Data and Statistics. Published 2017. https://www.who.int/patientsafety/policies/en/%0D. Accessed November 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rodziewicz T, Hipskind J. Medical Error Prevention - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. StatPearls Publishing. Published 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499956/. Accessed November 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Connor DM, Durning SJ, Rencic JJ. Clinical reasoning as a core competency. Acad Med. 2020;95(8):1166–1171. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G, Eva K. Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):94–100. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03507.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Mamede S. How cognitive psychology changed the face of medical education research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(5):1025–1043. doi:10.1007/s10459-020-10011-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süß HM, Oberauer K, Wittmann WW, Wilhelm O, Schulze R. Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability - And a little bit more. Intelligence. 2002;30(3):261–288. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00100-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case K, Harrison K, Roskell C. Differences in the clinical reasoning process of expert and novice cardiorespiratory physiotherapists. Physiotherapy. 2000;86(1):14–21. doi:10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61321-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert L, Teather D, Teather B, Sharples M. Expert/novice differences in diagnostic medical cognition - A review of the literature. In: Cognitive Science Research Paper; 1999:1–33, February. doi:10.1.1.136.978.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Six Theories of Child Development. Vol. 6. JAI Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Torre D, Durning SJ. Social cognitive theory: thinking and learning in social settings. In: Cleland J, Durning SJ, eds. Researching Medical Education. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015:105–116. doi:10.1002/9781118838983.ch10.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44(9):1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Observational learning. In: Wolfgang D, ed. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008:1–3. doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbieco004.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 1989;18(1):32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AL. The promise of situated cognition. New Directions Adult Continuing Educ. 1993;1993(57):71–79. doi:10.1002/ace.36719935709.
   Google Scholar
• Olson APJ, Durning SJ, Fernandez Branson C, Sick B, Lane KP, Rencic JJ. Teamwork in clinical reasoning – cooperative or parallel play? Diagnosis. 2020;7(3):307–312. doi:10.1515/dx-2020-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo AT, Woolley AW. Teamwork in health care: Maximizing collective intelligence via inclusive collaboration and open communication. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(9):933–940. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.stas2-1609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper N, Bartlett M, Gay S, et al. Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2021;43(2):152–159. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monrouxe LV, Beck E, Da Silva ALS, Mukhalalati B. Applications of social theories of learning in health professions education programs: A scoping review. Front Med. 2022;9:912751. https://www.researchregistry.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert CY, Graham L, West C, et al. Teaching metacognitive skills: Helping your physician trainees in the quest to “know what they don’t know. Am J Med. 2015;128(3):318–324. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosior K, Wall T, Ferrero S. The role of metacognition in teaching clinical reasoning: Theory to practice. Educ Health Prof. 2019;2(2):108. doi:10.4103/EHP.EHP_14_19.
   Google Scholar
• Marcum JA. An integrated model of clinical reasoning: Dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(5):954–961. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01900.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando I, Cohen M, Henskens F. A systematic approach to clinical reasoning in psychiatry. Australas Psychiatry. 2013;21(3):224–230. doi:10.1177/1039856213486209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey T. Mental health strategy and impact evaluation in Qatar. BJPsych Int. 2017;14(1):18–21. doi:10.1192/s2056474000001628.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tripathi A, Das A, Kar S. Biopsychosocial model in contemporary psychiatry: Current validity and future prospects. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41(6):582–585. doi:10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_314_19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Online Qatar. Qatar population and expat nationalities. Published 2019. https://www.onlineqatar.com/visiting/tourist-information/qatar-population-and-expat-nationalities. Accessed January 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Sebele-Mpofu FY. Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review. Cogent Soc Sci. 2020;6(1). doi:10.1080/23311886.2020.1838706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler AE, Copnell B, Hall H. The development of theoretical sampling in practice. Collegian. 2018;25(5):561–566. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2018.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):98–106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):291–295. doi:10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Alhojailan MI. Thematic analysis : A critical review of its process and evaluation. In: WEI International European AcademicConference Proceedings. Vol. 1;2012:8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions Program Eval. 1986;1986(30):73–84. In: doi:10.1002/ev.1427.
   Google Scholar
• Bahmanbijari B, Beigzadeh A, Etminan A, Rahmati Najarkolai A, Khodaei M, Seyed Askari SM. The perspective of medical students regarding the roles and characteristics of a clinical role model. Electron Phys. 2017;9(4):4124–4130. doi:10.19082/4124.
   Google Scholar
• Wright S. Examining what residents look for in their role models. Acad Med. 1996;71(3):290–292. doi:10.1097/00001888-199603000-00024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazigi A, Nasr M, Sleilaty G, Nemr E. Clinical teachers as role models: Perceptions of interns and residents in a Lebanese medical school. Med Educ. 2006;40(7):654–661. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02502.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perversi P, Yearwood J, Bellucci E, et al. Exploring reasoning mechanisms in ward rounds: A critical realist multiple case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):643. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3446-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolsgaard MG, Kulasegaram KM, Ringsted CV. Collaborative learning of clinical skills in health professions education: The why, how, when and for whom. Med Educ. 2016;50(1):69–78. doi:10.1111/medu.12814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-Efficacy. In: Ramachaudran VS, ed. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Academic Press; Vol 4;1994:71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Bucknall T. The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses’ decision-making. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43(3):310–319. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02714.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torralba KD, Jose D, Byrne J. Psychological safety, the hidden curriculum, and ambiguity in medicine. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(3):667–671. doi:10.1007/s10067-019-04889-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock AH, Kim S, Chung EK. Bridging the gap between educator and learner: The role of psychological safety in medical education. Pediatrics. 2022;149(1):e2021055028. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-055028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MJ. Relationship between stress management self-efficacy, stress mindset, and vocational student success [Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences]. Minneapolis, MN: Walden University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychologist. 1982;37(2):122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass JL, Kalyuga S. Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educ Psychol Rev. 2019;31(2):339–359. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski D, Hutchinson M, Hurley J, Rowley J, Sutherland J. The role of emotion in clinical decision making: An integrative literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):255. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langridge N, Roberts L, Pope C. The role of clinician emotion in clinical reasoning: Balancing the analytical process. Man Ther. 2016;21:277–281. doi:10.1016/J.MATH.2015.06.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bush T. Overcoming the barriers to effective clinical supervision. Nurs Times. 2005;101(2).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D, Burnard P, Hannigan B, et al. Clinical supervision and burnout: The influence of clinical supervision for community mental health nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(8):1007–1015. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01370.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman MV, Halbesleben JRB, Holmes O. Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. J Organiz Behav. 2014;35(1):38–53. doi:10.1002/job.1852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl KA, O’Leary-Kelly AM, Martocchio JJ. The impact of feedback and self‐efficacy on performance in training. J Organiz Behav. 1993;14(4):379–394. doi:10.1002/job.4030140409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen E, Van Tartwijk J, Dornan T. Teaching rounds: the self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective. BMJ. 2008;336(7648):827–830. doi:10.1136/bmj.39503.608032.AD.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korthagen F. Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vol 28; 2001:4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson L. Twelve tips for teaching reflection at all levels of medical education. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):200–205. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.507714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stice JE. Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education. 1987;77(5):291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary TJ, Battista A, Konopasky A, Ramani D, Durning SJ, Artino AR. Effects of live and video simulation on clinical reasoning performance and reflection. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):17. doi:10.1186/s41077-020-00133-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isaza-Restrepo A, Gómez MT, Cifuentes G, Argüello A. The virtual patient as a learning tool: A mixed quantitative qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):297. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1395-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keiser MM, Turkelson C. Using simulation to evaluate clinical performance and reasoning in adult-geriatric acute care nurse practitioner students. J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(10):599–603. doi:10.3928/01484834-20190923-08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plackett R, Kassianos AP, Kambouri M, et al. Online patient simulation training to improve clinical reasoning: A feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):245. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02168-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watari T, Tokuda Y, Owada M, Onigata K. The utility of virtual patient simulations for clinical reasoning education. IJERPH. 2020;17(15):5325. doi:10.3390/ijerph17155325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddy CR. Sample size for qualitative research. Qual Mark Res. 2016;19(4):426–432. doi:10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(6):669–684. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Qi L, Zhang B. Concepts and evaluation of saturation in qualitative research. Adv Psychol Sci. 2022;30(3):511–521. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00511.
   Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Artino AR, Boulet JR, Dorrance K, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. The impact of selected contextual factors on experts’ clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(1):65–79. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9294-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rencic J, Schuwirth LWT, Gruppen LD, Durning SJ. Clinical reasoning performance assessment: Using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020;7(3):241–249. doi:10.1515/dx-2019-0051.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mustafa G, Glavee-Geo R, Gronhaug K, Saber Almazrouei H. Structural impacts on formation of self-efficacy and its performance effects. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):860. doi:10.3390/su11030860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar