43
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

A screening-level human health risk assessment of dietary intake of pesticide residues in produce as compared to consumer guide recommendations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 30 Nov 2023, Accepted 02 Feb 2024, Published online: 16 Apr 2024

References

  • AgMRC. 2021a. Celery. November 2021. Ames, IA: Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (AgMRC).
  • AgMRC. 2021b. Spinach. Ames, IA: Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (AgMRC).
  • AgMRC. 2021c, November. Tomatoes. Ames, IA: Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (AgMRC).
  • AgMRC. 2023a, January. Cherries. Ames, IA: Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (AgMRC).
  • AgMRC. 2023b January. Grapes. Ames, IA: Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (AgMRC).
  • AgMRC. 2023c, February. Pears. Ames, IA: Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (AgMRC).
  • Ansai N, Wambogo EA. 2021. Fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in the United States, 2015–2018. NCHS Data Brief. (397):1–8. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db397-H.pdf
  • ATSDR. 2015, August. Public health statement. Endosulfan. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
  • Benbrook C, Kegley S, Baker B. 2021. Organic farming lessens reliance on pesticides and promotes public health by lowering dietary risks. Agronomy. 11(7):1266. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11071266.
  • Boon PE, Van der Voet H, Van Raaij MTM, Van Klaveren JD. 2008. Cumulative risk assessment of the exposure to organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides in the Dutch diet. Food Chem Toxicol. 46(9):3090–3098. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.083.
  • Brandhorst T, Klein B. 2019. Uncertainty surrounding the mechanism and safety of the post-harvest fungicide fludioxonil. Food Chem Toxicol. 123:561–565. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.037.
  • Bunch TR, Bond C, Buhl K, Stone D. 2014. National Pesticide Information Center. Spinosad General fact sheet. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Services.
  • ECHA. 2017. Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of fludioxonil (ISO); 4-(2,2-difluoro-1,3 benzodioxol-4-yl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile; EC Number: -; CAS Number: 131341-86-1; CLH-O-0000001412-86-162/F. https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/8c6afd44-d310-fd1b-df4e-eea922ec279f.
  • EWG. 2022. EWG's shopper’s guide to pesticides in produce: summary. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Working Group (EWG).
  • Faniband M, Ekman E, Littorin M, Maxe M, Larsson E, Lindh CH. 2019. Biomarkers of exposure to pyrimethanil after controlled human experiments. J Anal Toxicol. 43(4):277–283. doi: 10.1093/jat/bky091.
  • FDA. 2020. Pesticide residue monitoring program fiscal year 2020 pesticide report. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
  • FSI. 2022a. Collard greens. Fort Collins, CO: Food Source Information (FSI).
  • FSI. 2022b. Kale: food source information. Fort Collins, CO: Food Source Information (FSI).
  • Gervais J, Hanson W, Cross A, Jenkins J. 2022. National Pesticide Information Center. Chlorantrantraniliprole general fact sheet. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Services.
  • Gervais JA, Luukinen B, Buhl K, Stone D. 2010. National Pesticide Information Center. Imidacloprid general fact sheet. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Services.
  • Holman E, Gray G. 2014. Setting pesticide reference doses: a retrospective analysis examining key data and choices. Human Ecol Risk Assess. 20(6):1550–1564. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2013.879017.
  • Jardim ANO, Brito AP, van Donkersgoed G, Boon PE, Caldas ED. 2018. Dietary cumulative acute risk assessment of organophosphorus, carbamates and pyrethroids insecticides for the Brazilian population. Food Chem Toxicol. 112:108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.12.010.
  • JMPR. 2004. Pesticide residues in food – 2004: evaluations – part II – toxicological. Sponsored jointly by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) with the support of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group Rome, Italy, 20–29 September 2004. https://www.inchem.org/documents/jmpr/jmpmono/v2004pr01.pdf.
  • Kolakowski BM, Miller L, Murray A, Leclair A, Bietlot H, van de Riet JM. 2020. Analysis of glyphosate residues in foods from the Canadian retail markets between 2015 and 2017. J Agric Food Chem. 68(18):5201–5211. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07819.
  • Lazicki P, Geisseler D, Horwath W. 2015. Peach and nectarine production in California. Davis, CA: UC Davis, University of California.
  • Louie F, Jacobs NFB, Yang LGL, Park C, Monnot AD, Bandara SB. 2021. A comparative evaluation of dietary exposure to glyphosate resulting from recommended U.S. diets. Food Chem Toxicol. 158:112670. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112670.
  • NOP. 2000. 7 US Code of Federal Regulations § 205. Washington, DC: National Organic Program (NOP), U.S. Government Publishing Office.
  • NPIC. 2000. Captan technical fact sheet. Corvallis, OR: National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC), Oregon State University.
  • OEHHA. 2009, April. Public health goals for chemicals in drinking water. Oxamyl. Sacramento, CA: Office of Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)-California Environmental Protection Agency.
  • PAN. 2022a. What’s on my food? | Pesticides: a public problem. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022b. What’s on my food? Apples. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022c. What’s on my food? Celery. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022d. What’s on my food? Cherries. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022e. What’s on my food? Grapes. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022f. What’s on my food? Greens, collard. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022g. What’s on my food? Greens, kale. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022h. What’s on my food? Nectarines. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022i. What’s on my food? Peaches. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022j. What’s on my food? Pears. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022k. What’s on my food? Spinach. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022l. What’s on my food? Strawberries. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022m. What’s on my food? Sweet bell peppers. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. 2022n. What’s on my food? Tomatoes. North America (PAN), San Francisco: Pesticide Action Network.
  • PAN. Europe. 2023, August 10. Ranking of the top fruits with pesticide residues this summer. Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe). https://www.pan-europe.info/blog/ranking-top-fruits-pesticide-residues-summer.
  • Reilly TJ, Smalling KL, Orlando JL, Kuivila KM. 2012. Occurrence of boscalid and other selected fungicides in surface water and groundwater in three targeted use areas in the United States. Chemosphere. 89(3):228–234. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.023.
  • Roberts C. 2020, August 27. Stop eating pesticides: use CR’s exclusive ratings to get the health benefits from fruits and vegetables while minimizing your risk from toxic chemicals. Consumer Reports. https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/stop-eating-pesticides-a1094738355/.
  • Shahbandeh M. 2022. U.S. per capita consumption of fresh vegetables 2021, by type. Tomatoes. New York, NY: Statista.
  • Shaw I, Vannoort R. 2001. 10 - Pesticides. In: Watson DH, editor. Food chemical safety. Sawston, England: Woodhead Publishing; p. 218–237.
  • Toynton K, Luukinen B, Buhl K, Stone D. 2009. Permethrin general fact sheet. National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC), Oregon State University Extension Services.
  • UIUC. 2023. Facts – strawberries & more. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Extension, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of ACES (UIUC).
  • US EPA. 1986. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Fed Regist. 51(185):33992–34003.
  • US EPA. 1989. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) chemical assessment summary (Captan; CASRN 133-06-2). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-National Center for Environmental Assessment.
  • US EPA. 1993. Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments, background document 1A. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 1997, February 7. Pesticide fact sheet. Azoxystrobin. Conditional registration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 1998a, April. R.E.D. facts. Pesticide reregistration. Diphenylamine (EPA-738F-97-010). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 1998b, November. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) (DCPA. EPA-738-R-98-005). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 1999, September. R.E.D. facts. Pesticide reregistration (Captan. EPA-738-F99-015). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 2002, November. Reregistration eligibility decision for endosulfan (EPA 738-R-02-012). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 2003. CompTox chemicals dashboard. Boscalid (188425-85-6. DTXSID6034392). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2005. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment (EPA/630/P-03/001B). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2006a, March. Interim reregistration eligibility decision (IRED) document for formetanate hydrochloride (Case 0091. EPA-738-R-06-015). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 2006b, June. Permethrin facts (Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) fact sheet) (EPA 738-F-06-012). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 2007. Revised N-methyl carbamate cumulative risk assessment. https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/pdf/nmc_revised_cra.pdf.
  • US EPA. 2010a. Memorandum Re: endosulfan: the health effects division’s revised human health risk assessment dated June 30, 2010. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2010b, December 7. Memorandum Re: formetanate hydrochloride: HED human health risk assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2010c, September. Oxamyl registration review summary document: initial docket (Case Number 0253. Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0028). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 2011a. Exposure factors handbook: chapter 8. Washington, D.C.: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency.
  • US EPA. 2011b. Pyrethrin/Pyrethroid cumulative risk assessment. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0746-0003.
  • US EPA. 2015. Memorandum Re: pyrimethanil. Human health risk assessment for proposal uses on greenhouse-grown cucumbers, tomato subgroup 8-10A, lemon subgroup 10-10B, orange subgroup 10-10a, grapfruit subgroup 10-10C, pome fruit group 11-10, stone fruit group 12-12, caneberry subgroup 13-07A, and bushberry subgroup 13-07B dated September 22, 2015. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2016, February 20. Interim reregistration eligibility decision (IRED) fact sheet for formetanate hydrochloride (EPA 738-F-06-01). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
  • US EPA. 2017a, June 22. Memorandum Re: imidacloprid: human health draft risk assessment for registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2017b, June 20. Memorandum Re: oxamyl: draft human health risk assessment in support of registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2017c, June 30. Memorandum Re: permethrin: human health draft risk assessment for registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2018a, December 20. Memorandum Re: azoxystrobin: revised human health draft risk assessment for registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2018b, September 26. Memorandum Re: captan. Human health draft risk assessment in support of registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2018c, August 30. Memorandum Re: diphenylamine – registration review draft human health risk assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2018d, January 18. Memorandum Re: spinosad/spinetoram. Human health risk assessment in support of proposed spinetoram tolerance for residues in/on imported tea. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2018e, August. Update for chapter 9 of the exposure factors handbook – intake of fruits and vegetables (EPA/600/R-18/098F). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development.
  • US EPA. 2019. Memorandum Re: boscalid: human health risk assessment for registration review dated September 25, 2019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2020a, March 24. Memorandum Re: chlorantraniliprole. Scoping document and draft risk assessments for registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2020b. Memorandum Re: fludioxonil. Human health risk assessment for section 3 registration for crop group conversions/expansions for brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B vegetable and brassica, head and stem, group 5–16 and to establish an individual tolerance on kohlrabi dated June 30, 2020. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2020c, March 19. Memorandum Re: formetanate hydrochloride: addendum registration review human health risk assessment to support the preliminary interim decision. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2020d, March 17. Memorandum Re: permethrin: acute and chronic dietary (food and drinking water) exposure and risk assessments for the section 3 registration action (new use on fruit, small, vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13-07F; and tolerance without a U.S. registration in/on tea); and to support registration review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2020e. “Memorandum Re: permethrin: report of the cancer assessment" review committee (fourth evaluation) dated Jan. 13, 2020. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2021. Human health benchmarks for pesticides: updated 2021 technical document. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. 2024. Summary of the food quality protection act. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • US EPA. undated. Chemical details. fludioxonil - 1H-PYRROLE-3-carbonitrile, 4-2(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • USDA. 2015a, September. Agricultural marketing service: the pesticide data program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)-Marketing Service-Science and Technology Programs-Monitoring Programs Division.
  • USDA. 2015b. The pesticide data program. Helping monitor the safety of America’s food supply. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service.
  • USDA. 2019. 2017 Census of agriculture: United States summary and state data, volume 1, geographic area series, part 51, AC-17-A-51. Issued April 2019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)-National Agricultural Statistics Service.
  • USDA. 2021a. U.S. fresh strawberry production expands with newer varieties. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Econmic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2021b, July. What’s behind the USDA organic seal? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service.
  • USDA. 2022a, November 28. Enhancing pepper production in the U.S. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)-National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
  • USDA. 2022b, November 7. Fruit and tree nuts yearbook tables. Table B-11 – cherries, sweet: production, utilization, and season-average grower price, United States, 1980 to date. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022c, November 7. Fruit and tree nuts yearbook tables. Table B-14 – grapes: production, utilization, and season-average grower price, United States, 1980 to date. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022d, November 7. Fruit and tree nuts yearbook tables. Table B-20 – nectarines: production, utilization, and season-average grower price, California, 1980 to date. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022e, November 7. Fruit and tree nuts yearbook tables. Table B-21 – nectarines: production, utilization, and season-average grower price, Washington, 2005 to 2018. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Deptartment of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022f, November 7. Fruit and tree nuts yearbook tables. Table B-24 – peaches: production, utilization, and season-average grower price, United States, 1980 to date. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022g, May. Noncitrus fruits and nuts – 2021 summary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service.
  • USDA. 2022h. Table D-8 – strawberries: acreage, production, season-average grower price, and value, United States, 1980 to date. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022i, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook data tables. Table 19 – U.S. celery, all uses: supply, availability, price and farm weight. #89011. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022j, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook data tables. Table 20 – U.S. collard greens, all uses: supply, availability, price, and farm weight. #89011, 2022. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service,
  • USDA. 2022k, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook data tables. Table 29 – U.S. mustard greens, all uses: supply, availability, price, and farm weight. #89011. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022l, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook data tables. Table 32 – U.S. bell peppers, all uses: supply, availibility, price, and farm weight. #89011. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022m, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook data tables. Table 37 – U.S. fresh spinach: supply, availability, price, and farm weight. #89011. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service,
  • USDA. 2022n, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook data tables. Table 41 – U.S. fresh tomatoes: supply, availability, price and farm weight. #89011., 2022. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Deptartment of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022o, August 26. Vegetables and pulses yearbook tables. Table 27 – U.S. kale, all uses: supply, availibility, price, and farm weight. #89011. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
  • USDA. 2022p, February. Vegetables. 2021 Summary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service.
  • USGS. 2021a. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Azoxystrobin. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021b. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Boscalid. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021c. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Chlorantraniliprole. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021d. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. DCPA. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021e. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Endosulfan. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021f. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Fludioxonil. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021g. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Imidacloprid. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021h. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Oxamyl. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021i. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Pyrimethanil. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • USGS. 2021j. Pesticide national synthesis project. Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use. Pesticide use maps. Spinosyn. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • WHO. 2022, September 15. Pesticide residues in food. Lyon, France: World Health Organization (WHO).
  • Winter CK, Jara EA. 2015. Pesticide food safety standards as companions to tolerances and maximum residue limits. J Integrat Agric. 14(11):2358–2364. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61117-0.
  • Yan HJ, Gaskins VL, Vico I, Luo YG, Jurick WM. 2nd 2014. First report of Penicillium expansum isolates resistant to pyrimethanil from stored apple fruit in Pennsylvania. Plant Dis. 98(7):1004–1004. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-13-1214-PDN.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.