The Role of State Subsidy Policies in Early Education Programs’ Decisions to Accept Subsidies: Evidence from Nationally Representative Data

References

• Acock, A. C., & Long, D. L. (2012). What to do about missing values. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 3. Data analysis and research publication (pp. 27–50). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-002
   Google Scholar
• Adams, G., & Dwyer, K. (2021, April). Child care subsidies and home-based child care providers: Expanding participation. The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, G., & Rohacek, M. (2002). More than a work support? Issues around integrating child development goals into the child care subsidy system. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(4), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00184-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, G., Rohacek, M., & Snyder, K. (2008). Child care voucher programs: provider experiences in five counties. The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Antle, B. F., Frey, A., Barbee, A., Frey, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Cox, M. (2008). Child care subsidy and program quality revisited. Early Education and Development, 19(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802230999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C., & Stuart, E. A. (2015). Moving towards best practice when using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, H. & Clark, M. (2019). Propensity score methods and applications. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071814253
   Google Scholar
• Baldiga, M., Joshi, P., Hardy, E., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2018). Data-for-equity research brief: Child care affordability for working parents. Brandeis University. https://www.nichq.org/sites/default/files/resource-file/ChildCare%20Affordability%20brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bassok, D., Dee, T. S., & Latham, S. (2019). The effects of accountability incentives in early childhood education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 838–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, D., Magouirk, P., & Markowitz, A. J. (2021). Systemwide quality improvement in early childhood education: Evidence from Louisiana. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110116. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211011610
   Google Scholar
• Blau, D. M. (2022). The case for targeted preschool and childcare subsidies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 41(3), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Build Initiative & Child Trends. (2019). A catalog and comparison of quality initiatives [Data system]. http://qualitycompendium.org/
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Care and Development Fund Program. (2016). Rules and regulations, 81 Federal Register 190 (codified at 45 C.F.R., pt. 98).
   Google Scholar
• Child Care Aware of America. (2019). The U.S. and the high price of child care: An examination of a broken system. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/3957809/2019%20Price%20of%20Care%20State%20Sheets/Final-TheUSandtheHighPriceofChildCare-AnExaminationofaBrokenSystem.pdf?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.childcareaware.org%2Four-issues%2Fresearch%2Fthe-us-and-the-high-price-of-child-care-2019%2F
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G., & Rubin, D. B. (1973). Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 35(4), 417–446.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, D. A., Gennetian, L., & Huston, A. C. (2005). Child care assistance policies can affect the use of center-based care for children in low-income families. Applied Developmental Science, 9(2), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0902_4
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. E., Grobe, D., & Weber, R. B. (2010). Rural-urban differences in childcare subsidy use and employment stability. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppp004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. E., Krafft, C., & Forry, N. D. (2016). The role of policy and practice in short spells of child care subsidy participation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw039
   Google Scholar
• De Marco, A., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2015). Child care subsidy use and child care quality in low-wealth, rural communities. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9401-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, K., Minton, S., Kwon, D., & Weisner, K. (2020). Key Cross-State Variations in CCDF Policies as of October 1, 2019: The CCDF Policies Database Book of Tables OPRE Report 2021-07. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://ccdf.urban.org/sites/default/files/state_2019_ccdf_policies_dec_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, K., Minton, S., Kwon, D., & Weisner, K. (2021, February). Key cross-state variations in CCDF policies as of October 1, 2019. The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, K., Tran, V., & Minton, S. (2019). Child care subsidies under the CCDF program: An overview of policy differences across states and territories as of October 1, 2018 (OPRE Report 2019-116). Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Giapponi Schneider, K., Erickson Warfield, M., Joshi, P., Ha, Y., & Hodgkin, D. (2017). Insights into the black box of child care supply: Predictors of provider participation in the Massachusetts child care subsidy system. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, C. J., Whitaker, A. A., & Cannon, J. S. (2022). Do early care and education programs improve when enrolled in quality rating and improvement systems? Longitudinal evidence from one system. Early Education and Development, 34(5), 1236–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2012). Missing data: Analysis and design. Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8(3), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, E., Isaacs, J. B., Derrick-Mills, T., Michie, M., & Stevens, K. (2018). Are higher subsidy payment rates and provider-friendly payment policies associated with child care quality? The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Y., Joshi, P., Giapponi Schneider, K., & Hardy, E. (2020). Can administrative changes improve child-care stability? Social Service Review, 94(2), 285–338. https://doi.org/10.1086/70944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle, T., Banghart, P., Zaslow, M., Cook, M., Kane, M., Bartlett, J. D., Llyod, C. M., Cox, A., Lloyd, C. M., & Redd, Z. (2019). Implementation lessons from six early head start- Child care partnerships. Early Education & Development, 30(8), 990–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1656320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2008). Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 171(2), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. M., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Keeping kids in care: Reducing administrative burden in state Child Care Development Fund policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab020
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. D., Ryan, R. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2012). Child-care subsidies: Do they impact the quality of care children experience? Child Development, 83(4), 1444–1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.1780.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S. (2021). A mixed-methods study of Maryland’s monetary incentives to improve the quality of child care centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, W. (2016). Practical propensity score methods using R. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802854
   Google Scholar
• Madill, R., Lin, V.-K., Friese, S., & Paschall, K. (2018). Access to early care and education for disadvantaged families: Do levels of access reflect states’ child care subsidy policies? Child Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson, K. A., & Waldfogel, J. (2016). Trends in income-related gaps in enrollment in early childhood education: 1968 to 2013. AERA Open, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416648933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, H., & Schumacher, R. (2008). Ensuring quality care for low-income babies: Contracting directly with providers to expand and improve infant and toddler care. Center for Law and Social Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, C., Lundquist, E., & Castells, N. (2010). The effects of child care subsidies for moderate-income families in Cook County, Illinois (OPRE 2011-3). Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Minton, S., Durham, C., Huber, E., & Giannarelli, L. (2012). The CCDF policies database book of tables: Key cross-state variations in CCDF policies as of October 1, 2011 (OPRE Report 2012-51). Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. (2013). National Survey of Early Care and Education: Summary Data Collection and Sampling Methodology OPRE Report #2013-46. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/nsece_summarymethodology_toopre_102913.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NSECE Project Team. (2012). National Survey of Early Care and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Planning, Research, & Evaluation. (2008). Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) policies database, 2008-2019. Administration for children and families. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/research/project/child-care-and-development-fund-ccdf-policies-database-2008-1013
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2019). States’ payment rates under the Child Care and Development Fund. https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-15-00170.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pishgar, F., Greifer, N., Leyrat, C., & Stuart, E. (2021). MatchThem: Matching and weighting after multiple imputation. The R Journal. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2021/RJ-2021-073/
   Google Scholar
• Rohacek, M. (2012). A Summary of Research on How CCDF Policies Affect Providers. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/summary-research-how-ccdf-policies-affect-providers
   Google Scholar
• Rohacek, M., & Adams, G. (2017). Providers in the child care subsidy system: Insights into factors shaping participation, well-being, and quality. Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, K. E., Stuart, E. A., Glass, T. A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2014). Neighborhood disadvantage in context: The influence of urbanicity on the association between neighborhood disadvantage and adolescent emotional disorders. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 49(3), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0725-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, H., Coffey, A., Henly, J., Bromer, J., Spalding, A., Thomas, W., Greenberg, E., & Derrick-Mills, T. (2018). Learning from child care providers across settings: A critical step to improving the quality and stability of subsidized care. Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, K. (2019). Early progress: State child care assistance policies 2019. National Women’s Law Center.
   Google Scholar
• Slicker, G. (2022). Examining Provider Participation in the Child Care Subsidy System: A Mixed Methods Study. https://www.proquest.com/openview/2feaf2ff3ce71a19996dbed7ec28f4f2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
   Google Scholar
• Slicker, G., & Hustedt, J. T. (2022). Predicting participation in the child care subsidy system from provider features, community characteristics, and use of funding streams. Children & Youth Services Review, 136, 106392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slicker, G., Hustedt, J. T., & Stoffers, M. (2023). Participation of early care and education centers in the child care subsidy system: A statewide mixed methods investigation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoemmes, F. J., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A Systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(1), 90–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.540475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care. (2021). FY 2019 Child Care and Development Fund data tables (preliminary). https://www.acf.hhs.gov/occ/data/fy-2019-ccdf-data-tables-preliminary
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). Access to subsidies and strategies to manage demand vary across states. https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/681652.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. B., Grobe, D., & Davis, E. E. (2014). Does policy matter? The effect of increasing child care subsidy policy generosity on program outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Cham, H., Thoemmes, F., Renneberg, B., Schulze, J., & Weiler, M. (2014). Propensity scores as a basis for equating groups: Basic principles and application in clinical treatment outcome research. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 82(5), 906–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanoni, W., & Johnson, A. D. (2019). Child care subsidy use and children’s outcomes in middle school. AERA Open, 5(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419884540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar